VentureBeat

Posts Tagged ‘RNA-interference’

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

quark-pharma-logo-150px.gifQuark Pharma gets $27M for RNAi drugs – Fremont, Calif.-based Quark Pharmaceuticals, a biotech startup working on “RNA interference” drugs, raised $27 million in an eighth funding round. The company’s fundraising follows a failed attempt to go public last year, and reflects a somewhat smaller haul than the $30 million it had hoped to raise.

The company’s backers include investment vehicles of SBI Asset Management and SBI Investment, both subsidiaries of Tokyo-based SBI Holding. The investment cements Quark’s deep relationship with Japan; its previous investors include two other Tokyo-based investment partnerships, the Trans-Science Global Bio-Technology Fund and Asuka DBJ Investment LPS, and the company has long worked with several Japanese pharmaceutical companies as well.

Quark’s work in RNAi — the use of short RNA molecules to “silence” disease-related genes — has already produced two drug candidates that are in clinical trials. One is being tested in the eye condition known as age-related macular degeneration by Pfizer; Quark is testing the other as a way to prevent acute kidney industry.

Danny Zurr, Quark’s CEO, said the startup will use the funding to greatly expand  its clinical-trial program. By the second half of this year, the company plans to have its drug candidates in five different tests at Quark and Pfizer. We’ve written a fair bit about Quark and its colorful history over the past year or so.

targetrx-logo-150px.gifTargetRx takes in $9.6M for physician-prescribing data – TargetRx, a Horsham, Pa., startup that analyzes physician-prescribing behavior for drug companies, raised $9.6 million in a new funding round. Its backers include Quaker BioVentures, New Enterprise Associates and Domain Associates.

Target bills itself as a company capable of providing “unparalled insights” into the way doctors prescribe drugs — always a subject of great interest to pharmas of all stripes. In practice, Target appears to get its information by paying doctors to participate in online marketing programs held in a closed forum on its Web site.

The company claims that its methods provide useful predictive information about physician behavior. In certain respects, its approach isn’t all that different from Sermo, which has begun selling access to its online doctor forum to investors and pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer.

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

RNAi developer PhaseRx gets $4M of a pledged $19M – Investor interest in RNA interference, an ancient cellular mechanism for silencing dangerous genes, continues apace. PhaseRx, a Seattle biotech, has raised $4 million of a pledged $19 million first funding round, the Seattle Times reports.

Investors included ARCH Venture Partners, 5AM Ventures and Versant Ventures. PhaseRx will draw down the rest of the cash as it achieves various milestones.

The company seems to have neither a Web site nor a press release, and the newspaper story isn’t particularly illuminating on the subject of what PhaseRx intends to do. This Seattle Post-Intelligencer article has more details, however; apparently PhaseRx plans to use some form of synthetic polymer to help RNAi molecules cross into cells. (It’s unclear whether the polymer would also help stabilize RNAi molecules, which are fragile and prone to disintegrate before reaching their targets.)

tyrx-logo-150px.gifTyRx Pharma, drug-device combo maker, raises $25M – Monmouth Junction, N.J., medical device maker TyRx Pharma raised $25 million in a new financing round. Investors included Clarus Ventures and Pappas Ventures.

TyRx focuses on implantable polymer-mesh bags meshes that have been coated with drugs of some kind. Its first product, the succinctly named AIGISrx CRMD Anti-Bacterial Envelope contains two antibiotics and is intended as an enclosure for implantable defibrillators designed to prevent infection. (UPDATE: The AEGISrx is actually the company’s most recent product. It also sells the Pivit, a similar polymer-mesh pouch for hernia surgeries. Also, the current financing round is the company’s fifth, according to VentureWire.)

agennix-logo-150px.gifAgennix aims at $40M for cancer drugs – Houston’s Agennix, a biotech developing drugs for cancer and other conditions, hopes to raise $40 million in a late-stage round to fund clinical trials, VentureWire reports. The company hopes to close the round by mid-year. Agennix is developing a bioengineered version of a human protein called talactoferrin that plays an important role in regulating the immune system. Agennix plans to use the funding to fund two late-stage, phase III trials of the drug in lung cancer.

cardionet-logo-150px.gifCardioNet sets IPO terms, aims to raise $96M – San Diego’s CardioNet, a maker of wireless cardiac-monitoring devices that hopes to buck the recent trend of IPO collapses, set terms of its proposed IPO and now hopes to raise as much as $95.8 million.

The overall IPO, however, would be much larger — as large as $182.2 million, in fact — because existing CardioNet investors plan to sell more shares than the company itself. While there’s certainly precedent for this sort of thing — Masimo, another Southern California diagnostic-equipment maker, raised nearly a quarter of a million dollars in its IPO last August, the vast majority of which went to selling shareholders, conditions now are far worse than they were six months ago.

CardioNet plans to price its shares between $22 and $24 apiece. Its IPO, it turns out, is part of a complex financial arrangement whereby its last round of funding — $110 million raised last spring — didn’t put a valuation on the company. Instead, those investors received a promise of common stock in the form of shares that convert on the eve of the IPO. The down side here is that if the IPO doesn’t go well, those investors may be hosed. See here for more details.

quark-pharma-logo.gifLast June, I posted about the long and winding history of Fremont, Calif.-based Quark Pharmaceuticals, a biotech developing drugs based on a new gene-silencing technology called RNA interference, or RNAi. At the time, I labeled the company a biotech chameleon — a term I used to describe biotechs that reinvent themselves, often abruptly and without looking back.

In that sense, Quark is still a chameleon, by which I don’t mean anything pejorative — biotechs turn on a dime all the time, often for very good reasons (failed clinical trials, for instance, being a prime example). Some biotechs, however, reinvent themselves for less admirable ends, such as shifting gears to catch rising investor enthusiasm for a sexy new technology or drug-development strategy. In that earlier post, I raised the possibility that Quark had done exactly that by licensing its experimental RNAi drugs from another company and then rushing to declare itself a pioneer in RNAi therapy.

That part, however, turns out not to be true. I’ll lay out the whole story below the fold for anyone interested, but the short version is that Quark has been ill-served by earlier public statements made by its partner Silence Therapeutics that incorrectly implied that Silence had originally discovered what are now Quark’s leading RNAi drug candidates. These are the statements I alluded to in an earlier post, in which I quoted Quark CEO Danny Zurr saying that Silence had been “deceiving the public” by inaccurately describing the two companies’ relationship.

After looking into the Silence-Quark partnership more deeply, my current understanding is that Quark developed both its leading RNAi candidates with help from Silence, but only licensed certain nucleic-acid chemistry from its partner, not the RNAi molecules (or sequences) themselves. The bottom line is that Quark appears much more justified in its claim to be a leader in RNAi therapeutic development than I originally thought.

Before getting into all that, a quick update on Quark’s recent funding efforts. Gavin Samuels, the company’s VP for business development and investor relations, says Quark has lined up a syndicate of investors who have pledged roughly $20 million of the company’s intended $30 million funding round. The final $10 million may be provided by new investors who join that syndicate, although Samuels said Quark may also simply wait another three months or so to raise those funds. One factor weighing on the company is a pending “milestone” payment Quark is expecting soon from Pfizer, and whether that will be enough to carry the company into mid-2009 without the need to raise another $10 million. (Biotechs love such milestone payments, which are typically “non-dilutive” cash infusions that don’t shrink startup founders’ ownership stakes or require other existing investors to pony up in order to maintain their stake in a company.)

Samuels also told me that Quark’s abortive IPO last year foundered for both internal and external reasons, including market jitters following the huge Blackstone Group IPO last June that hit right as Quark was hoping to price its offering. The company itself, however, wasn’t blameless, he says. For instance, Quark may have jumped the gun by trying to go public when it only had one drug in early-stage human testing; in addition, Samuels says, the startup hadn’t done enough to make its case with journalists and market analysts.

Anyway, on to the convoluted history of Quark and Silence after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

Aptamer-drug maker Archemix withdraws its $72.5 million IPO – I’ve expanded this news into a standalone item on the state of the life-science IPO market here.

orametrix-logo-150px.gifOraMetrix raises $20M for robotic orthodontic systems – Richardson, Tex.-based OraMetrix, a maker of 3-D robotic systems for orthodontic use, raised $20 million in a new funding round, peHUB reports. The financing is either a third round (as peHUB puts it) or a sixth (as VentureWire reports based on an interview with the company’s CFO). Existing investors, including Rho Capital Partners, Versant Ventures, Brentwood Venture Capital and Star Ventures, provided the cash.

Founded in 1998, OraMetrix makes and sells what it calls the SureSmile system for orthodontic braces. After taking a 3-D scan of a patient’s mouth, an orthodontist can then use the system’s computer modeling to develop a treatment plan. A robotic system then precisely bends the “archwires” that push teeth around.

OraMetrix claims the system shortens the duration of treatment and reduces office visits. The company has sold the system since 2004 and told VentureWire that it has installed SureSmile for more than 200 doctors, but says it needs to roughly double that figure to reach profitability.

arrayit-logo-150px.gifMicroarray maker TeleChem goes public via reverse merger – TeleChem International, a Sunnyvale, Calif., maker of gene-chip microarrays that is also known as ArrayIt, went public via a reverse merger with Integrated Media Holdings. The companies don’t quite call it a reverse merger, but given that IMH shares have traded at around two cents since September, the company has a shareholder’s deficit of $1.5 million and noted in its latest quarterly filing that there is “substantial doubt” about its ability to remain a going concern, the dots aren’t all that hard to connect.

Technically, IMH acquired TeleChem’s existing shares in exchange for 35 million shares of the merged company, which will undergo a one for 30 reverse split. At yesterday’s IMH close of, yes, two cents, that values the deal at about $21 million.

biovascular-logo-150px.gifBioVascular pulls in $11M for platelet-disease treatments – San Diego’s BioVascular, a specialty pharma focused on drugs for fighting blood clots related to heart surgery, raised $10.9 million in a third funding round. Investors included BB Biotech Ventures, Merck KGaA and Domain Associates.

The funds will allow BioVascular to complete early-stage trials of two drugs, saratin for the prevention of clotting in grafted vessels following heart-bypass operations, and BVI-007, a platelet-production inhibitor it acquired last year when it bought out the biotech Revitus.

cequent-pharma-logo-150px.gifCequent Pharma adds $4.5M for for RNAi drugs – Cequent Pharmaceuticals, a Cambridge, Mass., developer of drugs based on the gene-silencing technique called RNA interference, added $4.5 million to its first funding round, VentureWire reports. The new cash, provided by existing investors Novartis Option Fund, Ampersand Ventures, Nexus Medical Partners and Pappas Ventures, brings Cequent’s total funding in the round to $13.5 million.

RNAi involves the use of short stretches of RNA that engage ancient cellular mechanisms for silencing the output of particular disease-related genes. RNA, however, doesn’t enter cells easily, so Cequent is working on a way to use genetically engineered, non-disease-causing bacteria that will enter human cells and produce the desired RNA molecules locally. We covered Cequent’s previous funding here.

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

progen-logo-150px.gifCellGate acquired by Australian cancer biotech ProGen for $2.5M –CellGate, a Redwood City, Calif., biotech working on new cancer drugs, sold itself to ProGen, an Australian biotech also focused on cancer, for the equivalent of about $2.5 million. The release is here. Needless to say, this represents a fire sale for a biotech that seems to have run out of time.

CellGate was pursuing drugs that aimed to shut down the growth of cancer cells either by inhibiting polyamine or by “turning down” the activity of cancer-related genes. ProGen will conduct an 18-month assessment of CellGate’s first drug candidate, a polyamine inhibitor that had already completed an early stage, phase I clinical trial, before deciding upon a mid-stage, phase II program. ProGen will also evaluate a stable of CellGate’s preclinical drug candidates.

ProGen will issue shares worth $1.5 million for CellGate’s assets, and will assume net liabilities of roughly another $1 million. The sale represents a significant loss for CellGate’s investors, including Healthcare ventures and New Enterprise Associates, who as recently as 2002 put $10 million into the company in a fourth funding round. I haven’t been able to piece together how much CellGate raised over its lifetime, although it’s certainly considerably more than that $10 million.

traversa-logo-150px.jpgTraversa raises $2M for RNAi-delivery technologies – Traversa Therapeutics, a La Jolla, Calif., biotech working on ways to deliver RNA-based drugs to their cellular targets, raised $2 million in a first financing round. Investors included San Diego Tech Coast Angels, Mesa Verde Venture Partners and Morningside Group.

Traversa’s work is intimately involved with RNA interference, a newly discovered technique for “silencing” disease-related genes using short strands of RNA that trigger a natural cellular mechanism for shutting down genes. Getting those short RNA molecules into cells in the first place, however, isn’t particularly easy.

Traversa claims to have solved that problem, although it doesn’t appear to be saying how. The company will license its RNA-delivery approach to drug companies, and also offers it for use as a drug-screening technology.

remitdata-logo-150px.gifRemitDATA, Web-based healthcare-service co., takes in $5M – Memphis, Tenn.-based RemitDATA, a provider of Web-based healthcare-data services, raised $5 million in a new funding round.Noro-Moseley Partners and SSM Partners provided the funding.

RemitDATA offers Web-based tools for individual physician practices designed to help them track insurance and Medicare reimbursements and scan paper records into digital form. The company also makes a sales-management tool for the homecare industry.

promedior-logo-150px.gifPromedior pulls down another $5.5M for fibrotic disease – Promedior, a Malvern, Pa., biotech focused on fibrotic disease, raised an additional $5.5 million as an extension to its first funding round. Polaris Venture Partners, Morgenthaler Ventures, HealthCare Ventures and Easton Capital participated in the financing.

Fibrotic disease is a general name for conditions that entail repeated bouts of inflammation followed by scarring that, over time, can lead to organ failure. Examples include heart failure, cirrhosis and kidney failure. Promedior aims to develop drugs that can slow or reverse the scarring process, and intends to begin clinical trials of its first drug candidate this year. The company previously raised $7 million in its first funding round.

Acrongenomics takes 11 percent stake in Molecular Vision – Acrongenomics, a Swiss company that acquires and develops life-sciences technology, took a 10.5 percent stake in Molecular Vision, a developer of credit-card sized diagnostic devices. Acrongenomics had previously announced its intent to acquire Molecular Vision, so presumably this is the first step in that plan. The release is here.

Hepatitis drug-developer Biolex withdraws IPO – Biolex Therapeutics, a Pittsboro, N.C., biotech developing ways to manufacture protein drugs in an aquatic-plant system, withdrew its planned $70 million IPO. We previously covered Biolex and its IPO dreams here.

NovaMin raises $2.5M for dental-care products – NovaMin, an Alachua, Fla., company working on tooth-remineralization products, raised $2.5 million in a third round of funding and expects another $2.5 million, VentureWire reports. Intersouth Partners provided the financing.

Cardious aims at $1.5M for heart-valve repair – Cardious, a Northfield, Minn., medical-device company working on a heart-valve bypass device, is raising $1.5 million in a first funding round, VentureWire reports. The company aims to raise the funds from angel investors. Cardious is developing an aortic-valve replacement that can be put in place on a beating heart, rerouting blood flow around the damaged valve.

quark-pharma-logo.gifFremont, Calif.-based Quark Pharmaceuticals, a biotech developing drugs based on a new technology called RNA interference, hopes to raise $30 million in an eighth funding round, VentureWire reports. Last year, Quark sought $80.5 million in an ultimately abortive IPO.

Quark apparently hopes to close the round within the next few weeks. The company hasn’t given up hope of going public, and now envisions re-filing its IPO in mid-2009. Quark, a biotech chameleon with a long and convoluted history, has so far raised roughly $72 million, according to VentureWire.

For the record, I should note that Quark CEO Danny Zurr objects to the characterization of his company as a Johnny-come-lately in the field of RNA interference, a clinically unproven way of “silencing” disease-related genes using short, tailored stretches of RNA. I wrote earlier, based on a number of fairly unambiguous press releases, that Quark had licensed its two leading RNAi drug candidates from Silence Therapeutics, then known as SR Pharma. In an interview a few months back, Zurr told me that Silence had been “deceiving the public” with its public statements, and that Quark had targeted the two genes in question on its own.

I didn’t write about my discussion with Zurr at the time because I wanted to explore the background further, something I obviously haven’t yet done. But with a new funding looming, I’ll do my best to get to the bottom of all this with Silence shortly.

TODAY’S HEADLINES:

tacere-logo-150px.gifTacere Therapeutics strikes RNAi deal with Pfizer for up to $145M — San Jose, Calif.-based Tacere Pharmaceuticals, a biotech developing new drugs based on the gene-silencing technique known as RNA interference, struck a partnership deal with Pfizer that could be worth up to $145 million. The company’s release is here.

The deal involves Tacere’s leading drug candidate for hepatitis C. Known as TT-033, the drug consists of short stretches of RNA designed to trigger cellular mechanisms that shut down the activity of specific genes — an exciting but so far still unproven approach. In this case, TT-033 aims to shut down three separate parts of the hepatitis C genome, theoretically not only inactivating the virus, but also preventing the development of resistant viral strains.

Tacere is already co-developing TT-033 with Oncolys BioPharma of Japan, and in fact has deep Japanese roots, as the company also received its founding capital from Hokkaido Venture Capital of Sapporo, Japan. (Our coverage of the Oncolys deal is here.) The Pfizer deal appears to be complementary to Tacere’s previous agreement, as the Big Pharma will receive worldwide rights to TT-033 excluding Asian nations. Pfizer will fund all future development of the drug, and will make milestone payments to Tacere as development proceeds. TT-033 has not yet entered human testing.

aragon-sugical-logo-150px.gifSurgical-device maker Aragon Surgical receives $25M — Aragon Surgical, a Palo Alto, Calif., developer of surgical instruments, raised $25 million in a second funding round. Investors included Bay City Capital, Integral Capital Partners, Delphi Ventures and Onset Ventures.

Founded in 2005, Aragon develops tools and instruments intended to speed surgical procedures and to improve their safety. The company is working on two major classes of devices — “electrosurgical” instruments, which use electric current to stop bleeding, remove growths and cut tissue, and tools that improve the speed and safety of minimally invasive surgeries known as laparoscopies. Last September, Aragon launched its first product, the LapCap, which guides a needle used to inflate a patient’s abdomen with gas in order to reduce the risk of inaccurate placement and injury.

benvenue-logo-150px.jpgBenvenue Medical raises $15M for spine-repair devices — Mountain View, Calif.-based Benvenue Medical, a developer of minimally invasive devices for spine surgery, raised $15 million in a second funding round. Investors included Three Arch Partners, Versant Ventures and De Novo Ventures.

Benvenue is developing spinal implants designed for the treatment of spinal compression fractures and degenerative disk disease via spinal fusion. The company’s Web site is a stub, and it doesn’t seem to have described its technology in much detail yet.

Stem-cell biotech BioE seeks $3.5M — St. Paul, Minn.-based BioE, a provider of stem-cell products for the drug and biotech industries, hopes to raise $3.5 million in a first funding round, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The company has so far raised $30 million from angel investors, and disclosed its plans in a regulatory filing. The funds will allow the company to commercialize lines of “multi-lineage” progenitor stem cells and a system for processing and freezing of umbilical-cord blood stem cells.

Inovise raises $3.4M for heart diagnostics — Inovise Medical, a Portland, Ore., developer of cardiac diagnostics, raised $3.4 million in convertible notes, VentureWire reports, citing a regulatory filing. The company is in the midst of fundraising for a sixth financing round. Inovise makes a non-invasive cardiac monitoring system called Audicor that records and analyzes sounds emitted by a beating heart.

Fairway Medical pockets $1M for medical devices, aims for $10M — Fairway Medical Technologies, a Houston incubator that develops a variety of medical devices, raised $1 million from angel investors and is looking to draw another $5 million to $10 million in a first institutional round later this year, VentureWire reports. Founded in 1992, Fairway Medical in-licenses medical devices and ushers them through the development process.

Cancer-drug biotech Genspera pulls in $650K, looks for $5M more — Santa Monica, Calif.-based Genspera, a biotech focused on cancer drugs, raised $650,000 in a seed round and aims to close another $5 million in funding later this quarter, VentureWire reports. The company plans to list its shares on the Nasdaq over-the-counter bulletin board following the financing. Genspera is working on cancer drugs using technology licensed from Johns Hopkins University.

E-trolZ looks for $400K for electrophysiology devices — North Andover, Mass.-based E-trolZ, a developer of electrophysiology measurement devices, raised $400,000 in a follow-on to its first $1.2 million funding round, VentureWire reports. The company is developing components that measure various physiological signals and which can be integrated into other medical devices.

Featured companies: AerovectRx, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Harmony Information Systems, Intelligent Hospital Systems, Merrion Pharmaceuticals, Syntaxin, SymBio Pharmaceuticals

UPDATED: Expanded items on Harmony Info, SymBio Pharma and Merrion Pharma, added Dicerna item.
UPDATE REDUX: Added Syntaxin item.

syntaxin-logo.gifU.K. biotech Syntaxin raises £16M for pain and nervous-system drugs — Syntaxin, a U.K. biotech focused on drugs that affect cell secretion, raised £16 million ($33.2 million) in a second funding round. The company’s release is here.

Investors in the round included SR One, the venture capital arm of GlaxoSmithKline; Life Science Partners; Abingworth; Johnson & Johnson Development; and Quest for Growth. Syntaxin is developing drugs derived from bacterial toxins that block the release of chemicals known as neurotransmitters, which may be useful in treating pain, respiratory disease, neurological problems and obesity and related metabolic disorders.

harmony-is-logo.jpgHarmony Info, a healthcare IT provider, raises $28M to fund acquisition and expand sales — Reston, Va.-based Harmony Information Systems, a maker of healthcare software for government agencies and nonprofits, raised $28 million in a second funding round consisting of equity and debt. Investors included JMI Equity, Updata Partners, ORIX Venture Finance and Comerica Bank.

On Monday, Harmony announced the acquisition of rival Synergy Software Technologies for undisclosed terms. Harmony provides IT systems that handle electronic medical records, billing and insurance-claims management.

symbio-logo.jpgJapan’s SymBio Pharma closes in on ¥2B funding — Tokyo’s SymBio Pharmaceuticals, a specialty pharma founded in 2005, is near closing a ¥2 billion ($17.4 million) third round of funding, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The company is focused on acquiring and developing drugs for cancer, blood disease and autoimmune conditions.

Co-founder Lowell Sears, a former Amgen CFO and now CEO of Sears Capital Management, has long been active in the Asian pharmaceuticals market. From VentureWire:

He was a founding investor, for instance, in Peninsula Pharmaceuticals Inc., an Alameda, Calif.-based company that licensed late-stage antibiotics from Japanese companies. Johnson & Johnson acquired Peninsula in 2005, and Forest Laboratories Inc. bought Peninsula spinout Cerexa Inc. in January.

Sears and Fuminori Yoshida, whom Sears once hired to be president of Amgen’s Japanese unit, started SymBio to do the reverse of Peninsula by acquiring Asian product rights.

Like JapanBridge, an MPM Capital-founded company we wrote about here, SymBio essentially aims to acquire drugs or drug candidates from elsewhere in order to win regulatory approval and sell them in Japan.

merrion-logo.jpgIrish specialty pharma Merrion slashes IPO range — Dublin’s Merrion Pharmaceuticals, a specialty pharma we last checked in on over the weekend, sharply lowered its expected IPO range. The company, which had hoped to sell as many as 4.6 million shares (listed in the U.S. as American Depositary Shares) for $10 to $12, now expects only $6 to $7 per ADS.

That lowers Merrion’s maximum IPO take to $32.2 million, down from an earlier $55.2 million, and gives the company a post-offering market capitalization of up to $122.9 million. Merrion rejiggers existing drugs to make them easier to take by mouth.

New RNA-interference biotech Dicerna shoots for $13M, aims to work around RNAi patents — Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, a stealthy, Boston-based biotech in the field of RNA interference, aims to raise $13 million in a first funding round, the In Vivo blog reports. The company, co-founded by John Rossi of Duarte, Calif.’s City of Hope National Medical Center and Mark Behlke of Integrated DNA Technologies, is focused on making new drugs via the “gene-silencing” properties of RNAi while sidestepping a patent thicket that has grown up around the technology. The company expects to close its funding in November.

Unless you’re a nucleic-acid chemist (or a patent lawyer focused on same), the details of Dicerna’s strategy are most likely beside the point, although I’m sure the In Vivo folks would welcome your attention if you’re really interested. Suffice to say that the company’s founders believe they’re found a new way to build these gene-silencing molecules that isn’t covered by some of the fundamental patents in the field. If that’s true — and no one will really know for years, if ever — it could spark new attention from Big Pharma and other biotechs that have so far sat out the increasingly frantic, and expensive, race to make RNAi drugs.

As with any early-stage technology, it’s helpful to bear in mind that no one has yet demonstrated that RNAi molecules can even work as safe and effective drugs, much less that they’ll be the magic bullet that some have claimed. Still, a lot of money has been sloshing around the field recently (see our coverage in the third item here), and there’s little doubt that deep-pocketed folks still on the sidelines will want to at least check out Dicerna’s claims.

OTHER HEADLINES OF NOTE:

buffalo-roundup-1.jpgHouse-Senate confrontation set over biogenerics – Late last month, a key group of senators reached agreement on legislative provisions that would authorize copycat versions of biotech drugs, which are typically complex proteins manufactured by genetically engineered cells (see details here and here). These provisions would finally put biotech drugs — which don’t face cut-rate competition once their key patents expire — on a par with traditional pharmaceuticals, and have been a long time in coming. They’re not perfect, but they’re about as good a compromise as we’re likely to see any time soon..

The catch is that biogenerics supporters want to attach this langauge to a reauthorization of the FDA’s user-fees act, the awkwardly named PDUFA, which has to pass by September to keep the FDA operating smoothly. The Senate’s version passed in May, whereas the House just approved its version yesterday — but didn’t include a biogenerics pathway. The senators want to add it to their version of the bill, which has to be reconciled with the House version in a conference committee. But key House members, including Energy and Commerce Chairman John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, appear likely to object, since they haven’t had a chance to weigh in on the provision.

The upshot: Turf wars between the houses of Congress may cost us our best shot at biogenerics legislation in some time. Tying the measure to PDUFA would be one of the best ways to sidestep legislative roadblocks that opponents and their biotech/pharma backers are likely to throw up — but the window is closing rapidly. The WSJ has more here.

Digital medical records are good for your health — or are they? One of the strongest arguements for digitizing medical records is that they’ll help prevent medical errors and improve medical care. A recent review of other studies in the journal Health Services Research gave digitized records a strong vote of confidence when it found that hospitals that switched to electronic drug-ordering systems saw a 66 percent drop in medication errors. (Such mistakes apparently kill 500,000 U.S. hospital patients every year.) Similarly, a report from the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association predicts that electronic prescribing could save Medicare as much as $29 billion over the next two years while preventing two million medication errors.

As with any technology, however, electronic records are no panacea. Another study of walk-in doctor visits found no improvement in treatment quality among practices that used electronic medical records versus those that still relied on paper. The study’s conclusion: Implementing digitized records is just the first step — doctors and medical groups still need to do a lot of work to get the most out of them.

On a related note, a Senate committee recently passed legislation that would offer subsidies to convince doctors to install digital health-record systems.

RNAi is hot, hot, HOTOnce again, it’s boom times for a new drug technology, and this time the spotlight is on RNA interference — a fascinating but largely unproven method for turning off individual genes by using a short stretch of double-stranded RNA to activate ancient gene-silencing machinery inside cells.

The party really got started last year, when Merck paid $1.1 billion to acquire Sirna Therapeutics, a fledgling RNAi company that had barely managed to move a single drug into an early-stage trial. Now things have heated up even further. Last Friday, AstraZeneca struck a $400 million deal with Silence Therapeutics. Then on Tuesday, Roche stepped up to forge a $1 billion deal with Alnylam, an early pioneer in the area.

What’s worth remembering is that no matter how promising a technology like RNAi seems, putting it to practical use almost always takes far longer and costs more than people expect in the early stages. Just take a look at the roll call of other drug technologies that have undergone similar cycles of hype and disappointment — gene therapy, antisense, therapeutic vaccines. All remain promising — but none of them worked the first time out of the gate. Even monoclonal antibodies took close to two decades before anyone could make a reasonable drug with them. Maybe RNAi will be different — but I wouldn’t bet my wallet on it.

Have cancer vaccines gotten a raw deal? A paper in Clinical Cancer Research (described here) argues that regulators and companies may be too quick to dismiss clinical-trial results if they focus on tumor shrinkage rather than long-term outcomes like survival. That may well be true, as tumor shrinkage is a notoriously bad measure of whether drugs work or not, although it’s also worth noting that a reconsideration still wouldn’t have helped Dendreon’s Provenge vaccine, since its survival data was so statistically equivocal. (Separately, the SEC has now opened an informal inquiry into Dendreon’s public disclosures about Provenge this year.)

DNA transplant “transforms” microbial species – J. Craig Venter’s group at his eponymous institute takes the honors, described here in the WaPo. Next up: Transferring an entirely synthetic genome into a DNA-less microbe to create “artificial life,” something Venter says may happen within months. Similarly, here’s the NYT on the new science of “synthetic biology.” Brace yourselves.

Does “pay for performance” improve medical care? A few weeks ago, the WSJ said no, citing a Medicare experiment. Today, the NYT says yes, citing… a Medicare experiment! I’ll have more to say once my head stops hurting.

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis may harm fertility – Or so say the authors of a Dutch study described by the WSJ here. Several researchers seem to think the results need to be verified elsewhere before abandoning the procedure, in which a single cell is extracted from an IVF embryo for genetic analysis.

Stem cells tailor their own environments — At least according to Canadian researchers, who explored the specifics of how embryonic stem cells communicate with the cells around them. The Globe and Mail has the story.

Simple enzyme short-circuits bacterial drug resistance – Basically, it prevents bacteria from swapping the genes that confer resistance to antibiotics.

High-throughput output –

  • Vermont sets up a Web site comparing pharmacy drug prices (Kaiser)
  • Researchers discover molecule that may promote food allergies (BBC)
  • Breast-cancer risk genes may not influence survival (WSJ)
  • Congressional Democrats want to know who muzzled the former surgeon general (Bloomberg)
  • Scientists identify gene linked to autism (BBC)
  • Robotics help stroke patients regain function (NYT)

(NOTE: This item originally incorrectly stated that J. Craig Venter’s company, Synthetic Genomics, was involved in the research that transplanted one microbe’s genome into another. In fact, it was Venter’s own research institute, the J. Craig Venter Institute.)

Protiva, a Vancouver, B.C.-based developer of drugs based on the new technology of RNA interference, raised $3.3 million in debenture financing. Investors included GrowthWorks Capital, BDC Capital, the Canadian Medical Discoveries Fund and Kinetic Capital.

Protiva is currently embroiled in litigation against two other biotechs, including Sirna Therapeutics, another RNAi company acquired by Merck last December, and Tekmira Pharmaceuticals.

Quark Pharmaceuticals, the biotech chameleon I profiled here, delayed an IPO that the company expects to raise as much as $81 million, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The newswire said the Fremont, Calif., developer of RNA-interference drugs was slated to begin trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market today.

It’s hard to know what a postponement like this means, although I can’t help wondering if picky investors who have already turned up their noses at a number of biotech offerings this year are having second thoughts about Quark, which remade itself as an RNAi company on biotech’s cutting edge by acquiring two drug candidates and then renamed itself earlier this month. We’ll see when and if they make it out the IPO gate; watch to see if they come close to their predicted $12 to $14 per-share offering price.

Tacere Therapeutics, a San Jose, Calif., biotech developing new RNA-based drugs, struck a partnership with Tokyo’s Oncolys BioPharma to co-develop a treatment for hepatitis C. The companies didn’t disclose financial terms of the deal.

In exchange for an undisclosed equity investment in Tacere, Oncolys will hold an option to acquire Asian rights to Tacere’s drug TT-033, which Tacere hopes to move into clinical trials late next year.

TT-033 is a drug based on a new and so far unproven technology called RNA interference, or RNAi, which uses short snippets of RNA to “silence” particular genes. In this case, TT-033 contains three separate RNAi molecules designed to shut down replication of all strains of the hepatitis C virus. The drug is to be delivered via what the company calls “an AAV protein coat,” which seems to refers to the envelope proteins of an adeno-associated virus. Tacere claims that this strategy delivers the drug’s RNAi strands directly to liver cells, where the hepatitis C virus replicates.

(UPDATED: See below.)

chameleon.jpgFor some reason, biotechnology is rife with chameleons — companies that suddenly and radically alter their scientific strategy, disease focus or business model, sometimes to recover from a major failure, and sometimes just to be whatever faddish investors want them to be.

Today, for instance, Quark Pharmaceuticals — now a Fremont, Calif., developer of drugs that work via a new mechanism known as “RNA interference” — said in an SEC filing that it now hopes to raise as much as $80.5 million in an IPO. (That SEC document is here).

Quark, which is backed by Larry Ellison’s Tako Ventures, describes itself in the filing as a “clinical stage biopharmaceutical company” with an “initial focus” on drugs that work via RNA interference, or RNAi — a Nobel Prize-winning technique for “silencing” particular genes using carefully engineered snippets of RNA. It has two RNAi-based drugs already in human testing — RTP-801i, for a form of blindness called age-related macular degeneration, and AKIi-5, for kidney failure. RNAi drug development is getting a lot of big-money attention these days, as witnessed by Merck’s $1.1 billion acquisition of the RNAi biotech Sirna Therapeutics last year. (Pfizer has signed on to co-develop Quark’s RTP-801i.)

quark-logogif.jpgQuark, however, is a relative newcomer to RNAi, although that fact isn’t exactly clear in its filing. It acquired both of its leading drug candidates from Atugen AG, now a unit of Silence Therapeutics (which, confusingly enough, was formerly known as SR Pharma). The name Quark Pharmaceuticals is also new; until this month, the company was known as Quark Biotech, and before that as Expression Systems.

In other words, Quark’s conversion to RNA interference, or RNAi, looks like a classic chameleon move, made possible by its ability to quickly in-license drug candidates based on a hot new technology, thus allowing it to tout itself to investors as a cutting-edge biotech.

Based on what I know at the moment, I can’t say one way or another if Quark’s RNAi work is truly cutting-edge. I do, however, know that the company has an interesting and unusual pedigree that for most of its history had nothing to do with RNA interference.

Although founded in California in 1994 as Expression Systems — the name presumably refers to gene output, or “expression” — the company has long maintained its principal research facilities in Israel. Over much of its history, in fact, the company has frequently been classified more as an Israeli biotech than an American one. Consider, for instance, its listing on the Israeli Life Science Industry Web page. In addition, Quark’s SEC filing lists among its risk factors the fact that “[w]e have significant operations in Israel, which may be adversely affected by acts of terrorism or major hostilities.”

In 1997, the company renamed itself Quark Biotech and began to focus on genome-based drug development — that is, on identifying genes linked to specific diseases and then finding drugs that turn off those genes or otherwise mitigate their effects. In general, this sort of strategy hasn’t worked out so well, both because most of these disease-gene links have been faulty and because most genes have only a limited impact on disease.

Like other companies at the time — most notably Lexicon Genetics and Deltagen — Quark apparently thought it could identify these genomic drug targets by breeding mice in which important genes had been “knocked out.” A multi-year genomics research collaboration with the Cleveland Clinic Foundation led it to take the unusual step of moving its headquarters to Cleveland in 2001. Just two years later, however, when the company announced that it had created a mouse that totally lacked cholesterol — a discovery momentous enough for Science to publish it — the Cleveland Clinic wasn’t among its collaborators, and the company’s headquarters had moved again to Fremont, Calif.

Quark’s involvement with RNAi seems to date only back to 2004, when it licensed RNAi technology from the Silence Therapeutics unit Atugen. That collaboration pertained specifically to a gene called RTP-801 that appeared to play a major role in inflammation. The next year, the two companies expanded their agreement to cover RNAi drugs for five other undisclosed genes. Silence Therapeutics revealed that AKIi-5 was one of them in this press release:

SR Pharma expects to begin the clinical development of its proprietary AtuRNAi therapeutic molecules for systemic cancer indications in 2007. SR Pharma has sublicensed the AtuRNAi compound RTP-801i to Pfizer through its collaboration partner Quark Biotech Inc. for the treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and a number of other indications. This compound entered the clinic in early 2007. In addition SR Pharma has licensed a further AtuRNAi compound, AKIi-5, to Quark Biotech Inc. This compound has been granted an IND for acute kidney injury and is expected to enter the clinic in 2007.

That’s just part of Quark’s interesting history. It has long worked with several Japanese pharmaceutical companies, which explains why its second and third-largest shareholders are two Japanese investment partnerships, the Trans-Science Global Bio-Technology Fund and Asuka DBJ Investment LPS. (Ellison’s Tako Ventures is the largest investor, with 42.3% of the company.)

Quark hopes to price up to 5.75 million shares between $12 and $14 apiece, which would make Tako’s 5.6 million shares worth as much as $78.4 million. Overall, the company could have a market capitalization of as much as $256 million following the offering.

Biotech chameleons like Quark are fascinating because of the ease with with they shed their skin and morph into something new, often without ever looking back. Some, of course, do so for perfectly legitimate business reasons, while others seem most eager to catch new trends and to ride them as hard as they can.

It’s often hard to tell which is which, though, which is one reason I hope to occasionally spend some time looking at particular biotech chameleons to see how far their public image diverges from their actual history. After all, there’s nothing wrong with making a fresh start — at least so long as potential investors know exactly what they’re getting into.

UPDATE: Turns out Silence wasn’t such an authoritative source on the details of its partnership with Quark. I revisited the subject and laid out the company’s obfuscatory language and how it Quark’s actual role in developing its RNAi drugs in this post.