They did it! YouTube bought by Google for $1.65B in less than two years

Updated

Google has agreed to buy San Bruno video-sharing site YouTube in an all-stock deal worth about $1.65 billion.

Under the terms of the deal, YouTube will remain independently operated at the outset, keeping a separate brand and keeping its headquarters in San Bruno, and all YouTube employees will remain with the company. Google will keep running Google Video.

This is a spectacular hit for the two founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, who started YouTube less than two years ago. Hurley, Chen and another key employee, Jawed Karim, each stand to make between $100 and $200 million from the deal, according to some reports.

Sequoia Capital, the venture firm that provided most of YouTube’s $11.5 million in backing, meanwhile, is said to have roughly 30 percent of the company, which puts its stake at about $495 million.

Of course, this is nothing like the Google IPO hit, where the take by Larry Page and Sergey Brin was in the billions of dollars, and where backers Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins made much more money too. But the comparison isn’t a good one, because Google held back from going public for several years, and was far more mature. Still, this solidifies Sequoia’s status as the valley’s top-dog venture capital firm for now.

Both companies have approved the transaction, which the companies expect to close in the fourth quarter.

Here is more from our earlier coverage on deals with large media companies the two companies have made, which go along way to solving YouTube’s copyright issues. At yesterday’s news conference, YouTube’s co-founders said Google’s promise to help YouTube create a system that could sort through the copyright mess was key to getting the deal done (see Merc story today.) Also, here’s a Merc piece about the company’s quick “garage-to-riches” story. It confirms the impression we at VentureBeat have from meeting the two founders: “extremely low-key” and “smart.”

Meanwhile, the analysis begins about what this merged company will be like. Both companies have shown the propensity to use their own judgement — sometimes difficult to decipher — about what gets to stay up on their sites and what doesn’t. Google raised controversy when it rejected some political ads. Now YouTube is getting push back, too, after its rejection of a video entry by right-wing blogger, Michelle Malkin.

Update: Artis Capital Management, a hedge fund in San Francisco was also investor in YouTube, something previously undisclosed. Artis co-invested in YouTube with Sequoia Capital in the startup’s $8 million Series B this spring, according to PE Week. In two rounds of funding, YouTube raised $11.5 million.

Next Story: Smalltown, the hyperlocal Web site, worth a look
Previous Story: 5 reasons why Google is looking to purchase YouTube

Bookmark and Share
Photo of Matt Marshall

About the Author, Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall is editor and CEO of VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter at @mmarshall, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • It's all back on. Time to invest in video people! There are other groundbreaking comanies (i.e. inCircles (see link), Tremmor etc) that are desitined for the same (if not greater) payoffs in the next few years. Video is just TV for heavens sake - it aint going away
  • www.video.sh
    www.mtv.sh

    Video Share site for cooperation.
  • I had wondered how YouTube was going to make money, and how they were going to pay for all that bandwidth. I guess they can pay their bills now! What a life.. a billion dollars AND you get to keep your job!
  • This is less about YouTube and much more about where Google is going. It is their Second Act. Good for them to step beyond Search and control this important user community. I have more analysis here: http://breakoutperformance.blogspot.com/2006/10... Thanks, Eric
  • Glad to see "The Google Test" validated once again. Enjoyed writing that one, Matt. Timing couldn't be better, and timing is everything.

    The naysayers will whine about what a lousy deal it is and whimper about copyright. But it's the right move for Google and YouTube. Google now jumps to the pole position in video.

    What's next? Not more portals - that deal's done. Look to accelerants to feed the flames - not underfunded YouTube wannabes. Like I said in the article, "As the rush to grab more consumer content surges, tools and services to make this material better, faster, cheaper become valuable. Rapid content generation services like blogs for text stories and services for video content accelerate and lower new content creation costs and time, supplying the pipe at a fraction of the cost of traditional approaches."

    William Jolitz.
    http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/09...
  • wizardofcrowds
    YouTube.com is located in San Mateo but not in San Bruno.
  • soon every damn social networking type site will be owned by the elite. and people think its just about money.......its about influence of people.

    sure money is a factor but what would you do if you belong to a "club" that wants to monitor and control society at large. myspace was bought for $520 million my Rupert Murdoch.

    i guess they are the only ones in the position to buy these gems. the same families that controlled the lands in feudal times, seriously. money is the root of most evil.
  • Good site! I'll stay reading! Keep improving!
  • dudesnow
    nooo i dont want it to be bought youtubes deleating channles for it!!!!!!!!!1and i just got mine!
  • wafsafsad
    You idiots, stop making youtube comments. Go die. I have the right to say the previouse sentence.