Is one million electric cars by 2015 too ambitious?

In a renewed push for clean energy, President Obama called for one million electric cars to be on American roads by 2015 last month. But is that goal realistic?

The government released a report this week saying that by its “conservative” estimates for 2015, the electric car supply in the U.S. will total 1.2 million cars. One eyebrow-raising note in its estimates, though: The report projects supply of the Nissan Leaf (pictured) in the U.S. this year to be 25,000 cars. Nissan has reportedly delivered just 106 cars as of last week, although it says it’s ramping up production in March. The company has about 20,000 reservations, and reportedly 40 percent of those reservations have become purchases.

And, tough-to-predict Leaf deliveries or not, at least one group is predicting the country won’t reach that goal: Pike Research estimates that U.S. electric vehicle supply in 2015 will be closer to 841,000 cars.

“The vendor’s planned production of vehicles don’t often match demand, and while there is greater demand than the small supply today, we don’t expect that to continue very far into the future,” said John Gartner, Pike Research analyst. “For the one million figure to be reached, it would require either a faster reduction in the price of the batteries than has been forecast, or sustained federal incentives that offset their higher cost.”

The government’s report could be conservative since it doesn’t include key automakers like Toyota, which has the plug-in Prius planned for 2012, and startup Coda, which says it wants to sell an ambitious 14,000 of its electric sedans in its first year of production (the car is slated to become available late this year). According to the report, the all-electric Nissan Leaf and partially electric Chevrolet Volt (pictured, below) will make up a large part of the projected supply, with 120,000 Volts to be produced every year from 2012 to 2015, and 15,000 Volts to be made available this year. By the government’s estimation, the Leaf is expected to have 25,000 cars available this year in the U.S., then increase in supply each year until it totals 300,000 cars made for the U.S. by 2015.

Some agree with this optimistic outlook. Management consultancy PRTM’s North American automotive practice director Oliver Hamizeh said one million electric vehicles by 2015 is a “realistic goal” and argues that the “cool” in-car connectivity and monitoring features offered by electric cars will increase demand for the cars.

Still, electric car skeptics abound. Venture capitalist and billionaire Vinod Khosla has come out against electric cars many times, even arguing recently that by 2025, the world’s supply of lithium will not be enough to power the batteries needed for electric vehicles.

But Gartner dismissed that, saying, “The consensus is that lithium is in plentiful supply that even a few million EVs will take only a small fraction of the annual lithium (supply).”

ExxonMobil executive William M. Colton said today he wasn’t a fan of electric cars, which may not be surprising considering he works for an oil company, but his concern that batteries are too expensive and, as Gartner suggested, are unlikely to come down in price anytime soon is common among consumers and analysts. Electric car batteries can account for up to half of a car’s price, and even with federal and state incentives, electric car sticker prices are still higher than many gas-guzzling alternatives.

But while consumers look at sticker prices, businesses look at return on investment. Major companies like Frito Lay, FedEx, Staples and GE have committed to buying electric cars and electric trucks. GE announced last year it would buy 25,000 electric cars for its corporate fleet, starting with 12,000 from GM, many of them likely Chevrolet Volts. Brian Hansel, chief executive of Smith Electric, which is delivering 176 electric trucks to Frito Lay this year, says customers can expect return on investment from fuel savings and saved maintenance costs within three to four years of purchase.

For its part, the government is trying to spur sales and innovation. It is pledging to invest in electric vehicle research on subjects like advanced batteries and drivetrains and is proposing that the $7,500 federal tax credit for electric car buyers be turned into a rebate so the savings are visible when a customer buys the car, rather than when they file their taxes.

  • shashank261

    Electric cars are slow and powerless and I expect Hybrid cars to do well than them. Toyota Prius has shown the way and its now upto others to follow the suit.

  • Mexjewel

    Underestimated! Innovation and “keeping up with the Jones” will fuel (sic) sales. Just watch.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Paul-Scott/1322599804 Paul Scott

    You clearly haven't driven either the Volt or the LEAF. Both of these cars have excellent acceleration and handling characteristics. Both are very fun to drive and have no negative environmental or national security issues like typical internal combustion vehicles do.

  • http://twitter.com/blueandgold63 kent beuchert

    The question of whether a milion Evs will be on the road by 2015 begs the question of whether theirpresence can possibly make any measureable difference. They would represent less than one half of one percent of the vehicles out there. Want to tell me exactly what the advantage of pushing a million drivers into buying into a technology that simply isn't competitive, either in terms of economics or practicality. EVs with a100 miles (usually less, much less) of driving range are virtually useless. Only the Tesla Model S EV will provide a practical and economically sensible alternative – and only atits price level of $60K +. Lower price level EVs will not become practical for awhile yet. Let's not get all stupid and try to obtain the many potential advantages of electric cars until they have come down in price and can match the Model S driving range of 300 miles and recharge times of one hour. I'm sick and tired of listening to morons like Obama who are acting from purely political motives in pushing all this junk.

  • HM64

    Its a shame VC's don't invest in D1G1TAL DR1VES that would lower the cost and time to market of electric vehicles.

  • creative_solutions

    To: Whom it may concernFor: The American People.From: Edward Heath Owner/Operator of New Ideas and Innovations, LLCe-mail: edwardselectriccar at yahoo dot com address; P.O. Box 171, North Branford, Connecticut 06471 – 9998 In response to the N. Y. Times article on February 10, 2011 from the Exxon Executive, William M. Colton; Hello Americans; my name is Edward and I believe that I have the technologies needed for “Sustained Ultra-Extended Electric Vehicle Travel”! (SUEEVT) If you are tired of paying $50.00 or more for a fill-up (gasoline or diesel) for your vehicle then I might have the solution and I am asking for your help. I am seeking a total of $ 4.8 million dollars for research / development and to build prototype vehicles (off the shelf, not custom made) to prove my technologies work; (I know it sounds like a lot of money and it is, but it also goes quite quickly- but not to me but for the business, I can assure you of that). The funds would go to the shop, vehicles (initially named EEV-3 for Edwards Electric Vehicle, and the 3 stands for the three different energy forms saved or conserved while driving the EEV-3and they are: coal, crude oil and natural gas), machinery, equipment, CAD/CAM software, international patent protection, components / parts / assemblies, employee payroll and other operating expenses. I request amounts between $1.00 and $100.00 or whatever amount you are happy with. Please send check or money order to address above with your name and address so that I may send you a thank you card and in the event that my technology works and I get compensated by licensing this technology, I will send you my “1 -2 Flush Genuine Toilet Water Saver” (retail value $39.99) as my way of saying “thank you”. The U.S. Government, Venture Capital / Angel Investors, and vehicle manufacturers do not want to assist me in my endeavor so I humbly ask for your much appreciated assistance in this very serious matter! I have been pursuing financing for over a year now. They are all afraid of “big oil” companies. I am not. Big oil usually equates to big trouble. ‘Can you say’ “greed” and Lobbyists” who are only concerned for their well being and not for the well being for us as a country, they are very selfish!If you have any questions, please feel free to send me an email to: edwardselectriccar at yahoo dot com. I have patents on other energy and / or natural resource conserving innovations and I am a serious innovator, I am not a nut, far from it. I am trying to use my intelligence and engineering experience to make our country great again and to greatly reduce our dependence on foreign oil from countries that do not like us. This technology will not lose jobs (not even for the oil companies because we as a nation still need kerosene, heating oil and gasoline for small engines), but rather would increase jobs here in the States by having at least one electric vehicle conversion center in each state. That is something that we do not have right now. The conversion to mostly electric vehicles would take 5-7 years, not just a couple of years.I thank you for your financial assistance, especially during this recession and tough economic / financial times! The payoff would be fantastic for our country though if I can prove my technologies by driving across America in one of the EEV-3 retro-fitted vehicles in 3 or less charging cycles! People would not be afraid in purchasing electric vehicles equipped with this technology. By the way, in case you were wondering, my technologies are NOT based on the principles of “perpetual motion”. My company has been around for 5 ½ years, working on technologies that save good Americans as yourself, money, energy and / or natural resources like our clean fresh water. Please help the United States (U.S.) and us as Americans regain our strength as world leaders in national security and innovations that help all of us live better lives, now and for generations to come!Thank you all again for your understanding and assistance!Sincerely and Honestly Submitted: Edward Heath – Owner / Chief Design Engineer of New Ideas and Innovations, LLCEdward Heath _______________________________

  • http://venturebeat.com/2011/06/21/nissan-leaf-us-production-earthquake/ Japan earthquake could delay U.S. production of Nissan Leaf | VentureBeat

    [...] U.S. government has set ambitious targets for both the Volt and Leaf, based on its goal of having more than 1 million electric cars on the road by 2015. The U.S. government expects GM to sell around 500,000 Volts by 2015 and Nissan to sell 300,000 [...]

  • http://www.goldfeed.in/Games/2011/japan-earthquake-could-delay-u-s-production-of-nissan-leaf/ Japan earthquake could delay U.S. production of Nissan Leaf | Mix Play News Games

    [...] the Volt and Leaf, based on its goal of having more than 1 million electric cars on the road b&#121…. The U.S. government expects GM to sell around 500,000 Volts [...]

  • http://www.empoweredgrid.com/2011/10/06/survey-predicts-uphill-battle-for-evs-implications-for-smart-grid/ Survey Predicts: Uphill Battle for EVs. Implications for Smart Grid? – The Empowered Grid

    [...] EV forecasts for electric vehicles have been good, and with President Obama’s stated goal of 1 million EVs on US roads by 2015, the concept is at least part of the American consciousness (probably more so than the concept of [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus