Will charging infrastructure be the electric car's speed bump?

This year — and next — will be a busy one for arrival of electric cars. The Ford Focus Electric and Coda’s sedan are slated for launch by 2011. The Nissan Leaf is slowly making its way to buyers in the U.S. and Europe, the Wheego Whip and LiFe are on sale in New York, and the partially electric Chevrolet Volt is on dealer lots now.

Yet Tesla Motors, the one company that’s been ahead of the pack in actually selling electric vehicles, saw its stock price  drop 16 percent today.

The Silicon Valley-based maker of the all-electric sports car Roadster saw its stock drop today in part due to today’s expiry of the 180-day lockup period that kept insiders from selling their shares. But it also fell 8 percent Thursday after being downgraded to a “sell” by analyst Carter Driscoll of Capstone Investments. One of the reasons for his new rating was the lack of publicly available charging infrastructure, which he predicts will push green car buyers more towards hybrids and plug-in hybrids.

It’s not an issue unique to Tesla, Driscoll told me.

“While the infrastructure is clearly growing daily and there’s a lot of state support … it’s going to be a number of years before the infrastructure is widely developed and widely recognized by the buying public to alleviate some of the range issue concerns,” Driscoll said.

Lack of charging infrastructure has also been reportedly cited as the reason for Nissan Leaf delays in markets in Maryland and Washington, D.C., according to All Cars Electric.

But Paul Scott, cofounder of advocacy group Plug In America (and an electric car owner himself), argues it’s not an issue because most people will do the majority of their charging at home.

“We could get by with zero public infrastructure and the cars would be fine. Millions of Americans would be totally fine charging at home,” Scott said. “Any public infrastructure is just icing on the cake. It’s nice but not necessary.”

Scott also pointed out that the plug for the Tesla Roadster doesn’t jibe with the current charging standard J1772, which was developed after the Roadster came out — so public chargers can’t currently service the Roadster. Scott expects Tesla’s 2012 Model S  sedan to be chargeable with the new standard.

The Department of Energy’s director of Vehicle Technologies Program Pat Davis also argued that home charging will suffice on the DOE’s blog last week:

“Today, there are very few public charging stations out there, as of the middle of December in 2010. And that’s really okay because at this point most people are going to be charging their vehicles locally, typically at home.”

Even though charging infrastructure companies like Ecotality and Coulomb are rolling out lots of chargers fueled in part by government funds, the projects are still underway. Ecotality is rolling out 15,000 chargers in 16 cities, a project that is slated to finish in summer 2011. Coulomb plans to allocate and install 5,000 chargers nationwide by October 2011.

NRG Energy CEO David Crane told me last month that the company discovered Tokyo only needed 60 charging stations to be declared fully wired — and expects that the sprawling city of Houston, where NRG is launching charging infrastructure with monthly rates, would need anywhere from 50 to 150 chargers.

Having launched earlier, hybrids do have a better toehold on the green car market than electric cars and will likely continue to do so. Cars like the Toyota Prius have been around longer and eliminate consumer fears of running out of battery, also known as “range anxiety.” According to a J.D. Power & Associates report, 5.2 million hybrid or electric cars will be sold in 2020 (or 7.3 percent of the overall car market), and the vast majority — 3.9 million — will be hybrid electric vehicles, with 1.7 million of those forecast to be in the U.S. And of the 1.3 million battery electric vehicles sold in 2020, the U.S. would account for only 100,000 of those.

Ford is expecting most of their green car sales to come from plug-in hybrids and hybrids — which made sense to me after I test-drove a Ford Focus Electric and was warned on a blistering hot Texas summer day that running the air conditioner would deplete the battery faster.

There are other factors that can keep buyers from going for an all-electric car, of course. They’re pricier than many gas-powered vehicles, and it’s still not clear how long batteries last and whether people are willing to change their driving habits for it. Though analyst Driscoll sees charging infrastructure expanding in future years, he sees the current dearth of charging stations as a deterrent to electric car sales right now.

“It is  one aspect of the auto purchase decision that is an hindrance to the adoption of EVs (electric vehicles),” Driscoll said.

Scott of Plug In America disagrees.

“There are tens of millions of people for whom it’s not an issue at all. (Electric) carmakers will not run out of customers for years to come,” Scott said.

[Image via Flickr/milos milosevic]

  • http://twitter.com/zattinho Matthew Zatto

    How lame is Twitter's BackType? Seriously? Someone at VB needs to do something about this rubbish. The infrastructure issue means nothing until the cost of the technology comes down. Period. Look at the glowing testimonials of electric car owners — once the car is commercially viable (see Model S) it is going to take off. As someone who worked at Tesla and drived them often, has a relative that owns one and still have contact to a few of the owners that I had built relationships with… range isn't an issue with 220+ miles per charge. It's the ultimate commuter car, you get to ride in the fast lane and actually get to utilize the most raw torque your ass has ever felt… then plug it in when you get back to your garage. My relative drives 40 miles a day, and enjoys every kW. Think about it, 90% of the time you use your primary (and I say Primary because most families have more than one car) vehicle to get to work and around town; NOT make a 400 miler to SoCal. And in 5 years, Tesla will be able to push 500mi on a single charge. Regarding the stock's drop. Investors want to lock into profits, mighty juicy profits at its current $25 price. Everyone knows that TSLA is one of the most shorted stocks at the moment but with volatile oil on the rise and a revisited focus on renewables and tougher emissions regulation, the realization that Tesla has the secret sauce when it comes to the all-electric powertrain. Toyota knows what that sauce tastes like and they can't wait to bring the Rav4-EV to market.

  • IrisKuo

    Hi Matthew, not sure what problem you're referring to in regards to BackType — can you provide more detail? My guess is that EV buyers right now are the early adopters; so the charging & cost are less of an issue — the real test will come when cost comes down and infrastructure is built out. Right now the average car buyer is leery of EVs due to real or perceived technology risk.

  • Haggie

    Unless someone is willing to pick up the tab to wire my building's 30+ garage spaces and tie them all into each unit's meter, an electric car is not an option. I would think this is a substantial obstacle for market penetration in major cities.

  • http://twitter.com/cthorm Casey Thormahlen

    It's not just about the charging infrastructure! At least in the US, the current power grid is no where near ready for mass adoption of electric vehicles. Even assuming there would be no interruptions in electricity supply, prices will rise significantly. The supply of fossil fuels is much more elastic than for electricity, unless capacity is already in place. Say the US buys something like 10 Million Nissan Leafs, and drives each ~50 miles per day (~32kwh per 100 miles); that would be an additional 62,050 gigawatt-hours of electricity demand per year, or about 1.6% of total US electricity in 2015 according to the Energy Information Agency. The EIA expects the US to expand capacity at about 1% per year through 2015, and nearly half of that power is coming from coal.

  • http://twitter.com/djcjevents DJCJ Events

    And the problem with coal is that it increases green house emissions and also past peak so you are running out of it…Now if America followed the Chinese and invested heavily in non weapons grade Thorium fueled reactors (China has three coming online this year btw) that would solve the energy issues that you are facing. but that commitment should have been made 10 – 15 years ago. Given the time it will take to get the amount of reactors online and associated infrastructure up and running that are needed to replace fossil fuels which currently account for approximately 60% of your energy consumption and the diminishing supply of petrol as a fuel source for transportation you are looking at a very serious issue in regards to meeting your current energy needs let alone the needs of 5 – 10 years from now given the exponential growth of population and hence energy consumption.Just imagine what would have happened if you hadn't wasted all that fuel, time, manpower and money invading Iraq and Afghanistan for the past 10 years.America would have actually been in a position to switch over to electricity right about now. This would have provided massive employment opportunities for the past 10 years, completely upgraded your energy infrastructure, cut down on fossil fuel consumption from the military and associated green house emissions and allowed y'all to stay ahead of the game.Instead you find yourself in the current quagmire of rapidly diminishing fuel resources, massive debt, rampant hyper inflation and to cap it all off being hated by the rest of the world for your aggression and ignorance.

  • IrisKuo

    @Haggie — Agreed. I think urban charging solutions are tough and have yet to come. Right now the market for EVs seems to be mostly early adopters and enthusiasts, who typically have a home and and/or willing to spend some extra cash to get their parking garage wired.

  • IrisKuo

    @Casey Good points, but natural gas is forecast to displace coal in the next few decades in U.S. plants. We also had some executives at GreenBeat argue that EVs will not be an issue for the grid because cars typically charge at night, which is an off-peak time. Chargers are being built with the ability to help moderate grid load. It'll be interesting to watch whether that's enough to defer the issues you outlined.http://venturebeat.com/2010/11…/http://venturebeat.com/2010/12…/

blog comments powered by Disqus