Phillips Lighting CEO: Super-efficient light bulb prices will be cut in half by 2017

The cost of light bulbs that use light-emitting diodes (LED), which are much more efficient than typical incandescent light bulbs, could fall by as much as 50 percent by 2017, said Phillips Lighting chief executive Zia Eftekhar.

LED light bulbs haven’t taken off yet because the price tag per LED bulb can be as high as $50. But the latest generation of light bulbs can generate as much light as a 100-watt incandescent bulb using as little as 14 watts of power. Those LED bulb versions will be out sometime next year. That means consumers can save a lot of money over the life of the LED light — but they still have to pay a lot of money upfront, which can cut out casual buyers.

LED lighting is same technology that powers back-lighting for computer screens and televisions — not like the incandescent light bulbs in traditional light sources like lamps and light fixtures. The technology is expensive, but it is much more energy-efficient than traditional light bulbs. Each LED light bulb can last up to 25 times longer than a typical incandescent bulb.

Businesses also stand to save an enormous amount of money because they are more sensitive to the costs of lighting. There are a number of companies that are also working on a “smart” lighting grid that dynamically distributes lighting where it is needed using a combination of electricity usage monitoring and motion detection. Those companies are trying to make lighting behave like a broadband network of sorts — meaning they can be controlled from a central “router” that can monitor electricity usage and turn off lights that aren’t in use.

Phillips is also releasing a 17-watt LED bulb that can generate as much light as a 75-watt bulb. That bulb will again carry a pretty hefty price tag — between $40 and $45 — and will come out sometime in the fourth quarter this year. Like most other LED bulbs, it will last around 25 times longer than an incandescent light bulb, which means that consumers who pick up the LED light will probably earn back the cost of the bulb in electricity cost and light bulb purchase savings.

Bridgelux, another provider of LED light sources, earlier released an LED-powered light source that cost $20. That’s still quite a bit higher than traditional incandescent light bulbs, though, which cost anywhere from $2 to $10 per bulb. But it’s indicative of the kind of prices LED lighting can reach.
  • http://www.stuntedbyreality.com/ Joe Charakupa

    I don't get  it. Energy saving light bulbs use 20% of a traditional bulb's energy. i.e 11w = 60w incandescent. They can be had for as little as $0.40 although more commonly about $1.50. And they last 8 times as long. In my view that compares very well with what these LED bulbs are supposed to do. 20% energy saving for 25 times longer use at 40 times the cost.Why would anyone choose LED over the new energy saving bulbs? No one uses incandescent bulbs anymore. You guys really ought to be comparing their numbers to energy saving bulbs.

  • Robert Lockwood

    The bulbs could be more energy saving if they didn't have all the electronics in the base to convert mains AC power to the low voltage DC that the LEDs use.  Those electronics add to the cost, use energy, make the bulb more complicated, and add a new element subject to failure.  Building codes should be changed to at least provide low voltage DC to electrical fixtures that will be used for lighting.  Bulbs for those spots can less expensive, more efficient, and last longer.  An added benefit is saving the cost of the heavy wires that must go to the switches and fixtures with lighter wires (routing the power to the switches is not an optimal design).

  • Marhault

    agreed. LED bulbs will not be truly viable until they come within no more than $5 – $7 a bulb.

  • skilroy

    Are they being made in China. Every fluorescent  bulb I have purchased made in China has packed up inside two years or about 800 hours.

  • http://twitter.com/Ganslandt Ganslandt

    But then again we are talking abot lightsources that last for 30-40 year under normal household conditions. What's the fuzz?

blog comments powered by Disqus