techcrunch40.jpgTen companies presented during today’s morning portion of Techcrunch40 conference in San Francisco. If we were able to have stock in these companies, here’s how we’d rank them: CastTV, Cubic Telecom, Yap, Cognitive Code, Viewdle, Powerset, Trutap, Faroo, Ceedo and Loudtalks. Summaries of each company follow.

CastTV, the video search engine — We’ve written about the company before, and it still hasn’t launched publicly. The development today is that it showed live demonstrations for the first time. It showed how a search for someone like “Britney Spears” yielded better results than Yahoo, Google or YouTube. For example, unlike YouTube, which showed primarily dated videos of Britney, CastTV showed more recent videos of Britney, and a mix of things like her in movies, or dancing, or in the news. Even Marissa Mayer, Google’s top product executive, one of the panelists chosen to ask questions of the companies, conceded that its interface, timeliness and clustering were strong. Not that she had any choice. CastTV showed a search for “Colts Titans” on Google video, and it showed a video of last year. CastTV has a game from yesterday. CastTV is different because it searches all sorts of surrounding code on pages to tell it what a video is about. It also indexes videos that may not have unique URLs. This may not become the biggest company of the bunch, but is likely to be bought by one of the bigger players — and so a good bet.

Cubic Telecom, a mobile company for international calling — Essentially, cheap overseas calls from anywhere, or at least cheaper than most calling plans. Their service, MaxRoam, is clearly well planned-out. For a more in-depth analysis, check out VentureBeat’s separate post today on the company. Competing mobile VoIP services are cheap or even free, but are unreliable. Its offering you a chance to take your regular phone oversees, without worrying about hassles.

Yap, speech recognition software for mobile phones — Yap’s application is aimed primarily at people who use text messaging. When the user speaks into their phone, Yap instantly translates what they say into a text message (although, in their demo, the translation was noticeably laggy). Aside from instant messaging, Yap also connects to various services, including Twitter, Digg, Wikipedia and commercial sites like Amazon and Ebay, sparing the user the need to type queries or messages. The text messaging service is monetized through suggestive text ads. For instance, if the user mentions a movie in theaters, Yap will suggest a theater to see it in. Although Yap comes with an all-star cast of developers who have worked on projects for AT&T and Apple, the question is whether the big mobile carriers will be interested enough to include Yap software on their phones, or whether the market will be restricted to people who download it themselves. There are other recognition technologies, so the risk is whether it will be adopted quickly enough.

Cognitive Code, offering conversational artificial intelligence – This company is newly launched. During its brief demo, the company’s executives asked questions of “Sylvia,” an artificial intelligence software that answered in a female voice to questions such as “Please close the Word file.” This is very early, but it was impressive that Sylvia seemed to understand some lengthy conversation questions (she’s doesn’t try to merely understand key words, but also the context provided by various words together). Sylvia worked half the time, but failed the other half. She’d do things like open documents instead of closing them as asked. It’s hard to see how much depth the company has, without someone not related to the company trying it out. The company wants to embed the service in other applications. The company says it wants to target 2009 (during CES conference) for hitting the market, and is aiming to embed the technology in toys and games.

Viewdle, a facial-recognition site for video search engines — This company recognizes images and faces in videos around the Web. It advances on what companies like Polar Rose are doing for images. The demo was notable. If you search for Britney Spears, the engine churns out a list of clips as a results. Select one of the clips, and it will open directly at the point in the video where Britney appears, even if only momentarily. More interestingly, the demo showed that if you searched for well-known models, it would pull up videos where all three appeared. You can then zoom in on one of the models, and search for videos only of her. It also provides names for other people it recognizes in images. The big question, however, is how the engine will recognize anyone who is not a star or famous. It counts on folks like you and me sending video links of ourselves, so that it can put us in the database.

Powerset, the semantic search engine we’ve written about before — The company is developing a way to understand the meaning search queries. So if you type in “What do politicians say about Iraq,” it provides results that don’t necessarily relate to those exact words, such “politicians.” For example, one result is an article with the words “President Clinton explains Iraq strategy.” The only new development today, however, is that Powerset announced three demo sites, including “Quotes,” “Business,” and “Powermouse.” The latter gives you insight into Powerset’s semantic database, so that you can see what things it associates with people or things. President Clinton for example, is a politician, lives in the White House, sets policy, etc. The question is whether people will use Powerset, when Google is so good.

Trutap, for mobile social networking — We’ve also written a separate post about this company here. It offers social networking over mobile phones. Features include messaging to groups, text messaging, instant messaging, and blogging in a reasonably straightforward phone application. Launches Friday. Although Trutap can rank xx place in this lineup, its future as a company is as hazy as any of the upcoming social networks. It’s looks functional, but the demo didn’t blow me away. Their focus seems distinctly British. During their presentation, the CEO sent a message to a “Friday Night Crew” planning a visit to a pub. Although it’s not an unreasonable scenario for American users, small social differences can mean popularity in one market, but failure when translated to another.

Ceedo, a lightweight visualization platform for mobiles — The term “visualization platform” doesn’t exactly inspire excitement, and neither did the company’s product. The platform transfers self-contained desktop environments from computer to computer; users can, for example, plug their USB dongle into a rented computer at a cafe and have their home software available. Ceedo has offered such software, for enterprise or personal use, for some time. Their product launch at TechCrunch is a similar platform for mobile phones. The software allows users to run their mobile phone platform on their computer, sending messages or downloading music. Or they can run their home desktop environment on a different computer by plugging in their phone. Although Ceedo’s platform appears to run seamlessly, it just doesn’t strike us as a must-have — and since their job is to convince mobile carriers to include their application on cell phones, that may be a problem. It has plenty of competitors, too.

Faroo, offering a peer-to-peer search engine — The service lets people download an application, so that they can contribute their searches and computer power to a shared search engine. Faroo follows what people search for, what result pages they look at, how long they they look at them, and whether they bookmark them. That way, they use people’s actions to rank a page higher in results. The company’s founder says that one million people using it can index 10 billion pages, meaning the entire Web. The big question, is who on earth would use this? How does it seed the engine with results so that they are relevant from the get-go, without forcing the early adopters to wade through painful early steps and making pages relevant? It is based in Erkrath, Germany. Long shot.

Loudtalks, an “internet walkie talkie” — Perhaps it was just bad luck, but Loudtalks’ presentation fell flat, between technical difficulties and the thick accents of its (apparently) Russian founders. The company’s computer software offers a way to instant message your friends with voice, speaking to them just as you would if you were sitting next to them. You can do this whether you’re on a computer or mobile phone. Loudtalks could prove to be a good idea, but numerous pitfalls spring to mind, among them having a hundred buddies simultaneously blabbing at you. It’s notable that while Loudtalks focuses on simply conveying a user’s voice, other services like Yap work to translate speech into text. It’s often most convenient to give the receiver a text message, even if the sender would prefer to speak. Finally, the voice market is crowded. Why would you download a separate program for this, when there are so many alternatives you’re already likely to be using.

(This was co-written with Matt Marshall.)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Trackback URL

8 Trackbacks

  1. TechCrunch 40, Day 1 (in progress) « Peter S Magnusson said:

    [...] It’s pretty clear that the current search engines are behind the curve on best practice. Like VentureBeat notes, companies like CastTV are good tech [...]

  2. Private Equity HUB - peHUB First Read said:

    [...] is doing some snapshot analysis (and rankings) of the companies presenting at TechCrunch40. See here and here. [...]

  3. Startup Signal - Today’s Top Blog Posts on Entrepreneurship - Powered by SocialRank said:

    [...] VentureBeat » New companies launch: Yap, Cognitive Code, Viewdle, Faroo & more [...]

  4. VentureBeat » Powerset, the hyped search engine company, sees shakeup said:

    [...] (see our coverage). It has opened a search box inside its Powerlabs, and offered several use cases such as Powermouse (see coverage). While the shakeup is a blow to the company, it still has substantial technology under its hood, [...]

  5. VentureBeat » Got email? Talk about it, with GoldMail said:

    [...] to make messaging easier to use. For example, we’ve also mentioned companies like LoudTalks (coverage), which offers voice instant-mesaging, and TokBox (coverage), which does embedded video messaging. [...]

  6. March 25th, 2008
    12:28 pm

    Roundup: MySpace in deals with labels, Tudou raises $53M, and more » VentureBeat said:

    [...] from Dubai-based investment group KIT Capital, according to VentureWire (subscription required). We covered Viewdle during its TechCrunch40 launch. Tags: co:iMeem, co:Mixx, co:MySpace, co:tudou, co:Viewdle, [...]

  7. April 4th, 2008
    4:46 pm

    What is CastTV? | CastTVBlog.com said:

    [...] on TechCrunch40 Conference and is one of the anticipated WEB2.0 projects. You can see the post here. If you want more informations, here is a video presentation of the [...]

  8. May 12th, 2008
    12:01 am

    5e1d4fb35b05 said:

    5e1d4fb35b05…

    5e1d4fb35b05bcdf7b55…

12 Comments

  1. Peter S Magnusson said:

    Hm, I had missed that Ceedo needed operator support, but you’re right. Anything requiring operator blessings is a tricky business model.

  2. Chris Morrison said:

    Peter: I don’t think the cooperate of mobile operators is required to run the software on a phone, but it makes the difference between a small and large market.

  3. MDH said:

    Was it required that each company have an unimaginative, me-too, Webby 2.0 company name to be considered?

  4. Peter S Magnusson said:

    Chris: it’s still unclear to me. Their new web info on the topic says “Ceedo is currently working with leading handset manufacturers, mobile operators, content providers and system integrators to bring Ceedo Mobile to the hands of end-users everywhere.”

    MDH: Lol! Indeed. Did you see Maher’s rant about goofy names?

  5. nilb said:

    Few comments: 1. Google is not that good (it is overhyped and overrated - see articles when you replace the logo of google with Yahoo and vice versa - how people still say that the results of Google logo (meaning Yahoo are better than of Yahoo logo) However, powerset is trying to educate people with a new kind of service - which probably won’t work. (Who really want to write a full question).
    2. In order to Viewdle to work they probably need some mass facial database (maybe they can make it if they will have facebook permision). Otherwise, they are probably only be good for celeb…
    4. Cast.tv - only have a chance of being bought. If Google or Yahoo really want they can replicate it (nothing that exciting) - and I don’t believe they can have any good IP to defend them…
    3. Yawnnn… most of this companies sound like something already been done or used… nothing really new or helping people. Wake me up with TC4 will be interesting

  6. nilb said:

    Few comments: 1. Google is not that good (it is overhyped and overrated - see articles when you replace the logo of google with Yahoo and vice versa - how people still say that the results of Google logo (meaning Yahoo are better than of Yahoo logo) However, powerset is trying to educate people with a new kind of service - which probably won’t work. (Who really want to write a full question).
    2. In order to Viewdle to work they probably need some mass facial database (maybe they can make it if they will have facebook permision). Otherwise, they are probably only be good for celeb…
    3. Cast.tv - only have a chance of being bought. If Google or Yahoo really want they can replicate it (nothing that exciting) - and I don’t believe they can have any good IP to defend them…
    4. Yawnnn… most of this companies sound like something already been done or used… nothing really new or helping people. Wake me up with TC4 will be interesting

  7. Chris Morrison said:

    Peter: Right — I was unclear before. Ceedo, and most of the other product releases that use mobile phones, all hope to have carriers (and others) pick up their service and put it on cell phones, rather than making the end users do that themselves. It’s like having a computer come with Internet Explorer pre-loaded rather than Firefox — the previous, regardless of its relative worth, has a huge advantage in gaining the initial audience.

  8. Alexey Gavrilov said:

    Chris, thanks for a thoughtful coverage of Loudtalks.

    I’d like to comment on some issues, which you brought up. There is no reason why a hundred of buddies would bubble at you simultaneously. This doesn’t happen with your IM, this won’t happen with Loudtalks. If there are people who would not respect your time, you probably don’t want to have them in your Loudtalks contacts.

    You make a valid point that sometimes getting the message as a text is more convenient. We don’t aim to be anything for every situation though — we only want to create the best experience for quick and unobtrusive conversations. Sure sometimes IM or email or SMS works better — fine, there is a place for all of us.

    It’s true that there are many voice services, but they are essentially a telephone. Loudtalks is closer to IM than to a telephone so we don’t really compete. There is no other program, which lets you do what Loudtalks does. I use it and it’s so much quicker that I don’t even think about switching to IM until I need to post a link or copied text. The obvious challenge is to have enough people actually try it.

  9. Chris Morrison said:

    Alexey: Thanks for the thoughts. It does help to think of Loudtalks as an IM service.

    My thought is that, although Loudtalks is neat, both the IM and voice spaces are so cluttered it may be difficult for an independent piece of software to compete — even one with a unique feature.

    When I think of Loudtalks, I can’t help but have the idea that it would be an awesome feature to add to an existing IM client. But I didn’t get any sense of whether you intend to compete or go towards being acquired — again, the technical problems during the presentation were just bad luck.

    Good luck with the company!

  10. Andreas Doms said:

    Faroo: “… who on earth would use this?”

    Everybody who understands that logging your personal searches by Google, your ISP or your administrator is not necessary to provide very good search results. (Nobody sees your keywords when you search with such an P2P engine.)

    Everybody who dislikes spam and paid rankings. (In a P2P network spam vanishes quickly, original content will be most important.)

    Everybody who wants to see the dark web not indexed by Google. The indexing is decentralized, so it will see parts of the web not reach by Google.

  11. Wolf Garbe said:

    > FAROO … who on earth would use this?

    Perhaps people would like to take their fair share from the search business, instead of giving the whole revenue to one single outgrowing company.

    > How does it seed the engine with results so > that they are relevant from the get-go …

    Until the final launch FAROO will increase the index size with an initial crawl, to prevent the “chicken or the egg” problem. This is the reason, why FAROO is still a private beta test, concentrating on the core p2p technology.

    > It is based in Erkrath, Germany. Long shot.

    I always thought that in the internet age the information flows through the solid submarine cables really fast between the continents ;-)
    When all the American search companies go to China, perhaps the Europeans could help out meanwhile in the US ;-)

  12. Igor Jablokov said:

    Chris, appreciated your summary on Yap’s TC40 presentation. Re: the lag, we specifically left some wait states in there so it would sink in with the audience regarding what’s going on (otherwise the thread would’ve raced by as fast as a desktop IM experience). With the actual performance being 1-2 seconds, I’d challenge any champion texter to beat that! ;-) Re: launch, it could be both an independent one & with certain carriers who asked for exclusivity; with the 1st approach, it’s a proven model since Greystripe had 20 million downloads of their off-deck ad-supported Java games delivered over-the-air. Thanks for your feedback!

Add a Comment