Corporate venture capital is roaring back

(Editor’s note: Robert R. Ackerman, Jr. is the founder and managing director of Allegis Capital. He submitted this story to VentureBeat.)

Two years ago, I wrote a column for VentureBeat that warned that America’s innovation engine was running out of gas because American corporations had been slashing long-term research and development for decades and, in more recent years, investments in venture-capital startups. To turn things around, I argued, corporations had to re-invest aggressively in venture capital and rely far more on leading-edge startups for outside R&D.Today it’s a different story. Corporations are seeing the light and reinvesting in venture capital. They have an incentive to stick with this strategy, and I’m optimistic that they will and materially strengthen the venture capital ecosystem and, for that matter, the U.S. economy.

Last year, corporations invested $1.9 billion in venture capital in America, up 33 percent from $1.35 billion in 2009.  That worked out to nearly 9 percent of all VC investing, approaching the historical high-water mark. Corporate venture capitalists also invested in 20 percent of all venture deals. The message is clear: Corporations are moving into the VC world in force.

Driving the trend is unusually strong balance sheets and a tectonic shift in where innovation now occurs – inside small companies. Corporations know they must tap into that.

Startups, of course, are all about innovation and are much more efficient innovators. If you give a dollar to a big corporation and a dollar to a small company for R&D and measure how it is spent in terms of cost and efficiency, the small company will win every time.

The list of companies jumping into venture capital keeps growing. It includes General Motors, Google, Juniper Networks, Kaplan Inc., Nvidia Corp. and Verizon Communications. The latest newcomers include The BMW Group, which this year launched a $100 million New York-based fund to invest in young companies to expand BMW’s expertise in sustainable and mobile technologies.

In addition, in February, EMC Corp. launched EMC Ventures. The EMC corporate development team invested for years in startups related to the company’s core IT infrastructure products. EMC Ventures has a bigger scope, however, and will invest in broader categories of companies. For example, it recently joined a venture syndicate to invest in Aria Systems, a cloud-based billing company.

A fair question, of course, is whether these corporations will stay the course in venture capital investing this time around. They have a history of jumping in and out of the field, often because they have a short-term, quarterly financial results focus, which contrasts with venture capital’s long-term, multi-year focus.

The length of this focus is a challenge, in particular, and not just because of the corporate focus on quarterly results. In a typical 10-year life span of a VC investment, you’re likely to see as many as three different teams of senior management at many corporations. They almost always have different priorities and goals. And, too often, the experience and relationships needed to do VC investing are never developed. Of if they are developed, they tend to get lost.

It is also true that there can be an impedance mismatch between a major corporation and a startup. Large corporations tend to be slow to move and cautious about new technologies. Startups are almost exactly the opposite. They are small, fast, efficient and untethered.

A partnership can create huge frustrations because the startup and the corporate partner operate at different speeds. To be successful, each company must acknowledge what it does well and what it does not.

Personally, I believe the growing partnership between corporate VC arms and startups will prove lasting. Corporations are still relatively cautious, which is good. They are investing far less in VC than they did in 1999-2000 (the last time they revved up significantly in this arena), and there are very few signs of irrational exuberance, at least outside of social media investing. More than ever, corporations need to develop a strong handle on all the rapid-fire innovation underway in small technology companies.

  • http://twitter.com/JayAClarke Jay Clarke

    It seems to be a beneficial relationship despite the frustrations that could arise. Both styles of business can derive benefits from either speeding up a little or taking a step back and slow down for a second. But it's good to see Corporate VC getting back into the funding business, especially if there is limited exuberance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=503604952 Dion Lisle

    As a good friend of mine says “when a mouse and an elephant meet, the first conversation is always awkward.” Well if corp / strategic investment teams can approach this with an open mind it is a great way forward. Just to clarify I would not call it Corporate VC as VC implies certain things like ability to invest regardless of a company's strategic direction and it has a fund. Many of these corporates invest on an ad-hoc basis out of operations monies, which is a very different animal and like the aforementioned elephant, much slower. VC's can invest with 2-3 partners agreeing, most corporates would require a committee to sign off.The difficult part is protecting this process from the internal politics of the large company and the skepticism of the start up. Large companies should admit this is “outsourcing” innovation and just be fine with that. The final hurdle is of course integrating the learnings from the startups into the BAU (Business as Usual) operations of a major company. Great article, thanks for sharing the progress of strategic invesments.

  • OpenViewScott

    Corporate investing in small private companies has been extremely cyclical for most corporate investors, so it will be interesting to see how long the programs last.  My sense is that corporate investing is EXTREMELY unstable, as – Many of the best investors get the experience at the corporates and then move to independent firms. – Most corporate investors do not actually get the support from the business units that they need for their value proposition- Corporate investing does not have great returns relative to investing into great VCs.- In the down side of the economic cycle, these longer term strategies seem to be the first to be cut- New senior management teams come in periodically, shine a bright light on the value of the program, and cut it.I am not sure why more corporations don't partner with the VC community more rather than investing directly.  It seems like they could get the strategic benefit of the radar into innovative young companies while also getting better investment returns and seeing more of the market.Scott MaxwellOpenView Venture Partners

  • http://twitter.com/BobAckerman Bob Ackerman

    Scott -You raise valid points about the sustainability of corporate venturing programs.  The protracted investment cycle of start-up companies is often at odds with the quarter to quarter reporting requirements of major corporations.  Further, management changes accompanied by strategy shifts often combine with a Not-Invented-Here culture to conspire against sustainable long term commitments to corporate venture capital programs.  Corporations that can point to sustainable track records in this area are rare – INTEL, Motorola, Comcast are on the short list of programs with fifteen years of history.At the same time, the trend line on investments in R & D by major corporations has a clear negative trend line.  According to research by the National Science Foundation, corporations with 25,000+ employees represented 70.7% of U.S. industrial R & D spending in 1981.  In that same year, companies with less than 5,000 employees represented 10.5% of the US figures.  Jumping forward to 2006, the same major corporations had dropped to 37.6% of the industrial R & D figure while the much smaller innovators were contributing 39.6% of the national total. The need for efficiency – both cost and time – is at the heart of this innovation transformation.With an increasingly competitive global economy and its accompanying margin pressures, an accelerated pace of innovation as well as the growing importance of “technology” to a broader spectrum of industries, the need for major corporations to overcome their internal challenges around innovation has come into sharp focus.  I think we can fairly make the point that those corporations who can develop and sustain viable corporate venture models – tapping into more efficient innovation –  will be at a competitive advantage in the innovation economy.  By its very nature, this challenge is about management and culture.  History is littered with former industrial leaders that failed to see their future through the lenses of innovation and/or were unable to respond.

blog comments powered by Disqus