2011 may mark the beginning of a golden era for entrepreneurs

(Editor’s note: Serial entrepreneur Steve Blank is the author of Four Steps to the Epiphany. A longer version of this story originally appeared on his blog.)

As we wrap up 2010, things might seem bleak. The common wisdom says that the chickens have all come home to roost from a disastrous series of economic decisions including outsourcing the manufacture of America’s physical goods. The pundits say the American dream is dead and this next decade will see the further decline and fall of the West and in particular of the United States.Personally, I think there’s a chance that the common wisdom is very, very wrong – and that the second decade of the 21st century may turn out to be the West’s – and in particular the United States’ – finest hour.

I believe that we will look back at this decade as the beginning of an economic revolution as important as the scientific revolution in the 16th century and the industrial revolution in the 18th century. We’re standing at the beginning of the entrepreneurial revolution.

This doesn’t mean just more technology stuff, though we’ll get that. This is a revolution that will permanently reshape business as we know it and, more importantly, change the quality of life across the entire planet for all who come after us.

You see, it’s only in the last few years that we’ve come to appreciate that past startups were constrained by:

  • long technology development cycles (how long it takes from idea to product),
  • the high cost of getting to first customers (how many dollars to build the product),
  • the structure of the venture capital industry (a limited number of VC firms each needing to invest millions per startups),
  • the expertise about how to build startups  (clustered in specific regions like Silicon Valley, Boston, New York, etc.),
  • the failure rate of new ventures (startups had no formal rules and were a hit or miss proposition),
  • the slow adoption rate of new technologies by the government and large companies.

What’s happening now is something more profound than a change in technology. What’s happening is that all the things that have been limits to startups and innovation are being removed.  At once.  Starting now.

Compressing the Product Development Cycle
In the past, the time to build a first product release was measured in months or even years as startups executed the founder’s vision of what customers wanted. This meant building every possible feature the founding team envisioned into a monolithic “release” of the product.

Yet time after time, after the product shipped, startups would find that customers didn’t use or want most of the features.  The founders were simply wrong about their assumptions about customer needs. The effort that went into making all those unused features was wasted.

Today startups have begun to build products differently.  Instead of building the maximum number of features, they look to deliver a minimum feature set in the shortest period of time.  This lets them deliver a first version of the product to customers in a fraction on the time.

For products that are simply “bits” delivered over the web, a first product can be shipped in weeks rather than years.

Startups Built For Thousands Rather than Millions of Dollars
Startups traditionally required millions of dollars of funding just to get their first product to customers. A company developing software would have to buy computers and license software from other companies and hire the staff to run and maintain it. A hardware startup had to spend money building prototypes and equipping a factory to manufacture the product.

Today, open source software has slashed the cost of software development from millions of dollars to thousands. For consumer hardware, no startup has to build their own factory as offshore manufacturers absorb the costs.

The cost of getting the first product out the door for an Internet commerce startup has dropped by a factor of a ten or more in the last decade.

The New Structure of the Venture Capital industry
The plummeting cost of getting a first product to market (particularly for Internet startups) has shaken up the venture capital industry. Venture capital used to be a tight club clustered around formal firms located in Silicon Valley, Boston, and New York. While those firms are still there (and getting larger), the pool of money that invests risk capital in startups has expanded, and a new class of investors has emerged.

New groups of VC’s, super angels, smaller than the traditional multi-hundred million dollar VC fund, can make small investments necessary to get a consumer internet startup launched. These angels make lots of early bets and double-down when early results appear. (And the results do appear years earlier then in a traditional startup.)

In addition to super angels, incubators like Y CombinatorTechStars and the 100+ plus others worldwide like them have begun to formalize seed-investing. They pay expenses in a formal 3-month program while a startup builds something impressive enough to raise money on a larger scale.

Finally, venture capital and angel investing is no longer a U.S. or Euro-centric phenomenon. Risk capital has emerged in China, India and other countries where risk taking, innovation and liquidity is encouraged, on a scale previously only seen in the U.S.

The emergence of incubators and super angels has dramatically expanded the sources of seed capital. The globalization of entrepreneurship means the worldwide pool of potential startups has increased at least ten fold since the turn of this century.

Entrepreneurship as Its Own Management Science
Over the last ten years, entrepreneurs began to understand that startups were not simply smaller versions of large companies. While companies execute business models, startups search for a business model. (Or more accurately, startups are a temporary organization designed to search for a scalable and repeatable business model.)

Instead of adopting the management techniques of large companies, which too often stifle innovation in a young start up, entrepreneurs began to develop their own management tools. U

sing the business model / customer development / agile development solution stack, entrepreneurs first map their assumptions (their business model) and then test these hypotheses with customers outside in the field (customer development) and use an iterative and incremental development methodology (agile development) to build the product.

When founders discover their assumptions are wrong, as they inevitably will, the result isn’t a crisis, it’s a learning event called a pivot — and an opportunity to change the business model.

The result: Startups now have tools that speed up the search for customers, reduce time to market and slash the cost of development.

Consumer Internet Driving Innovation

Today, consumers – specifically consumer Internet companies – drive innovation. When the product and channel are bits, adoption by 10’s and 100’s of millions of users can happen in years versus decades.

The barriers to entrepreneurship are not just being removed, they’re being replaced by innovations that are speeding up each step, some by a factor of ten.

And while innovation is moving at Internet speed, this won’t be limited to just internet commerce startups. It will spread to the enterprise and ultimately every other business segment.

The economic downturn in the United States has had an unexpected consequence for startups – it has created more of them. Young and old, innovators who are unemployed or underemployed now face less risk in starting a company.  They have a lot less to lose and a lot more to gain.

If we are at the cusp of a revolution as important as the scientific and industrial revolutions what does it mean? Revolutions are not obvious when they happen.

Yet it’s possible that we’ll look back to this decade as the beginning of our own revolution. We may remember this as the time when scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs were integrated into the fabric of society faster than they had ever been before. When the speed of how businesses operated changed forever. As the time when we reinvented the American economy and our Gross Domestic Product began to take off and the U.S. and the world reached a level of wealth never seen before.

It may be the dawn of a new era for a new American economy built on entrepreneurship and innovation – one that our children will look back on and marvel that when it was the darkest, we saw the stars.

  • http://twitter.com/palavalli Nagarjun Palavalli

    Fascinating story. I think you're right. The traditional models of starting a company have greatly changed allowing new entrepreneurs to deliver amazing innovations to consumers much quicker and for a fraction of the cost. Cloud computing especially is leading this revolution in the consumer internet arena. Great article.

  • mineralt

    A lot of what you are saying is now true of the music industry. For less than $5K, you can create a studio in your basement and record albums all day long. There are now more albums released per year than ever before, but sales are decreasing 10% a year on music sales. That's the thing. Because something is easier to do, will mean that more people will do it, and then it will be very difficult to break through all the noise. Ever wonder why ACDC is still selling out at 60 years old, it's because the “new ACDC” can't break through all the noise. That's the conundrum.

  • http://twitter.com/Cost2Drive Cost2Drive

    Completely agree with your optimistic view, though the global aspect is kind of a wildcard. Should be an exciting year!

  • http://throughput.us/ Jeff 'SKI' Kinsey

    >> The pundits say the American dream is dead >>As is almost always the case, they are wrong. As is the administration. For those poor souls that traded in their dreams for the promise of “change” you could somehow [magically] believe in, I feel sad and sorry… to the entrepreneurs and would be entrepreneurs, I say, “The timing has never been better to live your dreams.”Thanks for sharing Steve.

  • knowledgenotebook

    How many bureaucrats in charge of economy and commerce have read Steve Blanks's writings on start-up and entrepreneurship? Those who are close to political circles should get this guru up close to the decision-makers.

  • imax

    I can't for the life of me see why 2011 is an inflection point in respect to any of these points. I think the easier an opportunity gets, the more people will chase the same opportunity – eventually it becomes a lottery. I prefer to stick to the hard stuff, where you have less competition. And, separating out web-tech which may be getting easier in some quarters, real science and engineering is getting harder and harder to commercialize as the years go on, simply because we are getting into more complex systems. Nice hypothesis, but I am pretty sure it can't be generalized.

  • http://throughput.us/ Jeff 'SKI' Kinsey

    Of course I can only speak to my affinity as to “why 2011″ is a cross roads: otherwise smart people (like Tom Peters) have to admit (IMNSHO) that after two whole years, much like Jimmy Carter's promise to “dismantle Washington DC” in favor of a better/simpler/whatever approach, this administration has also proven they are not up to the challenge. Unless we can resurrect Ronald Reagan, the only hope for many talented Americans lies in taking charge of their life as an entrepreneur. And yes, this is vastly over generalized to fit in this small comment box.The clock is ticking…

  • imax

    Thanks for the reply. I do think this decade will be an interesting one for VC. I think there is too much cash in the system and this will have to sort itself out as lower tier fund managers fail to get new funds. I also think there will be two tiers of VC emerging – the big end guys with billion dollar funds that pump cash into deals to force an exit, and then the smaller funds looking for cash-effective smaller deals, sort of like the ones you are talking about. As to the globalization of VC, only the latter category can spread. Large funds just won't be generally supported outside of the bay area.If you look outside the US, VC really only exists where there is direct government support of some sort. I think this will continue to be the case simply because only the US has an institutionalized M&A market. For the rest of us we have intermittent local exits, but we primarily look to US corporations in just a few sectors to give us the trade sale valuations we need to make it all worth while.In the US, I see the role of government in VC as simply getting out of the way – removing unnecessary red tape and taxes on share options and the like. Taxing profits as income is sort of inevitable for the Tier 1 guys if they continue to boast the profits they do – they should stay quiet. Outside the US, governments actually have to invest cash into funds to keep any sort of investment continuity alive. None of this applies to China of course where free market logic doesn't really apply…

  • mattdyor

    Steve – can you provide a couple of examples of companies that have used the business model / customer development / agile development solution stack approach particularly well? A lot of companies talk about how they should have followed this approach, but I have not found any examples of companies who are applying it successfully. Thanks for the post, and hopefully for the follow up!

  • http://theyec.org/is-execution-more-important-than-ideas/ Is Execution More Important Than Ideas? | Young Entrepreneur Council (YEC)

    [...] truth is, the pivot and the economics behind the lean start up methodology are at the heart of a very real entrepreneurial revolution that we are in the midst of. However, I also see many dangers in this new way of building businesses. The new rallying cry [...]

  • http://blog.evergrow.co.za/index.php/will-2011-mark-a-new-golden-age-for-entrepreneurs/ Will 2011 mark a new golden age for entrepreneurs? | Evergrow blog

    [...] for 2011 marking the start of a golden era for entrepreneurs. As Steve Blank highlights in a recent VentureBeat article, a number of developments have emerged simultaneously to counter several traditional small and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus