How Apple could become the world's biggest tech company (reader poll)

MobileBeat 2013
July 9-10, 2013
San Francisco, CA
Tickets On Sale Now

Not many companies get a second chance. In that respect, Apple has led a charmed life. The company led the first boom in personal computers but fell behind the PC juggernaut as Microsoft, the PC clone makers, and a broad array of PC industry supporters soared past Apple, leaving it with about 2 percent of the personal computer market.

Steve Jobs was booted from the company and he came back. He shut down Apple’s clone-licensing program and shifted into the mobile device market with the iPod. That device disrupted the music player market and ushered in the era of cheap content with 99 cent songs. The iPhone extended that disruption into the smartphone market. With apps leading the charge, Apple has grabbed a huge share of the smartphone market.

If Apple hangs onto this market share, it could become the world’s biggest tech company. As Eric Schmidt, chief executive of Google, recently said, computing is now shifting to the phone. We will become a mobile first society as desktop computers and laptops are marginalized by emergence of powerful super phones. Apple has already surpassed the market capitalization of Microsoft in May and in September quarter it passed up Microsoft’s revenues for the first time in 15 years.

On a worldwide basis, Apple has just 4.1 percent of the mobile phone market, up from 2.5 percent a year ago, according to market researcher IDC. Nokia still ships about eight times more phones than Apple does.

But in smartphones, the story is different. Apple has managed to pass up Research in Motion, the maker of the BlackBerry, in terms of smartphones sold per quarter. If Apple hangs on to a larger market share of smartphones — which are poised to become the world’s biggest tech product — then it could become the giant of technology.

Android has emerged to challenge Apple. Through broad and open licensing, Google hopes to overtake Apple and marginalize it the same way that happened in PCs.

Jobs is in a mad scramble to make sure that doesn’t happen, launching its phones in new territories as fast as it can. In that respect, getting off the ground in China, where Android had a lead, was very important to Apple. The company is opening Apple stores everywhere in hopes of marketing its brand as a lifestyle experience. It is using its profits and considerable cash to advertise around the world.

Apple has already proven that it can go vertical — or make more of layers of its products than others do — and succeed. It makes its own operating systems, its own hardware, its own microprocessor chips, and sells devices in its own stores. That allows it to capture more margin and take back revenues that were once considered lost to partners such as Intel or Best Buy.

At the same time, Apple leverages the work of companies such as microprocessor architecture licensor ARM, contract chip manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and hardware assembler Foxconn. Those partners help give Apple the manufacturing and design scale it needs. Apple might even try to cut carriers out of the equation with a move to SIM cards in Europe.

Google hopes to isolate Apple with the openness argument. But the way to beat Apple is to match it on the experience and design of outstanding products and then to bring down the price through high-volume efficiencies. That’s how the tablet makers, phone makers, and PC makers hope to take away Apple’s momentum. At some point, Apple will have to decide whether it wants to become more open and to play in the lowest cost markets.

If it makes the right moves, it could stay ahead of Microsoft and Google and catch up with the likes of IBM and Hewlett-Packard. HP is far behind in smartphones, but it generated $30.7 billion in its most recent quarter ended July 31. Apple posted revenue of $20.3 billion in the quarter ended Sept. 30, while Microsoft reported revenue of $16 billion and IBM reported revenue of $24.3 billion. Apple isn’t all that far away from being on top.

To get to the top and stay there, Apple will have to figure out some tough competitive problems. It will have to try to beat Nokia in the rest of the world in low-cost cell phones. It will likely have to figure out how to challenge HP and IBM in enterprise markets. It has only begun to crack those markets with its mobile devices. But it probably will also need a stronger resurgence of the Mac as a platform in order to make headway. It also needs Apple TV to succeed in a big way and use that success to lever its way into the video game console business (where Apple’s 99 cent apps could again prove disruptive).

Perhaps these challenges are too big and it’s just a fantasy. But to even consider this possibility — that Apple could become the biggest tech company — is a victory in itself. Just a few years ago, it would have seemed ridiculous. Only Apple’s own potential missteps and a broad alliance of enemies can stop Apple.

What’s your own opinion? Please leave a comment and vote in our poll below.

Will Apple become the world’s biggest technology company?Market Research

Topics:

, ,
  • http://twitter.com/SinishaS Sinisa Slavkovski

    Why do you think Apple wants to be on top at every possible price? Do you really think they will be selling cheap mobiles?Apple is the most profitable of all mentioned, so why should they bother?

  • Maestro Windows

    Apple is capitalist, will die if not is more open and cheap

  • gorash

    I really doubt that Apple could dominate the market for long… Their products are too restrictive for too many people's taste.

    Companies like Apple and Nintendo have figured a way to make tons of money by cleverly marketing their products to casual and ordinary people. And it has worked – for a while. But other companies won't be staying quiet for long.

  • steffenjobbs

    I pray that Apple stays away from the low end smartphone business. If Apple has to give up market share then so be it. Let Nokia and Android smartphones dominate the cheapster markets. Just as Apple wanted nothing to do with netbooks, Apple should stay away from $50 smartphones. Apple needs to continue pursuing the high-end mobile device market where smart consumers are discerning enough to know quality and appreciate good customer service. There will be plenty of bottom feeder smartphone vendors trying to grab the leftover dregs. Let Apple keep the high-end brand loyalty.I want to see Apple rise to be the wealthiest tech company and maybe even the wealthiest company on the planet if even just for a short while. Maybe that will shut up the naysayers for doubting Apple's knowledge of the consumer market. Next stop, Apple $350.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/IWQ7HIPZ4UJ5YWJB7JSYZ7QXKM watchdog

    Apple can reach $35B revenue in CY4Q11 by having iPhone grow to 26m units/qtr, iPad grow to 15m units/qtr, no growth in Macs, contraction in iPods, and little growth in everything else. The iPhone and iPad projections are easily within the range of possibility, as analysts are projecting 80m iPhone sales and 45m iPad sales in CY2011. Imagine if Mac sales grew and AppleTV sales grew. The question is how fast will HP grow?

  • BenHill123

    so by biggest you mean revenues and profits. That is a wrong measure, biggest should mean how many users you serve, how many users spend a lot of time using your service and how many users depend on your product. I would say microsoft and google are much bigger than apple. Microsoft and Google services and product reach more than a billion humans on the planet and facebook is fast catching up with microsoft and google with around 550 million users. Apple products are used by 250 million max.

  • 2coasts

    You missed the point completely with Apple. Apple is enjoying it's current success without chasing market share or competing with low end products. I doesn't need to and it never will. It does enjoy high market with several of its products because they are superior to what competitors offer (many at cheaper price points). Apple is not motivated by or wanting to be like IBM or HP. If anything HP would like to be more like Apple. It would love to have Apple's electronic ecosystem. Also if given a choice of having the most revenue or being the most profitable. To me, being the most profitable wins. Apple has always pursued profit over total revenue. Even so it is on the path to achieving both – being the most profitable and achieving the highest revenue – without selling to the low-end. That is and will be rare accomplishment.

  • http://venturebeat.com deantak

    At last, we've got a nice discussion going. I like these different points of view. I think that Apple could actually do pretty well in the low-end of the market, just as HP's large size allows it to do well in the low-end printer market even though it makes great high-end printers. Apple has many volume efficiencies already thanks to TSMC, Apple Stores, and Foxconn, as I pointed out. It could probably operate profitably in the low end. You already see how it has attacked the low end of laptops with the iPad.

  • http://twitter.com/panostsapanidis Panos Tsapanidis

    “It will have to try to beat Nokia in the rest of the world in low-cost cell phones.”Sorry but you obviously don't know Apple…

  • lrd555

    According to Steve Jobs, dumb phones are slowly but surely being replaced with smart phones.In short, eventually, maybe 5 years down the road, every phone will be like an iPhone.Therefore, Apple's long term strategy might be and probably is to offset revenues from hardware sales by app sales, ads, movie rentals, music downloads, books, etc., from iTunes. Not just from the iPhone but from various devices including iMacs, iPODs, iBooks & AppleTV.According to Steve Jobs, it will become a zero sum game down the road, like 5 years from now, and the best way to ensure Apple's ability to be the last company standing is to build a huge ecosystem that devices will continually feed Apple income 24/7.I think AirPlay could serve a central role in this strategy and could catapult the somewhat dormant AppleTV to the top of Apple growth plan.Thus the huge server farm in NC.

  • Crowd_Sorcerer

    iPhone and Android now have an insurmountable lead.Apart from economies of scale for components, there are also economies of scale for apps. Software vendors can release cheap apps on iPhone and Android, because they will sell in volume.Any new mobile platform will be in trouble, because it won't be able to sell large volumes of apps, and software vendors will have to charge more to remain viable.We ended up with 2 main players on the personal computer: Microsoft and Apple. The same will happen with smartphones, because one player will absolutely dominate, but there will always be some who don't want to use the dominant player (just as the Mac was used by those who didn't want to use Microsoft's products). The other players never gain traction, and fall away.

  • http://x.co/Jeb4 > TOO DANGEROUS space tourism!

    no, Apple can't become the world’s biggest tech company, because, great part of its products and services already are (or are close to be) under threat (or soon to be killed) by Android, GoogleOS, GoogleMusic, GoogleTV, lots of low cost iPad clones, etc.

  • http://twitter.com/PXLated PXLated

    Revenues/profits are the only thing that counts – free users make no difference. Free users will bankrupt ya.

  • http://twitter.com/PXLated PXLated

    Hallucinogens certainly are fun aren't they :-)

  • BenHill123

    revenues/profits matters to shareholders/investors, not for end-users ;) end-users care about what the service is providing to you. And so facebook, microsoft and google are much bigger than Apple ever will be, since more end-users use the services/products provided by microsoft, facebook and google. It is just the business model. I would say microsoft is still much bigger than Apple. There are so many mega corporations dependent on microsoft like Intel, Dell, HP. Google is slowly transitioning into that model. There are more ways to run a business than selling an integrated device you know and google, facebook and microsoft are still plenty profitable

  • http://www.bigjobsboard.com Steve Jobs

    I doubt Apple can dominate the market or even be with the likes of Microsoft and Google. They are in business for profit and not for market domination. Just look at how expensive their products are and you will know their true intent. They will fail at China with all those cheap products abound.

  • http://twitter.com/maxwelli Ian Maxwell

    apple's job is to deliver value to its shareholders. so market share shouldn't be a consideration unless market share affects that.also they aren't big enough to tackle all the segments the author noted in the vertical approach they currently adopt. being so vertical means they can only realistically tackle one or two markets at a time, no matter how big they are.I can't help feeling that Apple is defying gravity with its old-world vertical model. They impress the hello out of me, but I can't help feeling that all it would take is one or two slip-ups, and they will slide out backwards pretty quickly. their products aren't very sticky and don't have a lot of residual income..

  • http://twitter.com/davebartell davebartell

    The antenna problem with iPhone 4th gen was a slip up and, finally, handled okay.Residual income – iTunes?

  • http://twitter.com/davebartell davebartell

    What exactly are the metrics for world's biggest tech company? (gross revenue, mkt share, # of customers?) Why does it matter? (egos?) Also, HP, IBM and Msft have very large services organizations. Apple has no pursuit of the business/enterprise marketplace. Apple's old line, “Computing for the rest of us”, fits very well into the cloud computing world.

  • http://twitter.com/maxwelli Ian Maxwell

    antenna was a smallish issue. the problem they have is that one problem affects their one product in one niche. unlike most companies that have 20 products in one niche. It means apple are far more exposed to issues.agree itunes has income, but when people swap their devices for non-apple devices (in the yearly renewal cycle) you will see the likes of google and others promoting alternative content services. I wonder how sticky itunes really is? my guess is that people's habits will follow their mobile device, not their tethered devices…

blog comments powered by Disqus