OnStor, a Campbell, Calif. company offering data storage for large companies, is the latest hoping to exploit a turn in fortunes in this once-dead sector. It has just gotten $27 million in more funding from venture capitalists who now have pumped $105 million into the seven-year-old company.
Storage companies are once again filing to public, despite very questionable fundamentals for many of them — but their private investors see a window of opportunity to finally get the companies off their hands. OnStor revealed its revenue growth to VentureBeat (see below), and it’s impressive. However it is still not profitable, it says, something it says will change over the next year.
Q1 2006 = $743,925 Q1 2007 = $3,778,911
Q2 2006 = $952,008 Q2 2007 = $4,322,575
Let’s rewind to 2002. This sector was filled with “walking dead” companies in this sector. After the bubble burst, Internet companies were reeling, the last thing peopled needed was more storage. Or if they did, they didn’t need 165 storage start-ups supplying it. That’s the number of companies venture capitalists funded in the preceding five years, as we cited at the time (sorry, article is long since buried in the Mercury News archives). VCs had pumped in about $2 billion into these companies amid a frantic lemming rush, and now if those companies weren’t dying, they were slashing their workforces in a desperate will to survive.
The need for storage always remained. Big corporations need help storing and securing the vast amounts of data they compile from managing business processes, from supply chains and inventory to customer relations.
Back to 2007. The public markets are doing well (or at least were doing well, until the shocks of recent days), and some storage companies are going public after hunkering down for years. And yet, some of the look worrying still. Isilon Systems, a similar company to OnStor, which went public in last year after $70 million in backing, has suffered recently, announcing greater than expected losses..
OnStor says it has 300 customers. Like other older start-ups, it’s discovering new sales pitches for new times. For OnStor, it’s the “greening of the data center,” in other words, making a company’s data infrastructure more efficient and thereby using less electricity helping save the environment. It does this better than big incumbents like NEC and Netapp, it says.
OnStor says its “storage arrays” offer a 95 percent power savings, 90 percent fewer devices to manage and 90 space savings (!). We haven’t verified this, but it’s a nice pitch, huh, given that many large corporations are issuing “green” mandates to do their part in fighting global warming.
The funding comes from Sand Hill Capital and existing investors Foundation Capital, Mayfield Fund, ComVentures, and Worldview Technology Partners. They’ve called this a “mezzanine” round, a term used as a clear signal to the market that this is the last round before going public.
The Taneja Group, a third party research group, is about to finish a white paper for OnStor about the greening of the data center.” It’s due out any day, and we’ll be interested in seeing what it says.
Tags: co:onsor, deal, inv:ComVentures, inv:Foundation-Capital, inv:Mayfield-Fund, inv:WorldView-Technology-Partners7 Comments
-
OneStoryOnStor said:
Matt, OnStor has taken in $100M already.
After that it now claims a revenue run-rate of $12M per year ($4M–their best quarter so far–times four). Add their previous years revenues together and it’s likely they won’t exceed $25M.
If they grow 100% the next four quarters–and that’s a stretch–they do $25M.
How’s that sufficient for an IPO? Time to dismiss the spin from their CEO (put out to prompt acquisition fever) prompted by their investors eager to recoup their investment.Unless it’s a bubble market I see the most likely exit for them an acquisition where the investors likley get 50-75 cents on their dollar and the employees get washed out (except for the CEO who has a carve-out). Remember, Worldview and ComVentures are in this deal together and readers of your blog know well the reputation of those firms and the partners and their track records
-
OneStoryOnStor said:
Oops. Errata in my last posting. $4M times four is $16M (rev run rate for ONeSTORy)
-
MJohnson said:
I worked at OnStor and left a few years ago due to lack of revenue momentum, product vision, and poor leadership. The low quality of the investors concerned me very much.
OnStor common shareholders believe this talk of an IPO over the next year and the “mezzanine” round is meant to prod an interested acquirer into acquiring OnStor and providing relief to the investors (and CEO). OnStor is under pressure from Worldview and ComVentures, thesmelves under pressure to wind up their poor performing funds and close shop.
-
GBal said:
It is true that a number of storage companies got funded since 2000, but it is also important to realise that there are a number of differences amongst these companies. Classifying all these companies as storage, is is like calling company that has got anything remotely connected with computers as a player in the “technology” industry. This is nothing but baseless journalism at its best without understanding the market.
-
Matt Marshall said:
Folks,
I’m told that the comments by MJohnson above do not come from Matt Johnson, the former VP of Engineering at OnStor. We’re told by one of OnStor’s investors that Johnson has reached out to each of the OnStor investors to clarify this fact. One of the investors requested we remove the comment. Rather than do that, I’ve decided to post this notice. Would have been great to hear from Matt himself, so that it would remove all doubt. He’s obviously decided to keep a low profile.
-
Run Rate said:
Glad to see someone is staying on top of things.
-
Sammy Wu said:
The product is crap, the system crashed on a monthly basis and even lost data several times. This was the worse decision I have ever made in my career
2 Trackbacks
10:52 am
VentureBeat » 3Par, the latest money-losing storage company, files for IPO said:
[...] a Campbell, Calif. company offering data storage for large companies, is preparing to go public, after a rocky ride. Isilion Systems went public a while ago, and is losing more money than expected. Data Domain went [...]
7:04 am
Garage Door Replacement said:
Garage Door Replacement…
Deported for Skipping School: Pro- Migrant Round- Up was the previous entry in this blog….