VentureBeat

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

• Antibody-discovery startup Adimab raises new funding (release)
• Lung-device maker Spiration gets $19M (release)
• Sample-prep startup Protein Discovery pulls in $10M (release)
• Inogen takes in $13M for portable oxygen device (VentureWire)
• Healthcare IT concern Medaptus raises $11M for expansion (VentureWire)
• Contract lab Synexis raises $14M (peHUB)
• Medical-device VC firm BioStar Ventures takes in $24M of $80M fund (peHUB)
• Halsa Pharma gets $250K for “natural” obesity-control treatment (release)
• Diagnostics provider Lab21 acquires NPTech (peHUB)
• Galil Medical names Martin Emerson CEO (release)

Antibody-discovery startup Adimab raises new funding – Lebanon, N.H.-based Adimab, a biotech working on new ways to discover antibody drugs, has raised a second round of funding. The company didn’t disclose the size of the round.

Adimab, which raised $6 million last July, is one of several startups looking to design new antibody drugs in bioengineered yeast cells, as we wrote at the time. (Alder Biopharmaceuticals, which raised $40 million in January, is another.) The technique promises to be much faster — and freer of patent restrictions — than current methods. When Adimab completes its current manufacturing facility in the second quarter, it claims it will be able to produce a panel of human antibodies against a particular target in just 90 days, instead of the year or more traditional methods can require.

Investors included Polaris Venture Partners and SV Life Sciences, who also invested in the company’s first round.

Lung-device maker Spiration gets $19M – Spiration, a Redmond, Wash., medical-device startup, raised $18.5 million in a seventh funding round. Investors included Versant Ventures, Olympus Medical Systems, New Enterprise Associates, New Leaf Venture Partners, InterWest Partners, Investor Growth Capital and Three Arch Partners.

Spiration has now raised a total of $97 million. It is developing a set of one-way valves for emphysema that can be implanted in the lung’s airways via a minimally invasive procedure. These valves are designed to shunt air away from diseased portions of the lung and redirect it to healthier areas. The company said the funding would support commercialization of its device in Europe and to complete studies for regulatory approval in the U.S.

Other startups working on similar technology include Emphasys Medical, Pulmonx and Broncus Technologies.

Sample-prep startup Protein Discovery pulls in $10M – Knoxville, Tenn.-based Protein Discovery, a biotech with new laboratory technology for protein identification, raised $10 million in a third funding round. Investors included Santé Ventures, Memphis Biomed Ventures, the Southern Appalachian Fund, and the Nashville Capital Network.

The startup is developing technology that aims to “simplify” the process of preparing biological samples for protein analysis. The details are probably too much for anyone who’s not a lab technician themselves, but feel free to check out the company’s explanation if you dare.)

Inogen takes in $13M for portable oxygen device – Inogen, a Goleta, Calif., medical-device maker, raised $12.6 million in its fifth funding round, VentureWire reports. Investors included Accuitive Medical Ventures, Arboretum Ventures, Avalon Ventures, Novo A/S, Numenor Ventures and Versant Ventures.

The company makes and sells portable oxygen-delivery systems for patients suffering from a lung problem called chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The product has been on the market for several years, and Inogen says it believes it might take several more before it’s in a position to be acquired or to go public.

(UPDATED: See below.)

A common dilemma in biotech acquisitions is how to keep a startup’s entrepreneurial management happy and productive when they’ve just been assimilated by the Borg. The answer, often enough, is not to bother, and to let them spin out a new company with scientific “leftovers” that weren’t the point of the acquisition in the first place.

That’s more or less what Amgen has just done in launching Relypsa, a new Santa Clara, Calif., biotech just spun out of the big biotech’s Ilypsa unit. Relypsa is basically a full restart of Ilypsa — thus the name, I suppose — which Amgen acquired earlier this year for roughly $420 million (see our coverage here).

Of course, the new startup now lacks the kidney-disease drug (specifically, a treatment for hyperphosphatemia) that Amgen had shown particular interest in. But Relypsa is free to rev up its existing drug-discovery platform — one focused on making drugs out of long-lasting polymers that grab and eliminate excess molecules such as potassium or sodium — and also managed to keep a pipeline of promising candidates that might one day be useful in treating kidney and heart disease.

Such restarts of acquired biotechs aren’t unknown in the industry, although they’ve been growing in popularity. For instance, the former management of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals recently banded together to form Ophthotech with technology left over from Eyetech after it was swallowed by OSI Pharmaceuticals (our coverage here). This sort of strategy is likely to hold increasing relevance for Big Pharma as its companies fire up their biotech-acquisition machines.

The Relypsa deal, however, may set records for speed and continuity. The former CEO of Ilypsa, Jay Shepard, reprises that role at Relypsa; Ilypsa co-founder Garrett Klaerner returns as COO; and Ilypsa’s former chief medical officer Detlef Albrecht now resumes that position at Relypsa. (Honestly, props to whoever came up with the name “Relypsa,” because it’s really apropos here.) And so on down the line.

Relypsa raised $33 million in a first spinout round, with investors that included 5AM Ventures, New Leaf Venture Partners, the Sprout Group, Delphi Ventures, CMEA Ventures and Mediphase Venture Partners. Amgen, of course, retains a minority stake in Relypsa, and probably insisted on some form of right-of-first-refusal should Relypsa get interested in striking a partnership with — or selling itself to — another company. (I’ve asked Relypsa’s representatives about that, and will report back if I learn more.)

UPDATE: Relypsa’s external PR person got back to me on the right-of-first-refusal question, but kudos to you if you can make any sense of it. Here’s the response in its entirety: “Amgen retained certain rights related to transferred programs customary for spin outs at this stage. Relypsa will initiate partnering campaigns for certain indications and territories as appropriate.” Well, that was helpful. Sometimes I wonder why I bother asking.

UPDATE REDUX: In a later interview, Relypsa COO Gerrit Klaerner told me that “of course” Relypsa has an “entanglement” with Amgen, although he wouldn’t go much further than the official statement in describing Amgen’s particular rights. “There is enough skin in the game for Amgen to keep an interest in Relypsa,” he said. “If you see us doing a partnership, you will get an answer to your question.”

Klaerner added that the idea of recreating Ilypsa came up shortly after the acquisition. “We wanted to save a bunch of jobs and create a new home for the technology,” said Klaerner, who worked as an advisor to 5AM for the deal. “We had 38 people who, after the success of Ilypsa, had multiple job offers and asked them to stick with us, even though the company wasn’t really created.” What’s more, he said, Amgen’s backing of the deal didn’t waver despite the company’s recent woes (see, for instance, here). “Given what they were going through, to give this level of high-level support was really, really remarkable,” Klaerner said.

Oh, and the name Relypsa was apparently an internal placeholder that turned into the real thing when no one could think of anything better, Klaerner said.

FINAL UPDATE: I started thinking about other recent deals that resemble Ilypsa-Relypsa after an email correspondent planted the bug in my ear. The one that comes most immediately to mind would be the launch of Sequel Pharmaceuticals — another clever name — out of NovaCardia’s acquisition by Merck (our coverage here). Another example would be Cerexa Pharmaceuticals, which spun out of Peninsula Pharmaceuticals in 2005 after Peninsula was purchased by J&J. Cerexa was acquired by Forest Labs this past January, and doesn’t appear to have launched another spinout.

Have any other good examples? Sound off in comments.

Featured companies: DirectFlow, Direvo, Indigo Biosystems, MacroGenics

Direct Flow raises $27M for heart-valve implants — Santa Rosa, Calif.-based Direct Flow Medical, a startup developing heart implants, raised $27 million in a second funding round. Investors included Johnson & Johnson Development, Foundation Medical Partners, VantagePoint Venture Partners, ePlanet, EDF Ventures, New Leaf Venture Partners and Spray Venture Partners.

Direct Flow makes minimally invasive aortic-valve replacements for the heart. This particular field happens to be booming — we’ve previously covered competitors JenaValve, AorTx and Sadra.

MacroGenics signs Eli Lilly pact worth initial $43M for autoimmune disease — MacroGenics, a Rockville, Md., biotech developing antibody-based therapies for autoimmune disease, signed a partnership with Eli Lilly that could be worth more than $600 million. MacroGenics is working on antibodies designed to tamp down autoimmune responses by inducing tolerance to antigens that might otherwise promote strong immune reactions to the body’s own cells. The company’s first drug candidate targets diabetes — specifically “type one” diabetes that results when the immune system targets insulin-producing cells in the pancreas.

OTHER HEADLINES OF NOTE:

• Indigo Biosystems gets funding for lab-data software (VentureWire, sub req’d)
• Germany’s Direvo pulls in €12M for biomanufacturing (release)

Featured companies: Ablynx, Bind Biosciences, Maas Biolab, Oriel Therapeutics, ThromboVision, Xcellerex

(UPDATED: See below.)

Contract biomanufacturer Xcellerex pulls in $31M — Marlborough, Mass.-based Xcellerex, a startup that provides contract “bioprocess” development and manufacturing, raised $31 million in a third funding round. Investors included VantagePoint Venture Partners, Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, and SCG Investments.

Xcellerex develops modular “turnkey” manufacturing systems for complex biomolecules such as the proteins, peptides, antibodies and nucleic acids used in biotech drugs and vaccines. The company doesn’t, however, appear to name any of the corporate partners for which it is presumably providing these services.

Maas Biolab receives $2.1M grant for potential Lou Gehrig’s treatment — Maas Biolab, an Albuquerque, N.M., company focused on turning the older immunosuppressive drug cyclosporine into a treatment for Lou Gehrig’s disease, received a $2.1 million grant to further its work. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke provided the funding.

Maas believes that cyclosporine is a neuroprotective drug and says that it extends the lives of mice with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the technical name for Lou Gehrig’s disease. The company’s experimental drug Mitogard is a proprietary form of cyclosporine specifically intended for adminstration into cerebrospinal fluid. It’s not clear from the Maas Web site if it developed Mitogard or licensed it from elsewhere. The drug is not yet in clinical trials; Maas says the drug will undergo “dose escalation” and “pharmacokinetics” studies — that is, work to ascertain its dose-effectiveness and the way it is distributed and then broken down and eliminated by the body — in order to enable an application for human tests.

Nanopartical startup Bind Biosciences hooks $2M award for targeted drugs — Bind Biosciences, a Cambridge, Mass., biotech developing nanoparticles capable of ferrying drugs to specific locations in the body, received a $2 million grant to further its work. NIST provided the funding.

Bind Biosciences is one of several startups hoping to tailor the biological, physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles in ways that will cause them to hone in on particular tissues or protein targets. By attaching drug molecules to these nanoparticles, it should theoretically be possible to turn them into a new version of “smart-bomb” targeted therapies. Other startups at work in this space that we’ve written about include Tempo Pharmaceuticals and Carigent Therapeutics (see our coverage here and here).

Oriel Therapeutics raises undisclosed sum for new drug inhaler — Oriel Therapeutics, a Research Triangle Park, N.C., device maker focused on a new form of inhaler, raised an undisclosed sum in a third funding round, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The investment was lead by New Leaf Venture Partners; the company declined to disclose other investors or the amount. Oriel claims to be developing a new type of “active” inhaler for drugs for asthma or lung disease.

OTHER HEADLINES OF NOTE:

• Houston’s ThromboVision gets $1.5M grant for personalized-medicine diagnostics (Houston Business Journal)
• Infusion-services firm Critical Homecare Solutions files for $125M IPO (Edgar)
• Belgium’s Ablynx, maker of mini-antibodies from llamas, plans IPO later this year (Reuters)

UPDATE: Expanded items on Xcellerex, Maas Biolab, Bind Biosciences, and Oriel Therapeutics.

Featured companies: Atritech, Avalon Partners, Ensemble Discovery, Hyperion Therapeutics, LifeBond, ReShape Medical, SafeStitch, Trophos, UltraShape

Hyperion Therapeutics raises $40M against GI and kidney disease — Hyperion Therapeutics, a South San Francisco, Calif., specialty pharmaceutical company, raised $40 million in a second funding round. Investors included Sofinnova Ventures, Highland Capital Partners, New Enterprise Associates and WRF Capital.

Hyperion, which buys the rights to test and market drug candidates from other companies, said the proceeds will allow it to complete a licensing agreement with Medicis Pharmaceutical’s Ucyclyd subsidiary, build out its management team and advance its clinical trials. The company’s two leading candidates address a genetic disease called urea cycle disorder, in which toxic ammonia builds up in the blood stream, and hepatic encephalopathy, a neurological complication of cirrhosis.

Atritech raises $22M for clot-prevention device — Plymouth, Minn.-based Atritech, a developer of a device designed to prevent dangerous blood clots, raised $22 million in a fourth funding round. Investors included SightLine Healthcare Vintage Fund, Prism Venture Partners and other existing investors.

Atritech’s device, which it calls the Watchman system, is essentially a tiny mesh basket designed to be implanted in the opening to the heart’s left atrial appendage, a small pouch on the top of the heart. That pouch is often the source of blood clots in patients with atrial fibrillation, a condition in which the heart’s upper chambers beat too fast. Ideally, the implanted basket will catch clots that threaten to escape into the bloodstream, where they could cause a stroke.

The funding will allow Atritech to finish enrolling patients in a late-stage trial of the Watchman device, which is being tested against a blood thinner typically given to prevent clots from forming.

UltraShape gets $15.1M for “body contouring” — UltraShape, an Israeli developer of ultrasound systems designed to break down fat cells for cosmetic purposes, raised $15.1 million in a fifth funding round. Investors included Meritech Capital Partners, Israel Seed Partners and Polaris Venture Partners. The company’s non-invasive device isn’t approved for use in the U.S.

Trophos raises $11.6M for neurological drugs — Trophos, a Marseille, France, biotech focused on developing new drugs for neurological conditions, raised $11.6 million (€8.5 million) in a third round of funding. Investors included OTC Asset Management, CM-CIC Capital Privé, Society General Asset Management (SGAM), Viveris Management, Turenne Capital Partners, Blue Medical and the Association Française contre les Myopathies.

Trophos develops drugs that it believes will promote the survival of neurons threatened by degenerative neurological diseases such as Huntingdon’s disease. Its leading candidates target neuropathic pain and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, better known as Lou Gehrig’s disease.

SafeStitch goes public in reverse merger, raises $4M in debt — SafeStitch, a Miami medical-device maker without a Web site, went public in a reverse merger with the defunct firm Cellular Technical Services. The company will list its shares on the American Stock Exchange. As part of the deal, SafeStitch raised a $4 million line of credit from the Frost Group, a private-equity firm, and also takes control of $3 million in cash held by CTS. The company makes devices for minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery.

NationsHealth acquires Diabetes Care & Education for $3M — NationsHealth, a Sunrise, Fla., provider of medical products and insurance-related services, acquired Diabetes Care & Education, a provider of insulin pumps and related supplies for diabetics. NationsHealth will pay $3 million, $2.5 million in cash and $500,000 in unregistered common stock.

Obesity-device maker ReShape Medical pulls in $3M — ReShape Medical, a Lake Forest, Calif., developer of minimally invasive medical devices to treat obesity, raised $3 million in a follow-on to its first funding round, PE Hub reported, citing a regulatory filing. Investors included New Leaf Venture Partners and SV Life Sciences. The company was previously known as Abdominis, and has now raised a total of $8 million.

Avalon Ventures raises $84 million in eighth fund — Avalon Ventures, a La Jolla, Calif., venture-capital firm specializing in life-science and wireless-technology companies, raised $84 million in an eighth fund, VentureWire reports (subscription required), citing a regulatory filing. Avalon previously raised $75 million for its seventh fund, which closed in 2005.

LifeBond gets $1.5M for new surgical bandages — LifeBond, a Jerusalem-based device company, raised $1.5 million. Investors included GlenRock Israel and the Zitelman Group.

LifeBond is developing a bandage that exudes a sticky gel when it comes into contact with blood, presumably creating a barrier that minimizes blood loss.

Ensemble Discovery , a Cambridge, Mass., biotech, named former Pfizer vice president Michael Taylor as its CEO. Ensemble is developing new drugs and tests based on large, repetitive molecules called macrocycles.

Ensemble raised $17 million in a first funding round in 2004, and in February VentureWire reported that the company was closing a second round in the “tens of millions.”

BioRelix, a New Haven, Conn., developer of new antibiotics, raised $25.75 million in a first funding round, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The round included New Leaf Venture Partners, Aisling Capital, CHL Medical Partners, Novartis Venture Fund, Elm Street Ventures and Alexandria Real Estate Equities.

BioRelix is developing antibiotics that target what the company says are common stretches of bacterial RNA that control many functions essential for bacterial survival. The funding should allow the company to push a drug candidate into human tests by late 2009 or early 2010, its interim CEO told VentureWire.

Interlace Medical, a stealthy Newton, Mass., developer of gynecological devices, raised $5 million in a first round of funding, VentureWire reports. Spray Ventures and New Leaf Venture Partners led the round. PE Wire reports that the startup is focused on the market for polypectomies and myomectomies, which are surgeries for the removal of polyps and fibroids.

(Note: This item has been copied over to the Life Sciences page from its original location on the VentureBeat main page. To view it in its original context, with comments, click here.)

Venture investors’ interest in early-stage biotech companies may finally be starting to revive, nearly six years after the collapse of a biotech-stock bubble quashed appetites for the industry’s riskiest but often most innovative companies.

Biotech fundraising is certainly booming. The industry newsletter BioCentury (no link available) recently reported that biotechnology pulled in nearly $2 billion in venture capital during the first quarter, topping the previous record of more than $1.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2000. A recent survey by law firm Fenwick & West* revealed that 79 percent of Bay Area biotechs saw their valuations rise during 2006, compared to 65 percent in 2005. Those rising valuations follow years in which the dreaded “down round” — a funding event that lowers the dollar value of a company — had become commonplace.

The bigger question, however, has been whether VCs would also renew their interest in early-stage biotechs — companies so young it could them a decade or more to push a new drug or related product through development and the regulatory approval process. Once making up the bulk of biotechnology in the first place, early-stage companies fell out of of favor after the 2000 biotech-stock bubble collapsed. Battered VCs shifted their attention to more mature companies that offered quicker “exits” — that is, profits on the venture investments — via initial offerings or acquisitions. Some in the industry worried that innovative but risky drug development and technologies might languish as a result.

Although it’s still early, venture funding for early-stage companies may be starting to pick up. Last month, for instance, a genetics and molecular-imaging startup called Numira Bioscience raised $2.5 million in first-round funding, $2 million of that from vSpring Capital. A few days later, Affinium Pharmaceuticals, a proteomics company-turned-antibiotic developer, raised $18 million as part of its restructuring and drew in Forward Ventures as a new investor.

Since enthusiasm for biotech tends to wax and wane periodically, VCs such as Phillipe Chambon of New Leaf Venture Partners say the resurgence of interest in early-stage companies reflects “the pendulum swinging back in the opposite direction.” One main reason: Cash-rich Big Pharma companies are desperate to bolster their own drug-development efforts by acquiring biotechs. (Even established biotechs like MedImmune are feeling the pressure to put themselves up for sale.) Since the pharmas are increasingly willing to buy even less mature biotechs, venture capitalists see early exits growing more likely, which in turn makes them more comfortable about funding the industry’s youngest companies.

At least, so goes the theory.

(*Disclosure: Fenwick & West is a sponsor of VentureBeat)