Venture capitalists invested about six percent more into Web 2.0 companies in the first half of 2007, but the increase was attributable to more deals in Europe and Israel.
Notably, early investors in Web 2.0 slowed their pace. For example, Silicon Valley’s Benchmark Capital backed just three deals during the first half of the year, with only one in the Bay Area. In 2006, Benchmark was the sector’s top global investor, with 16 deals. It was a similar story with Omidyar Network, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Storm Ventures, the survey found. The data comes from a survey by Dow Jones VentureOne and Ernst & Young.
Is the smart money leaving Web 2.0?
Not necessarily. Sequoia Capital and Draper Fisher Jurvetson, two respected firms, are the most active investors in Web 2.0 globally in 2007. However, both firms invest widely outside of the U.S. Maybe Web 2.0 is over in the U.S.?
In the U.S., investments in Web 2.0 were virtually unchanged from the first half of 2006, with 67 deals and $357 million invested.
Globally, investors pumped a record $646.2 million into 101 deals worldwide in the first half of the year. Within Europe, the United Kingdom posted the most activity, with a record seven deals accounting for $22 million invested. Belgium, Ireland and the Netherlands each saw their first Web 2.0 deal completed in the first six months of 2007, the survey found.
From 2002 to 2006, some 40 percent of Web 2.0 deals were located in the Bay Area. That figure dropped to just 20 percent during the first half. Even New England drew more money for Web 2.0 deals than Silicon Valley, according to the survey.
Finally, valuations of Web 2.0 companies have more doubled over the last year, meaning venture capitalists are having to invest more than double the amount to get the same ownership slice as they did last year. See table below.
Here’s the definition of Web 2.0 used by the survey: “Companies included in this study have a business model that revolves around a dynamic interface facilitating participation through such methods as user-created content, networking, and collaboration. Applications include podcasting, tagging, blogs, social networking, mashups, and wikis. Technologies used in these applications include: AJAX, RSS, SOA, CSS, XHTML, Atom, and rich Internet applications.”
More details of the study here in PDF.
7 Comments
-
Justin Davey said:
I don’t think that Web 2.0 is over in the US. I think investors are probably realizing that a lot of their investments are having poor or no returns and now they will sit back and wait for the next phase with business models adapted for early mistakes making profitability more likely and global adoption of Web 2.0 development and use. Then investments will continue. So much better than another boom-bust situation.
-
Tim said:
Smart money is waiting for more robust capabilities to be found in the rumored upgrade to 3.0, while those irritated by slow speed and frequent bugs are downgrading back to 1.5. An unnamed VC was quoted as saying that “a lot of our CSS needs are getting outsourced to foreign shops as they can deliver up to 65% more AJAX for the same price as US companies, and they really know how to leverage their XHTML.”
-
Bob Warfield said:
The Zimbra acquisition by Yahoo may just get them all wound up again:
http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/its-a-huge-week-and-were-just-getting-started/
-
Anthony Kuhn said:
Eric:
I would guess that as Web 2.0 continues to mature, there will be increased venture funding for business all over the world. I can also imagine there are some VC funds that are hesitant to get in on an unproven and rocky business model, but there are always some with more vision (or luck) who will be able to capitalize on the great potential Web 2.0 has for smashing returns. I cross-posted on your piece, alongs with a few comments of my own, at http://blog.innovators-network.org The Innovators Network is a non-profit dedicated to bringing technology to startups, small businesses, non-profits, venture capitalists and intellectual property experts. Please visit us and help grown our community!
Best wishes for continued success,
Anthony Kuhn
Innovators Network -
Ivan said:
love the design is awesomeone
-
George Kissi said:
Hi,
I’ve read through this and still can’t figure out what web 2.0 is! Can you shed some light?Regards
-
Jaseem Umer said:
George Kissi,
Web 2.0 are websites known as second version of internet. This include Wikis, Social networking etc.
20 Trackbacks
12:44 am
MoneyQs » Blog Archive » Has smart money abandoned US Web 2.0 companies? said:
[...] Brian White wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIs the smart money leaving Web 2.0? Not necessarily. Sequoia Capital and Draper Fisher Jurvetson, two respected firms, were the most active investors in Web 2.0 globally in 2007. However, both of those firms invest widely outside of the … [...]
2:25 am
web-zweinull » Blog Archive » Mehr Geld für Web 2.0 ausserhalb der USA said:
[...] Es fließt mehr Geld in europäische und israelische Web-2.0-Unternehmen. Für die Amis gibt es hingegen weniger Geld. Mehr dazu bei Venture Beat. [...]
3:26 am
Between the Lines mobile edition said:
[...] currency trader nabs $100 million in venture funds. VentureBeat: Has the smart money abandoned Web 2.0 companies? The Guardian: O2 wins Apple iPhone deal - at a hefty price. Dan Farber: Yahoo prepping Mash to [...]
5:02 am
The End of the Beginning at Like It Matters said:
[...] is tracking investment in ‘2.0′ ideas, and they see less investment in the states and more in Europe and Israel. (Do they not mention [...]
5:29 am
Slouching towards Golgonooza » Blog Archive » What is Web 2.0? said:
[...] the U.S., according to an article in VentureBeat, “investments in Web 2.0 were virtually unchanged from the first half of 2006, with 67 deals [...]
6:06 am
Has smart money abandoned U.S. Web 2.0 companies? « If you can dream it you can do it! said:
[...] Is the smart money leaving Web 2.0? [...]
8:20 am
Daily Headlines, 9/17 « Throbbing Gristle said:
[...] smart money abandoned U.S. Web 2.0 companies? : http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/17/has-smart-money-abandoned-us-web-20-companies/Venture capitalists invested about six percent more into Web 2.0 companies in the first half of [...]
11:03 am
Web 2.0 Investment Moving Offshore said:
[...] been seeing more and more Web 2.0 startups popping up even on far-flung tropical islands. A new study confirms what I’ve suspected for a while now: Web 2.0 investment is moving offshore. In the [...]
2:33 pm
FoxLand » Archive » Investment in the web grows in the UK and Ireland said:
[...] Now, more than ever, is the time to fine tune your brilliant web idea that will change the world – or at least get bought by Yahoo/Google/Microsoft/News Corp. Techcrunch UK (which has recently relaunched) discusses a study that shows growth in venture capital in the UK and Ireland. So, if you ever thought that it might be difficult to get venture capital unless you were based in Silicon Valley, now is the time to dust down your ideas. Update: Venture Beat has more about how venture capital is leaving Silicon Valley. [...]
2:51 pm
It’s a Huge Week And We’re Just Getting Started! « SmoothSpan Blog said:
[...] from the Windows platform over Outlook problems under Vista. This acquisition should also yield fresh encouragement for investors and entrepreneurs alike about what’s possible in today’s market. Zimbra’s investors reportedly only had [...]
6:57 am
runleft.com » Blog Archive » Has smart money abandoned US <b>Web 2.0</b> companies? said:
[...] entitled Has smart money abandoned US <b>Web 2.0</b> companies? from Google Blog Search: web [...]
6:59 am
runleft.com » Blog Archive » Has smart money abandoned US <b>Web 2.0</b> companies? said:
[...] Source: Has smart money abandoned US <b>Web 2.0</b> companies? [...]
8:35 am
Chris Heuer’s Idea Engine » links for 2007-09-18 said:
[...] VentureBeat » Has smart money abandoned U.S. Web 2.0 companies? Web 2.0 def: a dynamic interface facilitating participation through such methods as user-created content, networking, and collaboration. Applications include podcasting, tagging, blogs, social networking, mashups, and wikis. (tags: bubble2.0 web2.0 vc research funding investment trends socialmedia) [...]
9:46 am
Cogblog » Blog Archive » Is the smart money still confined to Silicon Valley? said:
[...] VentureBeat wonders if it is all down-hill from here based on the fact that KPCB and Benchmark have slowed their investment in Web 2.0 “stuff”. [...]
1:26 pm
links for 2007-09-18 said:
[...] VentureBeat » Has smart money abandoned U.S. Web 2.0 companies? From 2002 to 2006, some 40 percent of Web 2.0 deals were located in the Bay Area. That figure dropped to just 20 percent during the first half. Even New England drew more money for Web 2.0 deals than Silicon Valley, according to the survey. (tags: finance web2.0 vc funding startups trends) [...]
1:31 pm
ThemePassion - Best stuff in the web about design! » Has smart money abandoned US Web 2.0 companies? said:
[...] Brad Stone wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]
2:54 pm
CNM Ltd. & Co. KG - THINK FORWARD. THINK C-NewMedia. said:
[...] VentureBeat: Venture capitalists invested about six percent more into Web 2.0 companies in the first half of [...]
4:01 am
Startup Signal - Today’s Top Blog Posts on Entrepreneurship - Powered by SocialRank said:
[...] VentureBeat » Has smart money abandoned U.S. Web 2.0 companies? [...]
8:09 am
Rojo: TechCrunch40; NYTimes Freed; Taser Politics at Food Safety Trends said:
[...] Meanwhile, venture capitalists continue pumping money into Web 2.0 startups, but investment patterns are changing. Investors put $464 million into 101 deals in the first half of 2007, although for the first time, New England startups got more funding than did those in Silicon Valley and VentureBeat notes that the overall gain is largely due to investments in Europe and Israel. [...]
11:29 am
If you can count it on two hands… : Kitchen 2.0 said:
[...] You do realise that there was more major lottery winners in the UK in the first half of 2007 than Web 2.0 VC deals. In fact right now there are 17 unclaimed lottery winners, it could be you, totalling over £11 million which funnily enough equals what VC’s invested in the UK - $22 million invested. [...]