Successful CMOs achieve growth by leveraging technology. Join us for GrowthBeat Summit on June 1-2 in Boston
, where we'll discuss how to merge creativity with technology to drive growth. Space is limited. Request your personal invitation here
Vinod Khosla, the successful Silicon Valley venture capitalist who is leading the effort to raise a tax on oil extracted in the California, has responded to the oil industry’s charges that he has conflicts.
In an interview the WSJ (sub req), Khosla says his investments in alternative energies aren’t really a conflict with his $1 million support of Prop. 87, which would levy a tax on oil – even though some of the tax proceeds would support alternative energy research.
Mr. Khosla, in an interview, says he wouldn’t accept the seat on the proposed California Energy Alternatives Program Authority if it were offered to him. He also says that if any energy companies he backs receive money through the initiative, he will donate his profit on those investments to charity.
Here’s a guy who has leaned Republican in his political views, who now says he doesn’t want to profit from his energy investments, and that he’s doing this for meaning only — to combat what he says are the misleading claims by the oil industry about economic hardships the measure might cause. We’ll se how the oil industry responds, now that the “conflict” wind is out of their sails.
See our earlier piece here, where we pitted Khosla against a leading oil guy in a set of Q&As.
The WSJ story is worth reading. It says Google co-founder Larry Page, Wendy Schmidt (wife of Google chief executive, Eric Schmidt) and Kleiner Perkins venture capitalist John Doerr have all given about $1 million each to support the tax.
VentureBeat’s VB Insight team is studying marketing analytics...
Chime in here, and we’ll share the results.