RIM's secret plan to get BlackBerry out of the smartphone jam

Jack Gold is the founder and principal analyst at IT analyst firm J.Gold Associates.

RIM has been feeling the heat in the smartphone business, along with everyone else who is not iPhone or Android powered. Indeed, Android has even been pressuring Apple’s success in the marketplace with new and attractive smartphones from HTC, Motorola, Samsung and others. And BlackBerry has fallen behind in compelling features and functions, and particularly its user experience.

So does that mean BlackBerry will follow the same path as Windows Mobile and Symbian, becoming a has-been in the market as many have predicted? Maybe not.

RIM has been taking major steps to upgrade and revamp the BlackBerry platform and is in the midst of a major transformation from which I expect a new and competitive OS, compelling devices and enhanced user experience to emerge. The first phase of this transformation will arrive with the imminent release of the BlackBerry OS 6 and complementary devices, with a second phase coming in about 12-18 months. While RIM has not been as vocal or marketing-driven as its competitors, it has been working behind the scenes to acquire new technologies and to strengthen technologies it already owns. Recent acquisitions have been low profile, but taken together they forge a view of where RIM’s technology is headed. For instance, some of RIM’s keys acquisitions over the past couple of years include:

•  Torch Mobile – this is probably the preeminent acquisition RIM has made for its BlackBerry platform improvement program, and the one with the most immediately visible payback. Torch gives RIM a Webkit-based rendering engine. When integrated into a new BlackBerry browser, it will significantly increase performance compared to BlackBerry’s not very well regarded current browser. It’s a key component of the new user experience as well. But perhaps more importantly, it gives BlackBerry an industry standard HTML5 capability and will enable Flash and potentially Silverlight support. The challenge for RIM is to make the WebKit rendering engine secure enough to not undo BlackBerry’s compelling security advantage.

•  Viigo – gives RIM new programming tools and a platform to deploy real-time content. Viigo is a consolidator and syndicator of web based information and real-time content delivery and can be configured to access and push data from enterprise systems (e.g., data sheets, sales updates, service bulletins). Viigo could give BlackBerry App World a boost by syndicating new apps, and it could potentially enable a music or video service.

•  Alt-N Technologies –  provides RIM with an easy to deploy and manage email server targeted at companies that don’t need all the robust features (and costs) of an Exchange implementation. I expect Alt-N to be bundled with BES Express for a complete stand-alone mobile email solution which would appeal to many SMB customers and provide enterprises with an alternative to the Exchange/ActiveSync environment.

•  Dash Navigation Inc –  provides technology that can be directly applied to the BlackBerry Maps app to enable full navigation and further extend its capabilities in Location Based Services (LBS), competing with Google Maps and Nokia’s Navteq LBS solutions.

•  QNX – provides RIM with a substantial portfolio of Real Time Operating System (RTOS) experience and Intellectual Property (IP), including important voice and audio/acoustics algorithms, Flash tool kits, and Intel Atom expertise. This allows RIM to fundamentally re-architect the BlackBerry OS from the ground up. Its deep custom design expertise and a close alliance with auto makers and embedded machine vendors gives RIM an expansive opportunity to address new markets, including a path to a “BerryPad”.

While the company’s recent acquisitions provide it with key technologies, RIM still has a daunting challenge to meet Android and iPhone head-on. Further, it can not afford any major missteps or long delays in getting to market. To meet the challenge, I believe RIM will need to quickly add competitive capabilities to its ecosystem in the following areas.

A Monetization Engine — (like Apple iAd or Google AdMob). RIM is part way there with Viigo.

Gaming – BlackBerry needs to be a more appealing gaming platform. WebKit and HTML5 provides BlackBerry with a streaming/online gaming capability it currently doesn’t have.

Social Networking – BlackBerry Messenger is gaining traction as a secure and reliable private messaging service, particularly in developing countries. RIM could leverage this capability to increase the social networking functions already enabled on its devices with clients for Facebook, Twitter, etc.

E-Wallet — Eventually RIM will need a “money exchange”, e-wallet or billing solution (like Nokia’s Ovi Payments), especially as it expands into the developing world. It would be better for RIM to partner rather than acquire this.

Enterprise Apps – I expect continued partnership announcements for the enterprise space from IBM, SAP, Salesforce.com, etc. RIM will not abandon this core constituency anytime soon, nor should it.

Mobile Management – It is apparent that few companies will standardize on a single smartphone platform in the future. RIM should explore extending at least partial BES capability to non-BlackBerry devices.

I believe RIM faces a number of challenges in transitioning its platform into a more “modernized” ecosystem. While it is already a major player in the consumer space, with more units now sold to consumers and pro-sumers than enterprises, it has not kept up with many of its major competitors. RIM must address a number of challenges. First, what its brand means going forward. While it built its reputation on messaging, it must now become associated with much more functionality and be seen as the leader in innovating the new user experiences in modern mobility. RIM must decide to move further up the value chain with additional products and capabilities. It has started on this path with its MVS but needs to do more. Further, as we move to more caps on data plans, network efficiency becomes important. Like MPG ratings for cars, RIM which is known for its network utilization efficiency, should pursue a comparison of typical user actions like email, opening a web page, etc. with other platforms. This has major implications on end-user total cost of ownership if BlackBerry can show an advantage. Finally, with its new acquisitions, RIM now has the ability to expand beyond smartphones and into tablets and other Internet-capable devices.

Its clear that RIM is transforming the BlackBerry. What’s not yet clear is if customers, both enterprises (its traditional constituency) and consumers will embrace it. We should know in the next 12-18 months.  But I believe that the steps RIM has taken will dramatically improve its market position against Android, iPhone, HP’s WebOS, etc. Paraphrasing Mark Twain, I believe the demise of BlackBerry has been highly exaggerated.

This post is an edited excerpt from J.Gold Associates’ research report, “BlackBerry’s Jam and RIM’s Transformation”. Jack Gold is the founder and principal analyst at J.Gold Associates, based in Northborough, Mass. He covers the many aspects of business and consumer computing and emerging technologies.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

  • PeterA650

    Integrating disparate companies to revamp an outdated product is a losing strategy IMO.

  • Crowd_Sorcerer

    The WebKit browser is becoming a mobile industry standard. In fact, a WebKit browser is now considered an essential feature for any mobile platform.Apart from HTML-5 ability, by lessening the differences between browsers, it helps bring us a bit closer to the goal of a common application platform for web apps. Not perfect, as there are some differences between WebKit browsers, but definitely much closer.BlackBerry's move towards WebKit follows the same approach by almost every mobile platform. iPhone, Android and WebOS are all running WebKit as their main browser. Even Samsung's bada recently introduced a new WebKit browser.The sole vendor to reject WebKit is Microsoft, which may have resulted from CEO Steve Ballmer's distaste for open-source software. Microsoft's rejection of WebKit is to its own peril. Lack of a native development environment in Windows Phone 7 has stopped other browser vendors from developing for that platform. Mobile IE is all you get.It leaves Microsoft in a lonely place. It leaves Microsoft with a significantly slower browser (WP7 uses a slightly modified version of the now ancient IE7). It slows down the development process of Windows Phone 7, as Microsoft's rejection of open-source means that it must develop the whole browser on its own.

  • http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/vendor/1111 Eric at Ebscer

    Social Networking: BlackBerry's current offerings plus BBM and the soon to be released BBID puts them in pretty good position there.Ad Service: RIM actually announced that they were going to roll out an ad service before google or apple went and bought theirs. Was supposed to be out about a month ago and doesn't look to be ready soon, but they are working on it.QNX: By far the most interesting. A lot of different ways that tech could go.

  • jonlim

    RIM has to stop trying to be a “me too” smartphone developer as they seem to be doing with their Storm and BB6. They should build around social networking and BBM, while strengthening their enterprise solutions.Why? Aside from many many many business people (and businesses!) still insisting on using Blackberries for the strength of their enterprise offerings, there are a plethora of teens who have or want to have Blackberries. What do these teens and other young adults use it for? BBMing with their friends and using Facebook and Twitter.In my opinion, even thinking about touch screens or gaming might be a bit of a stretch for RIM. They should stick to what they know and build their new customer bases.

  • http://twitter.com/IDRSec I.D. Rank Security

    There's always room for three market leaders. History has shown this time and again. RIM has been one of these, but their recent market cap losses are telling a tale.Here's what critical for RIM to remain one of the three market leaders in second phase 12-18 months you mention above:1. The difficulties in creating applications in the current OS's must be flattened with the release of OS 6.0. With this new OS release, the growth of applications need not match iPhone or Android, but it mst get above 10,000 3rd party apps.2. Will 6.0 (QNX) only work on the new 9800 series? If so, what is the plan to address OS deficiencies in the 5.0 line for Bold and Tour models? What of the complicated development environment? 3rd party vendors may have to choose which platforms to develop for. If this is the case, will it be BlackBerry, Android or RIM?3. Will all applications execute equally well on CDMA devices as on GSM devices? Or, will vendors be required to have different application version for the two device types?4. Will the new devices and OS retain the NIST FIPS 140-2 accreditation?5. In a similar approach as executed by Apple and Google, will RIM release the new development environments for 6.0 5 months ahead of the release of 6.0?Without addressing the development environments for 3rd parties, RIM products in the second 12-18 months identified in your article will have market share issues.

blog comments powered by Disqus