stories by Edward Varnell
As a new PS3 owner, I decided to check out the game inFamous. Seeing that a lot a of gamers view this game as a excellent title, I was intrigue to pick it up (and the fact I brought the
I hear a lot of people mention how Microsoft started out right with the introduction of Achievements and leaderboards and how awesome it was to get points for completing a quest or doing something cool within a game. Soon, Sony followed and introduced trophies. Now that Nintendo is preparing to enter the HD era of gaming, a lot of gamers wonder what is taking them so long to get on the accomplishment band wagon. For this entry in the Bitmob Writing Challenge, I want to explain the reasons behind Nintendo’s reluctance to use achievements on their systems, and if are they justified.
In the first blog, I dealt with M rated games being sold through parents to younger children. I brought the question up on how this should be handle so that cliché problems from certain groups don’t rant and wave about it and using unproven scientific facts to help with their argument.
I can honestly say that games will never worry me. Even with backlash or agreements on various games and their styles and game play, I continue to be amazed and wrapped in them. They are not my whole world though and I can easily distance myself when I know I had enough. My reason for saying this: I think video games may become obsolete.
I wonder what would happen if Joust and Ghost’n’Goblins became a crossover game? Arthur on the Joust Ostrich with him throwing his lance on a 2D land shoot em up. Develop by Treasure. Okay, that is way far fetch (and would be difficult to play if Treasure makes it super hard). With Professor Layton/Phoenix Wright, Street Fighter x Tekken and vice versa and all other kind of cross over games, I think the most unknown and unexpected games to come together and make something mind blowing would be what we need.
Let me see what happens with this one. What I mean is that we can argue about used games and never get a solution beside games going digital and that’s it. I for one, want to see if people feel that used games can help a gamer’s library expand or that it is the only way to get certain games when they go out of print.
I recently picked up the latest Electronic Gaming Monthly issue and on the cover, it had a title for their cover story saying “Battlefield 3 vs. Call Of Duty: MW3”. I was interest to see what the story is about and basically it boiled down to which one will be the most successful out of the two. The magazine does a great job pointing out their strengths and weaknesses for each game. Written very well and insightful, it made me think of something else. What right do I have to be disinterested in both of them? I’m not really into war or FPS as a personal option to add to my collection of games. In fact, has any of us thought of any reason to be disinterested in games that are successful and are guarantee sells for that publisher?
As a gamer since 1985, I never consider score points to be the main point of a game. Some may see high scores of proven skill or how they have some kind of supernatural power to rank up combos with ease. Some have become legendary for pulling off this feat over time with arcade classics like Pac Man, Galaga, Robotron, and Donkey Kong. It was a moment in time to those who gain fame and recognition for it. Yet, now a days, only a certain amount of people are setting records with score and some games now a says don’t have it. Has the power of the score change or has it turned into something else?
Capcom? Let’s talk. I really want to know why Gill was created in the first place for Street Fighter 3? No, do not give me that answer of hardcore SF Fans needed a challenge. You, my friend, have slept with difficulty far to long and this is a betrayal to me. I love you for the game but I cannot mess with Gill. He should have never come into existence. Until you learn what balance is, you and your game will be unplayable (or at least until someone give me a challenge at a arcade only cabinet).
We are not mature. Let me be more correct with this. We are not ready for a new experience in thematic games that may cross the line. For console players, we want things that work. We long for fun sequels or original stories with new or used concepts. We prefer better music over level design and great voice acting and a working camera than the characters themselves. This might seem odd to you but think about it: What would you be willing to play more? A game that has a Military/Space marine plot or something that deals with abortion?