It’s not pay-for-download. Not advertising. Not freemium. And not in-app purchases. Instead, for the rank-and-file of the hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of mobile developers around the world, e-commerce is now the most lucrative mobile monetization strategy.
Clearly, someone forgot to tell Clash of Clans.
That’s just one of the insights from what might be the largest-ever mobile developer survey, conducted by VisionMobile. Over 7,000 developers in 127 countries participated, including developers from Asia, Africa, Europe, and North America. And it might be a little hard to believe, given that massive freemium games with virtual goodies and powerups like Clash of Clans are pulling in just shy of a million dollars a day via in-app purchases.
But the survey was not about market leaders and app outliers. Rather, for the vast majority of app developers who do not have massive viral hits, e-commerce is a surprising winner, even though only eight percent of app developers currently use it.
“The median revenues of organizations involved in e-commerce are $2,750 per app/month, by far the highest among all app revenue models that we track,” VisionMobile says in the survey.
That contrasts sharply with the median revenue per app on iOS in general, at between $500 and $1,000 per app per month, and catastrophically with the median revenue per app on Google Play, which is just $100-200 per app per month. Both of those median revenues, of course, are generated largely by advertising revenues, in-app purchases, and other monetization methodologies.
“In-app advertising remains one of most popular revenue models at 26% of app developers, particularly strong on platforms where demand for direct purchases is weak, such as Windows Phone and Android,” VisionMobile says.
Popular, I suppose, but hardly lucrative.
A key driver of the shift? According to VisionMobile, it’s Amazon. Amazon introduced its Mobile Associates API recently, which allows developers to feature Amazon products — and earn up to six percent of their purchase price when users buy them. The amount of money developers can make here is vastly higher, per user, than traditional advertising … which is why in just two quarters the number of developers using this strategy jumped from five percent to eight percent.
In other news from the survey, more developers target Android than any other platform, which is not a shock. But most developers still build first for Apple’s IOS platform, in spite of that fact that Android has something like 80 percent global market share. While 71 percent of developers build for Android, 59 percent of developer prioritize iOS — which is precisely why the best apps generally come to Apple’s platform first.
Driving that priority is that, just like the rest of us, mobile developers like to take home a paycheck.
With Android developers making just $100-200 per app per month and Windows Phone developer making even less — $1 to $50 per app per month — it’s not easy out there. In fact, in a global app economy worth $68 billion last year, most developers are making less than $500 per app, per month.
That puts 60 percent of developers below the “app poverty line,” according to VisionMobile.
Interestingly, iOS has a bigger middle class, with more developers in higher income tiers than Android, Windows Phone, or BlackBerry. While something like 60 percent of Android developers are below the poverty line and 89 percent of Windows Phone developers are joining them in the food stamps line, more than 50 percent of iOS developers are above the app poverty line, making more than $500 per app per month.
Perhaps 10 percent of iOS developers are in the middle income tier, with $10,000 to $50,000 in monthly income per app, and another five or so percent are in the top income level, with over $50,000 in monthly income per app.
One impressive note about Android, however: if you want an absolute top-tier income, Android has the highest percentage of developers with greater than $50,000 in income, per app, per month.
The entire report is available, for free, at Developer Economics.