Is Bill Gates a green hypocrite?

Well, well, Bill Gates.

Today came news that the Microsoft founder, philanthropist and green investor has invested in a $60 million round for NEOS GeoSolutions, a Houston-based firm that uses data analysis and geophysical sensors to help oil and gas companies decide where to drill. NEOS’s backers also include Goldman Sachs, Kleiner Perkins, Passport Capital and, now, Saudi-based oil and industrial conglomerate Energy Capital Group, which joined as a new investor with Gates.

It’s a fairly surprising and — dare we say — hypocritical move for Gates, considering that he’s been a vocal champion of green energy in the past. He’s chairman of the board of alternative energy advocacy group American Energy Innovation Council, which includes business leaders like GE’s Jeffrey Immelt and Xerox’s Ursula Burns.

“The innovation that would be the most important for the world is a way of generating electricity that’s less than half as expensive as the way we do it today but has no bad environmental effects, and, in particular, emits no CO2,” Gates says (italics mine) in an AEIC video embedded below. I’ve reached out to the AEIC for comment, but haven’t heard back.

In fact, the AEIC’s recommendations includes a call for the U.S. to invest $16 billion a year in innovative energy research and development, even hinting that the U.S. spends too much money — $16 billion every 16 days — overseas for oil.

Gates is also an investor in cleantech venture capitalist Vinod Khosla’s green fund. He has backed biofuels company Sapphire Energy, nuclear plant designer TerraPowerlow-emissions car motors startup EcoMotor, and Pacific Ethanol. And the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation headquarters was designed as a green building, with a roof that doubles as a natural habitat for birds and is sustained via rainwater.

On the flip side, calling Gates a hyprocrite may be a little harsh. For one, he’s likely diversifying his portfolio of investments. For another, it’s not easy — or even realistic — to be 100 percent green when most of the world still runs on fossil fuels and the majority of renewable energies are still more expensive than traditional fuel sources. Immelt’s GE, for all of its investment in cleantech, still makes jet engines and traditional lightbulbs (though it studiously markets greener versions of both).

And on the bright side, while NEOS supplies oil companies, it also counts gas companies among its clients. Natural gas is a much cleaner fossil fuel than coal, is forecast to oust coal in the next few decades, and big oil companies like Chevron and Exxon have invested in natural gas acquisitions and projects. So smart investors are looking to bet on the commodity, which isn’t as bad for the environment as coal.

I’d venture that Gates’s green contributions and high-profile role in green advocacy probably outweighs this one deal, but it’ll be interesting to see  if he’ll continue to bang the drum for alternative energy with one hand and bet on oil and gas exploration with the other.

[Top image via Green Diary]

  • http://twitter.com/cthorm Casey Thormahlen

    Iris, this is kind of hyperbolic, and I think you are being far too strict and ideological about what “green” means. NEOS's technology will help fine tune oil and gas exploration so that exploration takes less time and results in fewer drilling locations. Primarily this will save money, but it will also reduce environmental damage.

  • IrisKuo

    Casey, appreciate you pointing out that NEOS's technology could result in less impact on the environment. Like I say in the piece, it may be too harsh to call Gates a hypocrite when most of the world runs still on fossil fuels, and plenty of money to be made doing so. That said, it isn't a stretch to point out that he's betting with one hand on more oil & gas exploration but championing clean energy — and suggesting too much money is spent on oil and gas — with the other.

  • seismoa

    Wonder why Bill Gates seems so smart? It's because he hedges his bet. To the unknowing author, this may seem hypocritical, but making two seemingly opposing bets is called hedging risk. He can't be wrong both ways, so he will always be right on something.Think that political lobbyist only donate to democrats or republicans? The smart money donates to both parties because they are never quite sure who will be elected. It's called hedging riskThink that hedge fund managers are just cowboys with big wallets that buy everything wild and new? The successful ones bet both ways. Its called hedging riskWonder why buy car insurance when you don't intend to crash you car? It called hedging your risk. Unless you are okay with being wrong a lot (and I am NOT), you had better learn to hedge your risk. BTW, Bill Gates is not a hypocrite

  • http://www.solarinertia.com/how-solar-and-oil-can-coexist-in-saudi-arabia/ How solar and oil can coexist in Saudi Arabia | SOLAR INERTIA

    [...] have won investment lately aim to make the extraction and refining of fossil fuels more efficient. NEOS GeoSolutions, which has the backing of Bill Gates and Goldman Sachs, uses geophysical sensors and data analysis [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus