Connect with top gaming leaders in Los Angeles at GamesBeat Summit 2023 this May 22-23. Register here.

When I was shopping for my last laptop, I made a conscious effort to exclude all models with touchscreens. It was an easy way to narrow down the choices and made sense to me: Any money I could save on opting out of the touchscreen would be better served to beef up any other hardware component, or could just stay in my pocket. I had accepted that touchscreens made sense for smartphones and tablets but were useless in traditional computers.

Now, I’m not so sure.

I’ve been playing around with Microsoft’s Surface Laptop as my main rig for the last few weeks, and I like having the touchscreen there, even if I barely use it.

This hit me like a ton of bricks when I tried swiping a webpage on my old gaming laptop. Before having a touchscreen laptop, I had never made that faux pas. In my world, only the phone had a touchscreen, so that muscle memory simply didn’t exist for me. The fact it managed to develop so quickly after using a Surface Laptop for just a few weeks gave me serious pause.


GamesBeat Summit 2023

Join the GamesBeat community in Los Angeles this May 22-23. You’ll hear from the brightest minds within the gaming industry to share their updates on the latest developments.

Register Here

It also surprised me because I’m not very mobile with my laptops — I primarily use them as desktops. The reason I use a laptop as my main computer is to have the option to take it with me if I need to.

The same thinking extends to touchscreen laptops. My laptop is for work, and that means the main inputs for me are the keyboard and a mouse (I hate trackpads and only use them when I absolutely have to). I own a tablet, but it sits in a drawer that I never open — it’s too much effort to switch devices when my smartphone does everything I might need from a tablet. And yet, if I want to use my laptop for something that isn’t work, a touchscreen can come in handy.

Maybe I want to quickly resize what’s on the screen. Maybe I want to quickly hit the close button, and it’s simply easier to tap it. Maybe I want to swipe through a few photos and I know that will work faster than trying to figure out a given app’s user interface. Maybe I want to scroll through a webpage to a specific spot, and it’s easier to use my thumb to do so. Maybe I want to move to the couch, and that means I will be much closer to the screen, so skipping the mouse and trackpad makes most sense.

Let me be absolutely crystal clear: Touch should not replace mice and trackpads — and definitely not keyboards.

But I do want touch to come standard in laptops, just like how every one nowadays has a webcam and microphone built in. Desktops don’t come with webcam and microphones, but laptops do.

It’s a given.

Depending on what you use your laptop for, you may not access its camera and microphone for days, weeks, or even months. But when you need them, whether it’s that important international video call or a meeting you need to record, the tech is right there.

This is how I now view touchscreens on laptops. They aren’t the default input like on phones and tablets, but they’re pretty damn useful when you need to just reach out and manipulate whatever is in front of you.

And once they do become standard, developers will undoubtedly follow. Apps and games that simply make more sense to touch will become more readily available. None of these are going to replace production software and full-blown PC games, but if you want them, they’ll be an option.

Just like touchscreens themselves.

ProBeat is a column in which Emil rants about whatever crosses him that week.

GamesBeat's creed when covering the game industry is "where passion meets business." What does this mean? We want to tell you how the news matters to you -- not just as a decision-maker at a game studio, but also as a fan of games. Whether you read our articles, listen to our podcasts, or watch our videos, GamesBeat will help you learn about the industry and enjoy engaging with it. Discover our Briefings.