VentureBeat

Posts Tagged ‘co:Oracle-Healthcare-Acquisition’

(UPDATED: See below.)

Another one bites the dust.

precision-tx-logo.jpgThe saga of Precision Therapeutics, a Pittsburgh biotech developing what struck me last August as a particularly crude type of cancer-chemotherapy diagnostic, continues apace. In a tersely worded press release, the special-purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, Oracle Healthcare Acquisition said it has terminated its planned merger with Precision. The release blamed “currently prevailing market conditions” for the decision, which carries some fairly ominous consequences for both sides.

Oracle’s plight is fairly simple: The blank-check company will now dissolve itself and return the money it raised, minus expenses, to investors. For Precision, however, the outlook is much starker. The merger would not only have taken the company public, it would have left Precision with $120 million in cash, ample resources to bolster sales of its ChemoFx test and to develop new potential products.

Now, after getting jilted at the altar by Oracle and withdrawing its IPO, the startup is most likely almost out of cash. As of September 30, Precision had only $15.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and a working-capital deficit of $1.1 million against debts of $17 million — plus a burn rate of roughly $3 million a quarter. Those numbers don’t look good by any measure

The first real sign the merger was in trouble came just about two weeks ago, when Oracle and Precision effectively cut the overall size of the deal by 15 percent — never a good sign. Oracle’s decision to walk away remains murky to me given the complexity of the deal, and external market events might have somehow triggered provisions that made the acquisition untenable. But I can’t help wondering if the buyers may have simply concluded that Precision’s prospects weren’t at all what they once thought.

For more on these special-purpose acquisition outfits and their adventures in life science, see our coverage here.

UPDATE: Tom Salemi at the In Vivo blog has more:

A majority of the investors who buy into the SPAC through an initial public offering must approve of the merger. In deciding how to vote, investors must weigh whether or not they’d be better off cashing out now rather than letting their bets ride on a company like Precision Therapeutics.

In fact, according to Oracle’s annual filing, any shareholder that voted against the merger stood to receive roughly $8 for each of their shares if they were outvoted and the deal went through. To us, the question would appear to be simple. Were investors better off taking the $8 for their share or rolling the dice with shares in the new Precision Therapeutics shares?

Given the recent performance of IPOs, IN VIVO Blog is guessing the $8 was looking pretty good to Oracle investors.

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

(NOTE: Sorry for the minimal posting yesterday — I was at the Health 2.0 conference with extremely limited Internet connectivity. Normal posting resumes today.)

Precision Thera merger with “blank check” Oracle Healthcare collapses – This item is now a standalone post here.

sleep-solutions-logo-150px.gifSleep Solutions takes in $21M for sleep-apnea diagnostics – Sleep Solutions, a Pasadena, Md., developer of diagnostic devices for sleep apnea, raised $20.5 million in a new funding round. Investors included TPG Biotechnology, MedVenture Associates, Emergent Ventures and Lava Ventures.

Sleep Solutions has developed a home-use diagnostic device for identifying sleep apnea, which are breathing difficulties during sleep. Diagnosing apnea has traditionally required patients to spend the night in a sleep laboratory. Left untreated, apnea can increase the risk of more serious problems, including stroke and heart attack.

Trevena takes in $24M for drugs targeting G-proteins – Trevena (no Web site), a Berwyn, Penn., biotech focused on a new area of drug discovery, raised $24 million in a first funding round. Investors included Alta Partners, Healthcare Ventures, New Enterprise Associates and Polaris Venture Partners.

Like many biotechs, Trevena plans to develop drugs that attack a particular biological mechanism rather than any particular disease. In this case, the company is targeting a class of proteins known as G-protein coupled receptors, or GPCR, which according to the company are affected by close to 40 percent of all drugs on the market today. The company didn’t describe its plans in any detail.

edf-ventures-logo-150px.gifHealthcare investor EDF Ventures postpones fourth fund – EDF Ventures, an Ann Arbor, Mich., VC firm specializing in early-stage healthcare, has delayed a planned fourth fund, VentureWire reports. The postponement is related to the departure last year of managing director Beau Lasky, who left for Steamboat Ventures.

The firm intends to begin talking to potential investors again in several months. EDF didn’t say how much it hopes to raise in the new fund; its third fund closed in 2005 with $55 million in commitments.

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

Another slow news day, as yesterday we covered most of the fundings other sites are writing about today. I’ll update if anything else crops up. In the meantime, feel free to check out yesterday’s briefing or any other items here.

HemCon Medical acquires Alltracel Pharma – This item is now a standalone post here.

Transoma Medical, implantable wireless device maker, withdraws its IPO – Transoma Medical, a St. Paul, Minn., maker of implantable wireless diagnostic sensors, formally withdrew its $77.6 million IPO. Transoma postponed its IPO earlier this month; unsurprisingly, the company cited “unfavorable market conditions” as the reason for its withdrawal.

Transoma is one of several startups working on ways to monitor the vital signs of sick or at-risk patients in ways that don’t require invasive procedures or constant visits to the doctor’s office. The company’s devices, which received FDA approval last October, involve an implantable recorder that monitors a patient’s heartbeat and a handheld wireless device that records the data and regularly transmits it to a physician’s office via a home-installed base station.

The company has raised just over $25 million in three funding rounds since its founding in 1984, when it was known as Data Sciences International. Although Transoma generates close to $40 million a year from sales of its older diagnostic products, it is still burning cash at a rate of roughly $4.3 million every quarter. As of Sept. 30, 2007, Transoma held $26.1 million in cash, equivalents, and working capital, so its cash situation isn’t yet dire; if those trends hold, it will be down to about $17 million by the end of March. Don’t be surprised if Transoma hits the fundraising hustings again before long.

changehealthcare-logo-150px.gifMedBillManager adopts new name as parent company change:healthcare aims for March 3 relaunch – MedBillManager, a site that helps people sort through complex medical expenses, will adopt a new name and Web site as it relaunches on March 3. Its parent company, Nashville, Tenn.-based change:healthcare, is consolidating its various Health 2.0 properties under its own name; these will now be available at www.changehealthcare.com.

The company announced the changes in an email; for a Web version, see here. A screenshot of the new site suggests that change:healthcare will now be emphasizing social networking as part of services for medical-bill management, finding and rating doctors, and comparing prices across various healthcare providers.

precision-tx-logo-150px.gifOracle Healthcare cuts Precision Thera acquisition price by roughly 15 percent – Back in December, the “blank check” acquisition company Oracle Healthcare Acquisition agreed to buy the Pittsburgh diagnostic biotech Precision Therapeutics in a transaction that was virtually impossible to value at the time. Only later did the companies indicate that the acquisition would cost Oracle around $150 million (based on the issuance of 19 million Oracle shares at a price of $7.90 apiece detailed in this prospectus).

Not any more, apparently. The two companies just agreed to reduce a key variable in the calculation that establishes how many shares Oracle will issue to Precision’s owners, cutting the deal’s value by approximately 15 percent to roughly $127.5 million. The details, however, remain a bit murky: The deal’s participants haven’t done anyone a favor by describing the ratio at which Precision shares will convert to Oracle shares in a dense, wordy paragraph. Complex calculations like this should be set out in an equation with clearly defined variables, dammit.

In addition, the proposed amendment to the merger deal will cause founders of Oracle to forfeit shares of the special-purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, currently worth $14.8 million. It will also eliminate a “top-up” provision that would have handed Precision shareholders extra Oracle stock if the SPAC’s share price declined.

What does all this add up to? It sure looks like everyone involved in the deal is getting a haircut of some kind, although why this is happening now isn’t remotely clear. I’m certainly tempted to think that Precision is turning out less of a bargain Oracle thought, but at this point, it’s impossible to know for sure.

For more about SPACs, see our coverage here.

UPDATE: The merger is dead.

(UPDATE: The merger is dead.)

precision-tx-logo.jpgPittsburgh’s Precision Therapeutics, a biotech working on diagnostics designed to identify the best chemotherapy for cancer patients, appears to have dropped its planned IPO and instead went public via a reverse merger with Oracle Healthcare Acquisition — a “blank check” acquisition firm that appears to be no relation of the database-software giant.

I was pretty hard on Precision when it filed its IPO, since its cancer diagnostic test not only struck me as fairly crude and simplistic, it also lacks compelling data suggesting that it should do much good. IPO investors apparently weren’t overly enthusiastic either, although for some reason the Oracle acquisition folks seem to have jumped at the opportunity.

Financial terms of the deal aren’t entirely clear, but the release notes that the combined company — which will retain the Precision name — will have $120 million in cash. That amounts to a substantial cash infusion, given that Precision reported only about $19 million on hand in cash and working capital as of June 30. So either the Oracle guys are idiots, which seems unlikely, or they’re seeing something here that didn’t jump out the last time I went through the S-1. Or perhaps they’re just willing to bet the farm on the possibility — slim though it may seem — that Precision’s diagnostic tests will somehow emerge as blockbusters. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time in this industry.

Top Stories

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Featured Guest Columnists

Job Board

Links

Venturebeat Writers

  • For advertising, contact .
  • Log in

Font Size