A new GamesBeat event is around the corner! Learn more about what comes next.
Under pressure from employees, Riot Games announced tonight that it will change a policy and let new employees opt to sue the company rather than be forced into arbitration during disputes.
Current and past employees are still bound by an evidently unpopular policy that forces them into arbitration during disputes, such as those that arose because of the sexism allegations.
“Over the last eight months, we’ve been internally focused on listening, learning, and acting as we work to transform our culture and create a more diverse and inclusive Riot,” the company said in a post. “Along the way, we’ve shared some of these efforts with you. You can read more about some of that work here, here, and here. In the spirit of transparency, we also want to address the ongoing public conversations around Riot’s arbitration agreements.”
Three top investment pros open up about what it takes to get your video game funded.
As prospective Rioters, former Rioters, players, partners, and fans, we need you to know where we stand today and how we expect that to change in the future, so we’re sharing with you now what we shared with Rioters earlier today….We’ve made a call that we will pivot our approach. As soon as current litigation is resolved, we will give all new Rioters the choice to opt-out of mandatory arbitration for individual sexual harassment and sexual assault claims. At that time, we will also commit to have a firm answer around expanding the scope and extending this opt-out to all Rioters.”
The company said, “We know that this resolution will not satisfy all Rioters. We understand and respect Rioters who choose to protest this decision on Monday, and admire their conviction and willingness to stand up for their beliefs.”
Riot Games employees have said they are planning a walkout over the arbitration policies.
The company said that its arbitration isn’t onerous, noting “not all arbitration agreements are the same.”
It said that:
- Riot covers all costs of the arbitrator.
- Both parties must agree on the arbitrator. Either party can reject an arbitrator — for example, based on their history of past cases — and the case will not proceed until a neutral arbitrator is selected.
- The plaintiff can hire a lawyer of their choosing.
- There is no confidentiality clause, which means the plaintiff can communicate about their suit against the company in the same ways they could in court.
- The plaintiff is allowed fulsome discovery.
- The agreement does not limit damages, which means there is no cap on total potential damages awarded, or the types of damages awarded — for example punitive or consequential damages.
The company said, “We are facing a complicated situation with no perfect solution, so arriving at a decision has not been easy. We are working diligently to resolve all ongoing litigation, so that we can quickly take steps toward a solution that more Rioters feel good about. This is where we are right now, but this is an ongoing process and there’s more to come.”
Riot said it is committed to various new diversity efforts over the next 30, 60, and 90 days.
GamesBeatGamesBeat's creed when covering the game industry is "where passion meets business." What does this mean? We want to tell you how the news matters to you -- not just as a decision-maker at a game studio, but also as a fan of games. Whether you read our articles, listen to our podcasts, or watch our videos, GamesBeat will help you learn about the industry and enjoy engaging with it. How will you do that? Membership includes access to:
- Newsletters, such as DeanBeat
- The wonderful, educational, and fun speakers at our events
- Networking opportunities
- Special members-only interviews, chats, and "open office" events with GamesBeat staff
- Chatting with community members, GamesBeat staff, and other guests in our Discord
- And maybe even a fun prize or two
- Introductions to like-minded parties