<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VentureBeat &#187; RT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/tag/rt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:07:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='venturebeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://venturebeat.com/osd.xml" title="VentureBeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://venturebeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<copyright>Copyright 2013, VentureBeat</copyright>		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Surface RT is more profitable than iPad (theoretically)</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/06/microsofts-surface-rt-is-more-profitable-than-ipad-theoretically/</link>
		<comments>http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/06/microsofts-surface-rt-is-more-profitable-than-ipad-theoretically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Koetsier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Surface RT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=570324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Unit for unit, could Microsoft's Surface tablet be more profitable than Apple's iPad? iSuppli certainly thinks&#160;so.</p>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=venturebeat.com&#038;blog=342986&#038;post=570324&#038;subd=venturebeat&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/06/microsofts-surface-rt-is-more-profitable-than-ipad-theoretically/medium_8126267833/" rel="attachment wp-att-570356"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-570356" title="medium_8126267833" alt="" src="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/medium_8126267833.jpg?w=800&#038;h=600" height="600" width="800" /></a>Unit for unit, could Microsoft&#8217;s Surface tablet be more profitable than Apple&#8217;s iPad? iSuppli <a href="http://www.isuppli.com/Teardowns/News/Pages/Microsoft-Surface-RT-More-Profitable-than-iPad-Teardown-Analysis-Reveals.aspx" target="_blank">certainly thinks so</a>.</p>
<p>iSuppli estimates that Microsoft&#8217;s 32 GB Surface RT tablet costs $284 to build. At a retail price of $599, that&#8217;s a markup of 111 percent, with a gross margin of 52 percent &#8230; and a profit of $312. Apple&#8217;s iPad, on the other hand, typically has profit margins in the 40-50 percent range.</p>
<p>The 16GB iPad mini, for example, sells for $329 and costs about $188 to build, yielding a markup of 75 percent, a gross margin of 43 percent, and a profit of $141.</p>
<p>So, theoretically, Surface tablets could be more profitable for Microsoft than iPads for Apple. The key word here is theoretically.</p>
<p>The hardware costs alone of a device are only a fraction of the actual costs, which include research and development, software development, marketing, and much more. Apple, having sold <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2012/10/23/apple-100m-ipads/">100 million iPads</a> to date and <a href="http://www.statisticbrain.com/apple-computer-company-statistics/" target="_blank">well over 200 million iPhones</a>, can amortize its costs over far more devices than Microsoft, which is hoping to sell three million in its first year.</p>
<p>It is interesting to see iSuppli&#8217;s list of the most expensive parts in the Surface RT:</p>
<p><a href="http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/06/microsofts-surface-rt-is-more-profitable-than-ipad-theoretically/2012-11-05_surface1/" rel="attachment wp-att-570348"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-570348" title="2012-11-05_Surface1" alt="" src="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/2012-11-05_surface1.jpg?w=454&#038;h=289" height="289" width="454" /></a></p>
<p>The touchscreen display is the biggest cost driver at over $100. That&#8217;s a shocking price, as it&#8217;s not even a high-def screen &#8212; the iPad3&#8242;s larger retina display <a href="http://www.iclarified.com/entry/index.php?enid=20806" target="_blank">cost $127</a> almost seven months ago. After that, is the Flash and DRAM memory, and the processor itself, an Nvidia Tegra3.</p>
<p>But is the Surface really more profitable than the iPad? In a word, no.</p>
<p>Even if it does make a good headline.</p>
<p><em>photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/squirrel02/8126267833/" target="_blank">squirrel83</a> via <a href="http://photopin.com" target="_blank">photopin</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank">cc</a></em></p>
<br />Filed under: <a href='http://venturebeat.com/category/business/'>Business</a>, <a href='http://venturebeat.com/category/gadgets/'>Gadgets</a>, <a href='http://venturebeat.com/category/mobile/'>Mobile</a>  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=venturebeat.com&#038;blog=342986&#038;post=570324&#038;subd=venturebeat&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/06/microsofts-surface-rt-is-more-profitable-than-ipad-theoretically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/medium_8126267833.jpg?w=160" /><source url="http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/06/microsofts-surface-rt-is-more-profitable-than-ipad-theoretically/">Microsoft&#8217;s Surface RT is more profitable than iPad (theoretically)</source>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/medium_8126267833.jpg?w=160" />
		<media:content url="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/medium_8126267833.jpg?w=160" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">medium_8126267833</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d4d24b12c84be6eecddf121bc3fee48?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">johnkoetsier</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/medium_8126267833.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">medium_8126267833</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/2012-11-05_surface1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2012-11-05_Surface1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
