[Disclosure: Satisfaction was developed by a team led by Thor Muller, who is an advisor to VentureBeat. We have a close relationship with Thor. Since other sources have started writing about Satisfaction, you should read that too, since we may be biased.]
Satisfaction is a new San Francisco company that aims to improve online customer service by letting the customers effectively take over the process.
That’s a controversial mission, given that many companies struggle to handle even simple questions. Remember the controversy at Dell, where customer outrage about shoddy service ate away at the company’s brand, even as Dell’s customer service folks froze like deer in headlights? That company is still dealing with the fallout, and has, woefully late, come to its own conclusion it needs to put customers in charge.
Giving up control can be scary. Satisfaction hopes to show companies the advantages of doing this sooner rather than later.
Satisfaction has yet to launch officially. However, it has started by building a separate page for each company it serves. For example, we’ve been testing a page devoted to VentureBeat, where people can ask things like “How do I publish a contributor’s column at VentureBeat?” Satisfaction lets us respond. However, sometimes, like a big company, we may delay, or not answer it as thoroughly as some would like. Here, veteran VentureBeat readers familiar with our policies may be able to respond more quickly that we can. Satisfaction carries the answer from both ourselves and our readers.
Sometimes there are multiple answers to any given question. Rather than producing a fresh trouble ticket to respond to each customer, the company and user can see if a question is already answered — making the process more efficient.
Some of Satisfaction’s more compelling features will be rolled out in September. One will let users find answers even if the original questions were asked at another company’s site. For example, an Apple user may ask a question about Parallels, a software for the Mac. The best answer may reside at Parallels own site, and so Satisfaction will connect users to those answers.
Also, Satisfaction will soon automate the process for letting companies create a Satisfaction site for themselves. Right now, users must get approval for a new company to be added via Satisfaction’s beta form.
The company offers technology that works around the problem of questions that are very similar, even if phrased differently. For example, if a reader asks, “What are criteria for publishing a contributor’s column?,” Satisfaction would likely provide the same answers as it did to the slightly longer one above. This approach is called “fuzzy matching.” For instance, questions to a retailer may have multiple answers, depending on whether a customer is looking for help about a store on the East or West coast, or whether they are looking for answers to question about girls or guys shoes, for example. Customers indicate which answers they find useful, pushing those answers to the top.
When a company provides an official answer, it goes to the very top of the pile.
Satisfaction gives each question a separate URL. That way, if outsiders find the questions and answers relevant and start linking to them, they become relevant in the eyes of search engines. The hope is, this would push the questions and answers high enough for Google to show them high in its results — providing answers when people simply type in their question into Google’s search bar.
People can pose their questions on other social sites such as Twitter. A Twitter button at on Satisfaction lets them blast their Twitter friends with the question. Satisfaction does this by sending the friends a URL. The friends click on the URL, and are taken to the Satisfaction page to answer the question.
It has a number of sites testing the service, from Pownce to Timbuk2. You’ll see there are pages for things like Foo Camp (see Tim O’Reilly’s discussion about how to get in to Foo Camp), and about specific products (see the strings on Apple products Macbooks and iPhones).
It plans to make money later, for example selling services to companies to help them monitor trends and communicate with customers. First, Satisfaction wants to get an idea of the types of products people are talking about. Advertising relevant to the topics being asked may also be served.
The company is angel funded, and will likely be raising a round in the future. Besides Thor Muller, other founders include Lane Becker, a founder of Web design consultancy Adaptive Path, and Amy Muller, co-founder of Rubyred Labs.

10 Comments
-
Mahasureshi Shiva said:
Consumer-driven customer support is MADDENING! It’s great for the common problems, but aweful for specific problems that professionals have. Burying actual contact information so customers have to hide-and-seek makes me give thumbs down to outfits that employ this strategy.
-
Orli Yakuel said:
I’ve just noticed this is a Wufoo product. that’s interesting. BTW, the Venturebeat special page, looks kinda better then your webpage now :-)
-
Jonathan said:
Hi Mahasureshi.
I’ve often found the opposite to be true: for simple consumer problems I can get a good answer from someone reading a script in a call center, but for complex problems I have more success asking another professional who has encountered and solved the problem.
True openness also brings the real contact info to the surface rather than burying it. It used to be nearly impossible to find a customer support phone number for big web companies but now there are plenty of blogs that make a practice of publishing information that companies try to keep hidden.
Of course there are always issues that need to be addressed by the company, but by letting consumers get involved the number of such issues goes down and the company can concentrate on the most complex and important issues.
(Note that I’m a big believer in Satisfaction because I helped build it before it spun off from Rubyred.)
-
Matt Marshall said:
Orli,
Nice. I’m going to have to talk with Thor, since he designed this page too :)
-
Amy said:
Hi Orli,
Satisfaction is not a Wufoo product. We used Wufoo to manage our beta list email collection.
Best,
Amy
CCO, Satisfaction -
Michael Bazeley said:
We talked to some of the Satisfaction founders about their new venture in May. They had not yet finished building the service, but they spoke at length about the idea behind the company. Click my name above to get to the video.
-
benko said:
Not sure where GS is going to fit in.
Community based Q&A are in abundance: Yahoo answers, answerbag and Yedda (who are doing a fantastic job).
Support forums are also becoming very popular with allexperts, fixya and techlore.So I really don’t see where another site is going to fit in this flooded industry.
Also, I like their creative work but it will relate to extremely savvy users. These will never grow into a huge community.In short, the web2.0 bubble is reaching new levels and I expect a very near clash.
-
Ernest Berghof said:
Web 2.0 technology and techniques are perfect for customer support. All of us in technology learned long ago the best place to get your answer is a user forum.
Yes, the classic user forum, 1990’s technology.
What Web 2.0 brings to the table is a new set of tools, techniques, and models to create, search, and present user generate content - including support information.
Think of it as a social support community.
Users, super-users, and product/brand advocates have always built support communities. What has changed is the technology that makes this work. That is what Web 2.0 is all about - empowering communities with better social interaction options.
Satisfaction is on the right track.
-
BobP said:
I’m with Mahasureshi - my experience with Satisfaction is almost non-existent but it feels too much like voice-mail at a major telco.
I’ve got another beef - I signed up for an account using an email address I was faintly comfortable using with the small startup that was using this tool, but never would have used had I realized that I was part of this “satisfaction” startup. I eventually found a phone number and will call tomorrow and see if I can get my account records purged.
I’m sure there’s a niche for this kind of service, but I don’t want to be in it.
5 Trackbacks
9:04 pm
VentureBeat » Satisfaction, the Web 2.0 customer service site, raises $1.3M said:
[...] reviewed the company two months ago. Satisfaction creates customer support pages for companies and their products. But it goes beyond [...]
11:50 am
VentureBeat » Customer service in Silicon Valley? Who’d of thought said:
[...] Full disclosure: Satisfaction is led by Thor Muller, who is an advisor to VentureBeat. See our coverage of Satisfaction here. Tagged N/A VentureBeat [...]
9:36 pm
PaulStamatiou.com said:
Satisfaction: Slick People-Powered Customer Service…
We all know that customer service is a pain to deal with in most cases; waiting on hold to speak to someone in a noisy call center, not getting your problem solved and just going in circles. Some companies are better at this than others with online for…
7:39 am
Parature raises $16M for customer service software » VentureBeat said:
[...] (There are other startups trying innovative approaches to customer service too, such as Satisfaction, a San Francisco startup that allows consumers to drive the service process.) [...]
12:51 am
The next time you complain about a company on Twitter, Get Satisfaction may be listening » VentureBeat said:
[...] no idea how to do this — if they even knew what Twitter was at all. The more straightforward customer service angle that Get Satisfaction is taking with Overheard should help companies better understand such [...]