Why the best iPad business apps won't be in the App Store

Editor’s note: This discussion about enterprise mobility is one of the five themes we will be focusing on at the VentureBeat Mobile Summit, on April 25-26. We’ve carefully invited the top executives in mobile to discuss the biggest challenges of the day, which, if solved, can lead to much faster growth in the industry. And at our enterprise session, we’ll have top executives around the table from a number of companies, including Verizon, AT&T, Cisco, Salesforce, Box.net, and more. (If you think you should be part of the discussion, you can apply for a ticket.)

Don’t expect to find the core applications that run the pistons of a business as native apps in Apple’s App Store. With a few exceptions, the future is touch-enabled web applications that will bring a more complete version of a vendor’s feature set to any tablet.

I’ll say it more explicitly:  Native apps are for phones, gadgets and games.  Touch-enabled web apps are for tablets and broad business applications.

The iPhone’s size has almost necessitated an alternative user experience for business apps, but the iPad’s screen real estate does not suffer that limitation.

The iPad has been in the market for over one year.  Conspicuously absent from Smartsheet’s Top iPad Apps for Business lists — produced over the last 8 months by 10 industry watchers — are any cross-business operating apps tackling customer relationship management (CRM), accounting, project management and the like.

Smart software companies are building tablet access into their core products by touch-enabling their existing web applications.  For some vendors with form-based solutions, the effort may be fairly simple, for others with rich desktop-class UIs, it is more complex.

Some serious business apps have native tablet versions, but they are either narrow business functions or small carve-outs of their overall solution. Here are some examples:

Some examples of companies with broader business operations applications that are benefiting from the touch-enabled web app approach are:

The key reasons to go native on the iPhone / iPad have been:  performance, access to device features (geo-location, camera, etc….), offline support, and most importantly, an entry in the App Store Directory (this will be the only remaining benefit to building native business apps in 12- 18 months).

But the following dynamics in the tablet ecosystem are predicting the demise of that native apps advantage:

Competition Among Tablets Will Dramatically Improve Performance
Intense competition in the tablet market will drive hardware, browser and connectivity performance closer and closer to parity with PCs.  Note the step up in hardware power from the iPad to the recently released Motorola Xoom and iPad 2.  Vendors do not build native apps for PCs and Laptops any more, and the reasons for that will be just as valid for tablets.

HTML5 Will Erase Native App’s Device Advantage
HTML5 will give browser apps powers that until recently have only been accessible by native apps such as instant on, access to camera, location, and off-line.  And, unless it’s a game, most apps require connectivity to be useful anyway.  (Here’s a good write-up on this, and here’s another VentureBeat piece on HTML5 versus native.)

Web Apps Will Outpace and Outreach the Natives (adding features vs platforms)
As more tablets come to market on more operating systems, ISVs will become weighted down building redundant apps for each OS.  This will inherently come at the expense of adding more features to a single web app.  Inherent in any application development toolkit are its limitations, and Apple’s is no different.  Richer experiences are possible with today’s browser development tools.

Businesses Will Favor App Stores that Include “Bookmark a Link” Apps
Apple forbids “pointers” or “very thin wrappers” to touch-enabled web business apps.  This benefits Apple, but not business users.  There are a host of good business apps that work on the iPad browser, but they’re not present in the App Store.  This is slowing the growth of the iPad as a business tool.  The marketplace that lists compatible business apps will have a broad audience – one that expects them.

The debate will continue on both the mobile and tablet fronts and it depends on a multitude of factors, but ultimately businesses will choose which approach delivers a more compelling user experience for their specific application.  ZDNet reports on three of the key business scenarios prevalent with the iPad, which includes 1) sales people out in the field, 2) executives on an overnight trip, and 3) warehouse managers, retail floor staff, medical staff, and anybody else that needs real access to apps while on their feet.

A tablet untethers the user categories above from a desk if it can handle typically more comprehensive operational business applications that can cover a diversity of business needs. For example,  this video shows the owner of a 109-year-old lumber operation bringing automation to the mill floor via the iPad.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVDNZhaUSok?rel=0&w=640&h=390%5D

For this company and the millions just like it, the need for rich tablet-ready business apps is real, but native apps aren’t there yet. Thankfully, there is an app for that. But you’ll have to look beyond the App Store.

Brent Frei is the founder of Smartsheet, an online project management and collaboration tool. He submitted this story to VentureBeat as part of a series leading up to our Mobile Summit later this month.

  • mikellewellyn

    A nice summary, but I can't help but think that this is the same set of arguments that have been rolled out for web apps ever since the web, basically. And yet still people generally prefer Windows-native desktop apps (or Mac OS X native), and generally prefer iPad-native apps today. And as hardware performance increases, the native apps will also get better and better, and as more hardware capability is added, they will be supported first by the native platform.So while I would agree that in general business apps will be served via the web, I doubt that it will be the “best” business apps. It seems more likely that it will be the simplest and most basic business apps that will be served via the web, and advanced/demanding/innovative apps will be native. As is still generally the case with a desktop, despite the fantastic web apps that Google and others are making.I hope I am wrong, as the web has of course many significant advantages for everyone. But I can't see native apps being marginalised any time soon – the user benefits are still too significant.

  • brentfrei

    Mike, very few business software ISVs even make a native desktop app these days. Certainly Microsoft Dynamics/CRM and Intuit QuickBooks would be good examples of mainstream business app ISVs that still do. However, their web app versions are where the growth is. Salesforce, WorkDay, SuccessFactors, etc… all web apps. I'd done a small project for SmallBizTrends a while back that entailed generating a comprehensive list of small business accounting vendors. http://bit.ly/hs6kD2 The top half of the list are SaaS-based ISVs and the bottom half are desktop apps. Plenty of both, but the growth is in the top half and the bottom half are trying to get to SaaS across the board (Sage, Msft, ..)

  • wungwoo

    No doubt about it, you have to jailbreak to get the good stuff.http://www.web-anonymity.at.tc

  • http://profiles.google.com/missingxtension Missing Xtension

    Well to say that this is a well though out point is underwhelming.There are too many industries that cannot ever move to alternative platforms.Lets think for a moment about the automotive industry.Automotive repair requires information for cars ranging from several years, gigs of information.The current leader mitchel international with on demmand, collision repair services, manager, glassmate and several products that fill just about any void is a good example. Sure some companies like alldata offer web browser login, but good luck printing with your Ipad. Dont expect much mechanic shops to set up an Iplatter of producs just to acomodate printing. You can never expect to do any alignments either as Hunter Enginering does have some kind of iphone app, but you still need a hunter machine, then it only serves the same function as an accessory that already included . Then in the manufacturing, well there always needs to be support for legacy.The how are you gonna program modules with gm's tech2, ford IDS, hondas HDS, or even BMW wich has a linux native with a freaking IPAD. Ipad doesn't even offer usb. At least gm has a winmo/wince program.Then lets say you run a multi level organization selling stuff, sure you can allow for your distributors to do medial stuff, but when it comes to making a sale. You still need to be able to send forms, print, receive, and most important type at a decent speed. All that's left for a consumption device is to see if a creditor has approved an application, because submitting it to another creditor just doesn't seem like a good Ipad strategy.You can accommodate just about anything into an environment, but the device has to at least meet some where in the line. A web browser is not all you need.

  • Pakk1969

    “Richer experiences are possible with today’s browser development tools” then native development tools? Who are you kidding? And since when are browsers free from toolkit limitations? Give me a break. You were making a good case until you dropped this half-assed statement.

blog comments powered by Disqus