Sendori, monetizing domain names

updated
sendori.jpgSendori, a Silicon Valley based company that lets you bid for traffic from other Web sites, has raised an undisclosed first round of venture capital.

The site operates in an industry that has so far been quite shady, and it’s an improvement over some past practices. The funding news was first reported by Venturewire and SiliconTap (subscriptions required).

Here’s how it works. I might own Gamespot.com, but I’d also like to draw traffic from other sites, such as VideoGames.com, or Reviewsgames.com, which are domains that aren’t being used, but which may draw traffic from users not knowing any better. (The users typically get to one of those sites by typing in “VideoGames” in their browser, for example, without knowing if there’s anything there.) I can go to Sendori, and bid to get traffic from those sites. I must bid higher than anyone else to get it. By drawing the users to my site, I get more business.

Sendori sets the bids on a cost-per-visitor basis. The company claims that domain owners can see a 25 percent boost in revenues compared to other approaches, such as Google’s AdSense.

As mentioned, the domain name business has had a dicey reputation. It’s not uncommon to be redirected to a mal-ware infected site if you type in the wrong domain name (something that a separate Silicon Valley company, OpenDNS is trying to prevent). However, by creating a marketplace of quality advertisers, this should help minimize the problems.

On its face, the Sendori system doesn’t seem to require much technological sophistication. Yet, the company is trying to secure a patent on its process. Some of the technology elements include geotargeted redirects and click-fraud blocking.

sendori2.jpgSendori is, however, targeting a crowded market segment. Take a look at public company Marchex, which is a leading domain name aggregator (with a portfolio of over 100,000 domains). In its latest quarterly report, the company posted revenues of $33.5 million.

Another major player is Demand Media, which recently raised $100 million from Goldman Sachs.

Sendori’s venture round included investors First Round Capital, Baseline Ventures, Maples Investments and Felicis Ventures.

Update from an interview with founder Ofer Ronen: Ronen got the idea for Sendori at the MBA program at Cornell . He teamed up with classmate Dave Weldon.

By December 2006, Ronen was able to raise some angel funding. It helped that he already had a start-up under his belt: Karanga (a B2B e-commerce site).

The old approach was to setup an intermediate landing page for when a user types in a domain name. Sendori’s approach is to send users directly to advertisers who want to get the traffic. This lowered costs and improved targeting, he said. To see an example of this, click the following: www.austrianstamp.com. As you can see, it takes you to a specific page on eBay.

Sendori’s platform aggregates about 33 million visitors per month, Ronen said, noting that national advertisers want “volume.”

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags: , , , ,

Photo of Tom Taulli

About the Author, Tom Taulli

  • While I'm not a fan of parked domains in general, I think what Sendori is offering to the domain parking business can actually create a better experience for websurfers. Immediately taking users to useful content-rich site that (ideally) has what they want, instead of a lame page of ads is a good thing. It's why we offer users things like OpenDNS Shortcuts (which are like AOL Keywords that users setup and control).

    I support anything that delivers a better navigational experience to users and this could do that. This assumes, of course, that Sendori is restrictive in who they allow to advertise and redirect domains on their service. If someone redirects videogames.com to malware.badguys.rbn.ru then that'd obviously be a bad thing.

    I look forward to finding out more.

    -David (from OpenDNS)
  • "While I’m not a fan of parked domains in general"

    WOW this coming from someone (open DNS) who serves up yahoo ads on address bar typeos. How is that is any different than a parked domain name serving the exact same ads (even the same source - yahoo) as parked domains??

    I am an open DNS user, but think it is a bit hypocritical of you to say you don't like parking, when your company serves up the same thing.

    Example:

    As an openDNS user, if i type in nytimes.xim by accident, i get ads by Open DNS.

    So you are saying that parking pages are no good, but monetizing typos to the right of the dot are OK? Cmon.

    I hope Ny Times IP attorneys don't see this because you are serving up competitors' ads on their trademark, Dave.
  • John,

    Happy to hear your an OpenDNS user. We correct most typos like that, though we don't correct that one. You'll note we do provide a spelling correction for it on the page of results, highlighted in red.

    At somepoint, it'll be typo'd enough that we'll figure it out and it'll be automatically corrected just like nytimes.xom and 1000's of other typos are corrected too. My gut tells me not too many folks type nytimes.xim which is why our system doesn't auto-correct it, but instead just provides the choice.

    And our search results are just like Yahoo's and Google's, organic on the main area, and sponsored on the right and sometimes in the top rail.

    And, wildcarding a user's typo is entirely different from registering random generic domains and putting up ads. It's not illegal, but it's certainly a poor end-user experience and annoying.

    People use us because they have a choice -- people don't have a choice (right now) with domain parking.
  • Paul
    Nothing new, just a different name for an old service. This is the same business model advertising.com created years ago with their service to bid for domain traffic "visitorbid.com".

    Check this old link http://www.bidvisitor.com/faq.html
  • Referring to VisitorBid as being similar to Sendori is like saying that Google when it started was just another search engine and therefore non-unique. What made Google unique and what makes Sendori unique is the implementation and approach taken.

    VisitorBid.com failed because it did not make it easy for advertisers to bid on domain traffic. Advertisers did not have the time of day to pick individual domains to bid on.

    At Sendori we were able to grow our market because we let advertisers use the keyword lists (and bulk sheets) that they use within CPC networks. The keywords are then used to match domains.

    Plus, VisitorBid used client-side redirects which is technically a bad way to approach the problem.

    Also at Sendori we created APIs for both domainers and advertisers that helped us scale the market dramatically. There are many other innovations we've created which I can't detail here.
blog comments powered by Disqus