3 tips every entrepreneur should know

(Editor’s note: Doug Collom is vice dean and an adjunct lecturer on venture capital and entrepreneurship for Wharton|San Francisco. He submitted this story to VentureBeat.)

Starting companies is hard.  And it’s critical to make sure that your venture is pointing in the right direction from the moment it leaves the launch pad. Any misdirection or miscue on the basic organizational steps can be fatal.It’s a lot like launching a rocket aimed at the moon—if the launch is only 2 degrees off target at blast-off, it will miss by hundreds of thousands of miles.

There’s no end to the advice and opinions entrepreneurs will hear in a company’s early days, but three basic rules that every company founder should take into consideration:

Keep it simple – In setting up the capital structure and the first equity of the company, many founders either try to innovate or try to accommodate the wishes and desires of every co-founder and early stage employee. The result is too much complexity.

In most cases where there is more than one founder (probably on the order of over 80 percent of startups), the stock should be split equally. If it isn’t an even split, then you should re-evaluate whether your co-participants really deserve to be in the “founder” category. Establish uniform stock vesting provisions that apply equally to both founders (although maybe with some “credit” for pre-formation activities) and early stage employees.

Stay away from unconventional employment terms that differ from founder-to-founder or employee-to-employee. And make sure and outside board members (including, if you have one, your advisory board), are compensated equally.

If you fail to keep the capital structure and the equity incentive arrangements absolutely consistent with convention, then every investor you approach and every manager you hire will require an explanation. Stay focused on the business plan, not the infrastructure of the company.

Select your business entity wisely – If you are planning on raising professional capital, whether from an angel group or from a venture capital firm, use a Subchapter C corporation incorporated in the state of Delaware.

LLCs simply do not work. Investors categorically will not put money into an entity that will require them to file annual federal and state tax returns to reflect the pass-through of operating gains and losses (as LLC’s do).

Subchapter S corporations are also a poor choice if the fundraising process is likely to begin in the first year. Sub S companies are viable only with investors who are “natural persons” (which automatically is a problem with VC firms and most angel groups) and only where there is a single class of stock (i.e., not preferred stock, which is typically the class of stock given out to angels and VCs).

A Delaware corporation is the preferred choice among states to choose from—most law firms will recommend this for a number of reasons, not the least of which it will save you the expense of reincorporating to Delaware in the event you are successful enough to consider an IPO in some distant future. (Fun fact: some 70 percent of the US publicly held companies today are incorporated in Delaware.)

Wait until the time is right before forming your company – Many founders are in a rush to go out and incorporate and set up the founders’ stock arrangements and stock plan. WAIT.

It doesn’t take much time to form and organize a company—with three general exceptions:

  • You have promised your co-founders and/or anticipated early stage employees specific allocations of stock, and they are tired of waiting to get their hands on the stock certificates.
  • You are about to enter into a contract with a strategic partner or a significant vendor or a major customer, and either they want to see a corporate entity on the signature line, or you are worried about potential personal liability if you sign as an individual.
  • You are highly confident you are going to get funded.

Absent these circumstances, focus on the business.

Of course, there are many other matters that need to be addressed almost daily by any founder, but these three rules are likely to save you a lot of aggravation later on. More importantly, they will enable you to keep your focus where it belongs—on your business plan and persuading the investment community to see the potential in your company that you see.

  • still_like_startups

    Helpful article. However I would like to add to the third point about forming the company. It is essential to have everyone under contract before working for the company. I speak from personal experience of seeing a lead technical person not sign a contract for personal reasons, despite being a integral part of the team and agreeing to a getting a certain percentage of the stock. Well, the startup was close to piloting, the person turned around and demanded majority stock or he would walk out with his software as he had not signed the work for hire contract. As the startup was pre funding, the idea being show proof of concept with early adopters and then raise round A, this situation led to a total collapse of the startup. There was no good way to recover from the situation when substantial work has been done and the company is still fluid.

  • mukesh76

    Hello Doug,Nice to see your article. Hope things are well. We recently went through the exercise of equity structure and company formation. I think the rule of splitting equity equal doesn't apply in the all situation. If the team feels equal distribution is not fair, my recommendation is to put the issue on table and have discussion. Generally, equal distribution is the path of least resistance. Having a discussion on unequal distribution is difficult, but it is also a true test (in our case it was the first test) of whether founders can have difficult conversation and come to the agreement on something which I believe is one of the most important issue for an early stage startup.In our case, there were many factors that made us to believe that equal distribution wouldn't be fair. We ended up with unequal distribution but didn't adopt any scientific/quantitative approach to it. It was primarily a verbal discussion around what are the key success factors for the company, and what everyone brings to table. Also, different people committed full-time at different times. That was one of the factors. Agree with the choice of entity. However, I also think that the formation should not be delayed too much. If at least one person is committed full-time, the formation should be done. Not only to protect legally, but it also forces to have equity discussion. Also, having a formal entity and defined compensation brings the level of commitment that is required once you are beyond ideation phase.Looking forward to more posts from you. MukeshCo-Founder, SVOOV.COM

  • pbreit

    I've heard that registering in Delaware is generally bad for a new company because it just adds to your responsibilities. You still need to file in your home state.

  • dougcollom

    Mukesh: the important of this decision on the split of founders' equity cannot be overestimated. I agree with everything you see on the subject, maybe with a slightly different perspective. I start with the premise that if prospective co-founders do not have the same level of vision, commitment and passion about the business, then there is a big question about whether the “lesser” prospect really deserves to be a co-founder. Stated otherwise, if there is an uneven split on the equity, then it begs the question whether the holder with the lesser split should be tagged as a co-founder in the first instance. Although I have only my own experience to rely upon, in each instance where co-founders have taken an unequal split, the allocation itself has become a source of contention in the long run, leading to the collapse of the company (probably about half a dozen instances over the last two decades). As a result, I am biased toward setting a high bar for who qualifies to be a founder in the first instance, with the preconception of starting with an event split.Nice to hear from you.

  • dougcollom

    It's true that if you incorporate in Delaware but are actuallly setting up operations in a different state, depending on the level of operations you will have to “qualify” to do business in that state as well. This typically entails the need to file corporate franchise taxes in both states. But the level of franchise tax for early stage companies in most cases is only a few hundred dollars. The benefits of being in Delaware are (i) you'll never have to reincorporate if you execute successfully on your growth plans (e.g., an IPO!); (ii) you'll be incorporated in a state where everyone fully understands the way the corporate law there works (so investors' counsel doesn't have to get educated about the potential issues of the corporations code of another state); and (iii) Delaware is the most manager- and investor-friendly in terms of how the corporations code works. That's why Delaware as a situs for incorporation is so popular.

  • dougcollom

    At least for venture-backed companies that are based in California, where they are represented by law counsel with a significant venture capital/startup company practice, as a general premise the predominant majority of startups are set up as Delaware companies, for the reasons I have mentioned. I am not trying to promote Delaware, just stating the facts.

  • http://about.me/rocco Rocco Tarasi

    I agree with still_like_startups. I was a little surprised to see the third point, as I think its the first time that I've ever heard someone advise to delay forming the company. You have intellectual property issues, ownership issues, vesting issues, liability issues… I can speak from my prior experience also – incorporate early so that everything is clear and documented.

  • http://twitter.com/Pquatrini Phillip Quatrini

    I have used LLC's and before that limited partnerships for years with success. It does require setting up blocker corporations in cases where you have tax exempt investors. It really depends on whether the investors want to take the tax losses out of the company or view them as an valuable asset left inside a C-corporation.

  • http://www.freeenterprise.com/tips-all-potential-entrepreneurs-need-to-know/ American Free Enterprise. Dream Big. | Tips All Potential Entrepreneurs Need to Know

    [...] VentureBeat has come up with three vital tips for entrepreneurs that will help them move successfully from their initial business idea to making that idea a reality. Keep it simple – In setting up the capital structure and the first equity of the company, many founders either try to innovate or try to accommodate the wishes and desires of every co-founder and early stage employee. The result is too much complexity. [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus