Apple’s saving $9.2 billion in potential taxes by financing a chunk of its recently-announced $50 billion stock buyback via debt, Bloomberg says.

With the $10 billion share repurchase announcement made last year, the entire $60 billion stock buyback is the largest share repurchase plan in history, and will take until 2015. The problem is that most of Apple’s cash — some $100 billion U.S. — is overseas. And bringing that loot home would result in taxation at a 35 percent rate.

$35 billion extra in government coffers probably gives Washington hot flashes and sweaty palms, but it keeps Apple accountants awake at night. So the company is borrowing the cash it needs by issuing a record $17 billion bond offering with interest yields slightly higher than U.S. treasuries.

Borrowing money, paradoxically, is saving Apple money.

In addition, Bloomberg notes, interest Apple pays on the $17 billion debt financing will be tax-deductible, saving an additional $100 million a year.

This raises all kinds of issues about the ethics and morality of not repatriating cash and thereby avoiding taxes. Apple is not the only tech company that uses creative methods to reduce income tax payments — Google has a surprising $10 billion worth of revenue in tiny Bermuda, thanks to shell companies and wily sales of intellectual property. As a result, the search giant’s effective tax rate on overseas income is a ridiculous 3.2 percent.

And 50 other tech companies, including Microsoft, have collectively dodged $225 billion in U.S. taxes by sheltering their assets overseas.

The bigger question, at least for Apple investors, is whether propping up its own share price is a good use of Apple’s massive $150 billion in cash reserves. Other options, of course, include accelerating innovation — the company won’t release a significant new product in two quarters — or acquiring companies that could help it grow faster.

Share buybacks are typically done by companies who feel undervalued by the market. Perhaps Apple should be making moves to address that problem, rather than treating the symptom.

photo credit: TheeErin via photopin cc

As Bloomberg reports, the search giant routed almost $10 billion in revenues to its Bermuda shell company. And that’s not because Larry and Sergey like to fly their private jets to the island paradise for beach vacations and mai-tais.

It’s because using the Bermuda shell company saved Google $2 billion in taxes, slicing its overseas tax bill in half.

Bermuda is a well-known “tax haven,” making a Forbes list of the world’s best places to avoid paying taxes. Some companies have moved their entire head offices to the island nation because Bermuda requires corporations to pay absolutely no tax. The country began that policy way back in 1935 as an attempt to bring in offshore companies to develop the local economy.

Google and other companies move money to the tax haven via strategies such as the Double Irish, in which one corporation is set up in Ireland but located in Bermuda, thus being tax-exempt by Irish rules. This first company acquires the international intellectual property rights from the U.S. mother corporation and licenses them at an enormous rate to another Irish company, locally resident, which then takes the profits from all the other European subsidiaries.

But because the second company makes very little money (due to the huge IP licensing rates) it pays very few taxes. And the first company, which is incorporated in Ireland but resident in Bermuda, collects the tax-free cash.

The result of Google moving its revenue to Bermuda?

Google payed an effective tax rate of 3.2 percent of its profit earned overseas last year — a ridiculously low number. Most of the revenues moved to Bermuda are from European countries, which, of course, are not entirely satisfied with the arrangement.

This policy is not unique to Google. Apple employs similar strategies, as do Facebook and Microsoft.

While you can hardly blame a company for taking whatever steps it can to minimize tax burdens, it’s clear that the UK, France, and other countries would like to see income earned locally taxed locally.

Expect European Union nations to take steps to try to recapture some of the tax revenue they see as belonging to them.

photo credit: smallscreen via photopin cc