Foursquare's record check-ins aren't because of Facebook

Facebook’s latest feature, Places, mimics the core function of another hot startup, Foursquare: announcing to your friends where you are. The long-expected competition stirred a lot of buzz in Facebook’s Silicon Valley turf and Foursquare’s home base, media-soaked Manhattan.

So when Foursquare founder and CEO Dennis Crowley disclosed that his service had a record number of signups on Thursday, a lot of people rushed to declare Facebook the cause.

After all, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made a lot of people aware of the idea of checking in to a real-world location online, but then his team took its time rolling it out. In the meantime, a lot of people would have decided to check out the most popular location service to date — which is Foursquare, with roughly 3 million users — right?

My gut instinct says that’s wrong. It’s the classic kind of logical fallacy our professors warned us about in college: post hoc ergo propter hoc, declaring that because one thing happened after another, the earlier event caused the later one.

It’s also a classic sign of inside-the-tech-bubble groupthink: Everything in the world happens because one geek speaks!

First of all, Foursquare’s growing fast, in a network-effects business, where every new user both makes the service more attractive to their friends and helps encourage them to sign up. Wouldn’t it stand to reason that most days would have a record number of signups? This week just happens to be a strategic time to make an observation that Crowley probably could have made on many, many days since Foursquare’s launch in March 2009.

Also, Foursquare’s been doing a lot to promote itself in the real world, from offering stickers to businesses that encourage users to check in, to partnering with popular media properties like the Expendables and Dora the Explorer. Oh, and don’t forget the 25 percent discount Gap offered users checking into a store on Foursquare. Foursquare and Gap didn’t respond to inquiries about the success of that promotion, but people are still tweeting about it — a good indicator of its viral buzz.

In short, Foursquare’s doing everything a scrappy startup should do to make itself heard in the real world. Facebook, in the meantime, launched Places to a super-insidery crowd — even shuttling reporters in a Wi-Fi-equipped bus from San Francisco’s tech-soaked SoMa neighborhood to its Palo Alto headquarters, where reporters listened to Zuckerberg speak and then hung out with Facebook engineers.

Crowley is smart to take a wait-and-see attitude on Facebook Places. Sure, the competition is worth checking out. In the meantime, his users just keep checking in.

[Image credit: Saxon]

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags: , , ,

Photo of Owen Thomas

About the Author,

Owen Thomas is the executive editor of VentureBeat. His career has ranged from Suck.com to the Red Herring, from Time to Valleywag, but he's consistently been interested in the transformative effects of innovation on business and culture. Also, he loves you but has an odd way of showing it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dneuman David Neuman

    I have to disagree with your post. I know plenty of people who joined FourSquare that day because of Facebook Places. There's no question that FourSquare is growing rapidly and that they'll continue to break records in terms of daily sign ups, but the reasoning behind Thursday's surge is because of Facebook.This is what I witnessed a LOT on Facebook.Person 1 (status update): This new Facebook Places feature is really cool.Person 2 (comment): Agreed. You'll probably like FourSquare if you like Facebook Places. Person 1 (comment): Wow that's awesome!Usually more in-depth than the example, but FourSquare's current draw is becoming the mayor and the incentives that go along with it. When people discover that they can do what they're doing on Facebook Places, but only better and get rewarded for it, it causes the shift to the other medium.

  • http://sheynkman.tumblr.com Kirill Sheynkman

    The issue is that in the dialog example (which may very well be true) is that there are a lot of “Person 1″ who are not connected to a “Person 2″ who uses Foursquare. And the personal value of any social network is proportional to how many people in your social graph are co-users.

  • MrGutts

    If he thinks FourSquare is growing so much, why hasn't the application grown any in the past 6 months? The application is abysmal with location and GPS detection and the app tends to crash a ton.

blog comments powered by Disqus