Google's Music Beta first look: it's miserable

Google’s Music Beta is supposed to provide users with a way to access the music anywhere, anytime as easily as physically possible.

But it’s just not that easy.

I’ve spent the past few hours trying to navigate my way through Music Beta and ended up finding new frustrations at nearly every turn. Music Beta in its current form is far from what we’d expect from a Google product— it’s a web of confusing programs without a lot of instruction as to how to actually get to the music you want to hear.

The process starts with this little bugger: the Music Manager, pictured below. Once you jump through Google’s hurdles and land an invitation to Music Beta, you have to download the manager and use that program exclusively to upload music. It’s easy enough to navigate — it’ll pull songs from your iTunes library or from specific folders you select — but there isn’t a simple drag and drop option like on Dropbox (which I can also use to stream music to my mobile devices). The software cryptically shows up in system preferences. The app itself is also pretty slow when you run it the first time.

Once you upload music to Google’s remote servers, you are supposed to be able to access these files from any device — including mobile Android devices. I tried downloading the newest Music app onto an Android device to try it out myself. No dice. I was instead forced to transfer some music from my computer onto the device before I was able to access Music Beta, and even then the file transfer program didn’t work. So much for that idea.

Luckily I was still able to access the web application on a tablet and on a laptop. I played a few of the songs that I uploaded to find that the lossless quality (yes, I’m a bit of an audio snob) was, for the most part, preserved. Music Beta plays files at a max bit rate of around 320 kilobytes per second — which is a little past the threshold where untrained ears can tell the difference in music quality. But I was struck by just how ridiculously similar the whole experience feels when compared to Grooveshark, which has been around for some time. The difference is that I can access any song I want that’s available on the Internet on Grooveshark with relatively little difficulty.

There’s one spot that Google beats Grooveshark, however: Google caches music that you’ve recently listened to, along with a few playlists and albums you select. That’s supposed to keep you sated when there isn’t any access to the Internet. Grooveshark has mobile apps that also let you stream music, but it isn’t cached in plain sight and is easily reachable — and it was also pulled from Apple’s App Store. That, and Google’s Music Beta is explicitly “entirely legal,” said Hugo Barra, director of product management for Google.

Unfortunately, that means Google is missing a key part of the cloud music puzzle — the ability to re-download songs from that server somewhere out in the cloud onto other devices, removing the need to physically transfer those files. There are a lot of legal ramifications associated with re-downloading, but at this point if there is any company that should be able to iron out the details, it’s Google. And we can use a number of other applications, like Dropbox, to do the same thing — just not with mobile devices.

It should also be noted that this “caching feature” is the same mechanism that got Kongregate, an online marketplace for flash-based games, in trouble and was a factor that led to it eventually being booted off the marketplace. Sure, this is Google’s proprietary software, but it isn’t doing itself any favors by throwing its support behind a feature like this when it summarily banned an app that was literally no threat to the Android Marketplace for doing the same thing. Kongregate has since modified its app to suit Google’s demands for the Android Marketplace.

android eating appleOn top of all this, Music Beta can upload files that I’ve purchased on iTunes. I’m not sure how long Apple would let something like this fly, seeing as it is pretty angsty when it comes to other devices and applications synching up with iTunes. The Palm Pre, for example, tried to pretend it was an iPhone in iTunes, and Apple just changed the software every time to block that feature.

We’ve contacted Apple for a comment on the subject but haven’t heard back from them yet.

In the grand scheme of things, these are pretty minor complaints. But taken as a whole they really ruin the experience — especially because we have come to expect very good things from Google and the rest of the smartphone manufacturing industry. The cloud music game is too high-profile of a game to flop.

You can bet that Apple will come out of the gates swinging — along with just about any other competitor. Google was pretty jovial about how it was handling its most significant competitor in the smartphone market. But you need to be able to back up your position with superior applications and devices. I personally prefer the Android experience over the iPhone, but I will happily march over to Apple’s side if they can deliver a better cloud-based music experience.

Google hasn’t flopped just yet. After all, this is a closed beta — it’s only available to U.S. users for the time being and there are plenty of kinks to work out. Still, I’m hoping that my next several hours with the service are more exciting than the catastrophe the first few were.

  • http://twitter.com/sequential Brian Kenney

    One should note that the picture shows a fist smashing a monitor displaying OSX. iTunes favoritism perhaps?

  • http://www.stevebartz.com/words Steve Bartz

    These things are going to involve some setup time, but the real question is: is the time investment/effort worth it? Come back in a week after you get it all setup and tell us how the actual use experience is please.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jonraphaelson Jon Raphaelson

    If it was displaying Windows, would it be Windows Media favoritism? Does iTunes even compete with this right now?

  • http://twitter.com/pasmith Peter Smith

    I'd love to hear a comparison to Amazon's Cloud Service, which sounds very similar (aside from the 'smart playlist' stuff). Program to upload, ability to read iTunes directories, and all that.

  • http://profiles.google.com/rabahrahil Rabah Rahil

    MOG is way better than any music service I have tried. This looks a lot like the article hinted at very “groovesharky”. I just store my iTunes Library on Dropbox and then use MOG or Grooveshark app (jailbroken only) when I am on my iPhone. I don't see how Google or Apple is going to top the music experience delivered by MOG. Simply top notch!

  • http://twitter.com/josephpollack Joseph Pollack

    download peer to peer then store on the cloud to stream from your mobile > pay to stream music and download onto your mobile.

  • http://twitter.com/chimaster chimaster

    “Music Beta in its current form is far from what we’d expect from a Google product” Ha, it's funny you said that. To me, all the Google products in the beginning (some of them still do) looked like something from a school's computer lab. Raw and crude.

  • http://twitter.com/upright Brent

    “Music Beta in its current form is far from what we’d expect from a Google product— it’s a web of confusing programs without a lot of instruction…”Uhm, what universe are you from? This is the case with most Google products.

  • http://twitter.com/upright Brent

    MOG is pretty cludgy and needs a lot of UI massaging, in my opinion. Wish them luck, they're going to need it.

  • http://twitter.com/upright Brent

    Sigh. Sad.

  • Michael Olsen

    It's beta. First day release. Beta. Limited release. Early adopters give feedback. Beta. And all your reactions don't even come close to a summation of 'miserable.' But it will sure get a lot of hits. Techmeme for sure. Sorry you couldn't download the app, how many times did you try. It was just updated today. It's impossible to do a real review of the BETA without the music app.Apple didn't want the Pre syncing with iTunes. This is far different than accessing the songs in an iTunes library. Several devices and apps already do this. See DoubleTwist and Amazon's cloud music. ACCs bought from Apple or DRM free and can play on several…..o nevermind. Why am I doing the reporting you are paid to do.

  • PotatoAbuser

    If anyone's looking for a Google Music Beta invite, I found a blog giving them out for free. I figured that the waiting list would be too long, so I tried the blog out, and got my invite about an hour later. Nice.I don't know if they have any remaining invites, but if you want to try your luck here's the site:http://freemusicbetainvites.co

  • http://herberthamaral.com/ Herberth Amaral

    I don't care… It doesn't work outside of USA :/

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GBCF5I3L36MOSBK6GOHQY4FLKM Sandy Hughes

    I was a Grooveshark fan until I found Audiogalaxy, and now I'm in love with it. I got a GOOG Music beta, but their quality sucks in comparison. I know it's beta n all, but I'll probably wait 2-3 months to try it. Until then, I have no complaints with Audiogalaxy. Didn't like MOG at all, FWIW.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KO5MQ6ZZIOEMU46AZHOUCJDRMM dan m

    Soooo…. they banned grooveshark, then released grooveshark?

  • irha

    Watch out, spam!

  • JessieBooFace

    HOLY SHIT! this site actually worked! and it's a lot better than expected >__> goodbye forever Pandora…

  • JessieBooFace

    repost

  • JessieBooFace

    repost

  • JohnDoey

    Apple not only has no problem with other applications and services accessing the user's iTunes library, they enable this to happen by storing the library in open formats. The issue with Palm was they were spoofing an iPod, pretending to actually be an iPod to use Apple's sync system instead of building their own.If there is any company that can make deals with labels, it is Apple, not Google.And a broken mess is exactly what we expect from a Google product. The vast majority of their products are lame copies of other people's products that come and go like the tide.

  • ZagYee

    lol, Think I will be sticking with the torrent sites for music! http://www.anon-web.es.tc

  • JohnDoey

    Google is over 75% Macs.

  • http://twitter.com/JustinSxE Justin (DJ EDGE)

    Waiting for Gizmodo to give a 100% biased opinion and saying how Apple can do better…

  • http://twitter.com/rennarda Andy Rennard

    This whole thing really smells like a solution in search of a problem. Do you really think 'normal' people will jump through all these hoops (and burn all that metered bandwidth limit) just to listen to music files they already have ?

  • http://www.affenstunde.com James Barnes

    Why does Google keep designing services as though bandwidth were free? Sure, in a perfect world it would be, but it's not – utilities such as water and electricity aren't free, why does everyone think that bandwidth will be?For most people it's still cheaper to download once and play on demand – and even cheaper to steal.Flawed model.

blog comments powered by Disqus