VentureBeat

Posts Tagged ‘co:Enteromedics’

(UPDATED: See below.)

(NOTE: This item was originally published as part of today’s life-sciences briefing.)

enteromedics-logo.jpgEnteroMedics, a St. Paul, Minn., device maker working on a neuromodulation implant for treating obesity, slashed its expected IPO pricing by half, lowering it to a range of $8 to $9 instead of its earlier estimate of $14 to $16. The company’s latest SEC fliing is here; under the new terms, EnteroMedics can raise at most $51.8 million, down from the $92 million it had previously planned on.

Needless to say, this sort of thing is never a good sign, particularly for a company whose potentially transformative technology still lacks convincing evidence that it really works. The EnteroMedics device, which it calls Maestro, is still in late-stage clinical trials in Australia, Mexico, Norway and Switzerland, but isn’t terribly far along yet. The company says it has so far implanted the Maestro device in 76 patients, of which it has followed 11 for a full year. Its “pivotal” late stage trial, however, only began in the third quarter and will involve 220 patients, all of whom will have the device implanted, although only 145 or so will have it turned on. In fact, EnteroMedics wants to expand the trial to 300 patients.

maestro-vbloc-system.JPGWhen EnteroMedics initially filed for its IPO, it wasn’t very clear about exactly how the VBLOC “neuroblocking” technology in the Maestro is supposed to work. In subsequent months it has launched a Web site and added diagrams (see, for instance, the thumbnail image at left; click it for a larger version) and other information to its filings in order to explain the technique in more detail.

EnteroMedics now describes Maestro as a device that uses short electrical pulses to interfere with signals along the vagus nerve, in turn — and in theory — limiting stomach expansion, reducing the intensity and frequence of stomach contractions and inducing feelings of fullness. The device involves an implanted, radio-controlled “neuroregulator” whose electrodes extend to the vagus nerve near the junction of the stomach and the esophagus. A separate external unit controls the pulse frequency and wirelessly recharges the neuroregulator.

Given the severity of the obesity “epidemic” and the desperation of many overweight people, you’d think investors would be falling all over themselves to invest in a technology like VBLOC, which — again, in theory — offers the advantages of gastric-bypass surgery with a much less invasive procedure. The obvious drawback, of course, is the possibility that the device doesn’t work or, worse, that it might actually harm patients. EnteroMedics says it has observed seven adverse events to date, but adds that all were resolved without surgery or permanent effects.

Of course, it doesn’t help that the experimental evidence that this sort of technique should work is in relatively short supply. EnteroMedics itself notes that severing the vagus nerve, or vagotomy, used to be a common treatment for ulcers, after which many patients temporarily absorbed fewer calories from fat, lost weight and had decreased appetite. VBLOC attempts to mimic these effects of vagotomy without blocking all signals, yet EnteroMedics cites no studies to suggest that the technique works, and doesn’t appear to have published any of its research to date in patient studies.

EnteroMedics, of course, isn’t the only startup to see investors turn up their noses during a roadshow. About a month ago, the adult stem-cell company Bioheart also halved its IPO terms, and hasn’t yet managed to get its offering off the ground. (See our recent coverage here and here.) Like EnteroMedics, Bioheart is pushing ahead with a risky, largely unproven technology that’s only tenuously grounded in hard scientific findings. Perhaps it’s no wonder that investors are starting to get cold feet in both cases now that they’re finally getting a better look at these companies’ underpinnings. Or maybe it’s just one more sign — as if we needed it — that risk of any sort, particularly given the subprime-mortgage meltdown, is increasingly out of favor.

UPDATE: EnteroMedics went public later in the day at a price of $8 a share, limiting the company’s maximum IPO take to $46 million. That’s better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, but generally speaking, still not so hot.

Featured companies: Advanced Bio-Surfaces, Ambit Biosciences, EnteroMedics, Molecular Vision, Skyline Ventures

UPDATED: Expanded items on Skyline Ventures, Ambit, and Molecular Vision, and moved EnteroMedics to a new item here.

skyline-ventures-logo.jpgSkyline Ventures raises $350M life-sciences fund — Skyline Ventures, a Palo Alto, Calif., VC firm, closed a $350 million fund for healthcare and life-sciences investments. The fund is Skyline’s fifth.

Skyline is unquestionably coming off a hot streak. As it notes in its release, three of its portfolio companies were acquired this year — Avidia, by Amgen; NimbleGen, by Roche; and NovaCardia, by Merck (the links point to our coverage). Four of its portfolio companies — Hansen Medical, Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Map Pharmaceuticals and Targanta Pharmaceuticals — went public, of which two were big hits: Hansen is up 142 percent and Sirtris 70 percent. (Map is up 13 percent and Targanta is still down 7.5 percent.)

Skyline said it will continue to invest in a mix of early, mid- and later stage companies. The firm is targeting about 15 investments of about $15 million to $35 million per startup.

ambit-biosciences-logo.gifCancer-drug maker Ambit Biosciences draws $49M — San Diego’s Ambit Biosciences, a biotech focused on new cancer drugs, raised $49.3 million in a fourth funding round. The company’s drugs block a class of signaling proteins called kinases, a technique that has yielded at least one major cancer drug — Gleevec, used to treat a form of leukemia.

Ambit’s leading drug candidate, a drug for a different form of leukemia, just got off the ground in April, so it will still be some time before anyone knows if its “discovery engine” for kinase inhibitors is yielding good drugs. That hasn’t deterred a number of biotech/pharma VC arms from investing in the latest round, including MedImmune Ventures, Roche Venture Fund and NovaQuest (an arm of Quintiles). Other investors include Apposite Capital, OrbiMed Advisors, Radius Ventures, Horizon Technology Finance, Perseus-Soros Biopharmaceutical Fund, Forward Ventures, Avalon Ventures, GIMV, Jov-CMDF, and Genechem.

enteromedics-logo.jpgEnteroMedics, obesity-device maker, almost halves IPO price target — This item has been expanded and moved here.

molecular-vision-logo.jpgU.K.’s Molecular Vision acquired by Acrongenomics — Molecular Vision, a London developer of credit-card sized diagnostic devices, was acquired by Acrongenomics of Geneva for an undisclosed sum. Acrongenomics appears to be a grab-bag company that acquires promising life-science technologies and then brings them to market. The release is here.

Acrongenomics previously held a joint development agreement with Molecular Vision. Our previous coverage of Molecular Vision is here.

OTHER HEADLINES OF NOTE:

Featured companies: Allozyne, Arteriocyte Medical Systems, Arthrosurface, Bay City Capital, EnteroMedics, OncoVista, Novotech, Power Medical Interventions, Reliant Technologies

UPDATED: Expanded items on Allozyne, Reliant Tech, Power Medical and Bay City Capital.
UPDATE REDUX: Added item on EnteroMedics IPO.

allozyne-logo-1.jpgSeattle’s Allozyne draws $30M for new interferon — Allozyne, a Seattle biotech focused on tweaking existing protein-based drugs to improve their properties, raised $30 million in a second round of financing. Investors included MPM Capital, OVP Venture Partners, Amgen Ventures, ARCH Venture Partners and Alexandria Real Estate Equities.

Allozyne’s twist on improving protein-based drugs — i.e., most biotech drugs — is to substitute “non-natural” amino acids into the proteins themselves. (Recall that a protein is essentially just a long chain of amino acids.) By swapping out natural amino acids with synthetic versions at key points in the protein, Allozyne hopes to improve the effectiveness and safety of protein drugs. The company’s description of it’s approach is here.

The company’s first drug candidate is a modified version of interferon beta, which is currently used to treat multiple sclerosis. The funding will support the first early-stage human trials of the drug, and will also “accelerate” development of a second candidate.

In addition, Allozyne will prepare to exit Accelerator, a Seattle biotech incubator connected with the Institute for Systems Biology. We previously wrote about Accelerator here.

reliant-tech-logo.jpgMed-device maker Reliant Tech sets IPO terms, aims for $86M take — Not to be confused with Reliant Pharmaceuticals, which set its IPO terms yesterday, Mountain View, Calif.-based Reliant Technologies set its price range today and now hopes to raise up to $86.5 million in an offering of as many as 5.4 million shares. Reliant hopes to price those shares between $14 and $16 apiece.

Reliant makes medical lasers for “skin rejuvenation” treatments. Our previous coverage of the company is here.

power-medical-logo.jpgPower Medical IPO falls short, raises up to $49M for robotic-surgery systems — Power Medical Interventions, a Langhorne, Pa., maker of computer- and power-assisted surgery tools, fell short of its IPO hopes and now stands to raise no more than $49 million from its offering. Its latest SEC filing is here.

The company priced its shares at $11 apiece, well under the $12 to $14 range it previously established. (Our coverage is here.) Power Medical could sell as many as 4.4 million shares in the offering.

The result is a sharp disappointment for Power Medical, which had originally hoped to raise as much as $100 million in its offering. The company’s lackluster start contrasts with the soaring welcome spinal-implant maker TranS1 received earlier this month (our coverage here). If it’s any consolation, though, Power Medical shares staged an early recovery, rising 60 cents, or 5.5 percent, to $11.60 in early trading today.

bay-city-capital-logo.jpgBay City Capital closes $500M life-science fund — The San Francisco-based VC firm Bay City Capital, which focuses on life-science investments, closed a $500 million fifth fund, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The fund is significantly larger than its predecessor, which closed at $350 million in 2004.

Bay City intends to back 15 to 20 biotech, medical-device and diagnostics companies with the fund, which suggests it will tend to favor later-stage deals — now a long-standing VC trend. The firm told VentureWire that it will invest at all stages, including “seed-stage bets on start-ups launched in-house and structured investments in publicly traded companies.”

enteromedics-logo.jpgEnteroMedics sets IPO terms, looks for $92M to support obesity-control implants — St. Paul, Minn.-based EnteroMedics, a device company developing a neuromodulation implant designed to regulate appetite, set its IPO terms and now aims to offer up to 5.75 million shares at a price of $14 to $16 apiece. The offering could value the company at as much as $261 million while raising up to $92 million.

EnteroMedics is one of several companies angling to introduce new obesity treatments that don’t rely on drugs or invasive surgery. Although its technology is still being tested to assess its effectiveness, EnteroMedics has launched a spiffy new Web site with lots of pictures and animations to illustrate how it believes its implant will work. For our previous coverage of the company, see here and here.

OTHER HEADLINES OF NOTE:

EnteroMedics, a St. Paul, Minn., developer of obesity-treatment implants, filed to raise up to $86.25 million in an IPO. Its S-1 filing with the SEC is here.

The company is developing a neuromodulation implant called VBLOC that is designed to intermittently disrupt signals sent along the vagus nerve, which regulates many functions of the stomach, intestines and pancreas. Ideally, the implanted device will limit stomach expansion, reduce the frequency and strength of stomach contractions, and induce a sense of fullness in patients. The company envisions the device as a safer and less invasive obesity treatment than drug therapy or interventions such as bariatric, or stomach-reduction, surgery.

EnteroMedics plans to test VBLOC in a large 220-patient trial starting in the third quarter. This trial will actually be placebo controlled, which in this case means that roughly one-third of the patients will have the device implanted, but never turned on. That sort of trial design should produce more reliable data than most device trials, which often don’t employ placebo comparisons. If all goes well, the company believes it may bring VBLOC to the market in 2010.

The company has so far raised approximately $64 million in venture funding, according to VentureWire (subscription required). Major shareholders include MPM Capital, Bay City Capital, Aberdare Ventures, InterWest Partners and Onset Ventures.

Top Stories

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Guest Columnists

Job Board

Links

Venturebeat Writers

  • For advertising, contact .
  • Log in

Font Size