Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, smarting from the public pounding the company took for the ad feature it released last month that critics said violated user privacy, has written a public apology.
Significantly, he announces an option for full opt-out from Beacon, which is new. [Update: When we first tried it out this morning, the opt-out wasn't working clearly. The company has since fixed it, and it's working fine.]
Excerpts from his blog post:
“We simply did a bad job with this release, and I apologize for it…
…When we first thought of Beacon, our goal was to build a simple product to let people share information across sites with their friends….At first we tried to make it very lightweight so people wouldn’t have to touch it for it to work. The problem with our initial approach of making it an opt-out system instead of opt-in was that if someone forgot to decline to share something, Beacon still went ahead and shared it with their friends.
It took us too long after people started contacting us to change the product so that users had to explicitly approve what they wanted to share…Facebook has succeeded so far in part because it gives people control over what and how they share information.
..Beacon also needs to do the same. People need to be able to explicitly choose what they share, and they need to be able to turn Beacon off completely if they don’t want to use it.
This has been the philosophy behind our recent changes. Last week we changed Beacon to be an opt-in system, and today we’re releasing a privacy control to turn off Beacon completely. You can find it here. If you select that you don’t want to share some Beacon actions or if you turn off Beacon, then Facebook won’t store those actions even when partners send them to Facebook.
See image below for the opt-out feature.
4 Comments
-
Jin said:
“full opt-out” how very clever…
-
dave mcclure said:
sweet beacon-on-fire image there. nice job :)
-
gigi said:
Has no one noticed that the opt-out policy allows you to opt out of having your info/activities sent to Facebook? “These settings only affect notifications on Facebook…” So facebook still gets a ton of valuable market information. Why is no one in outrage at the companies volunteering to share usage with Facebook and demanding that they also have an opt-out program to opt out of the data sharing ?!? Hello, Yelp? Epicurious? Blockbuster? Overstock? NYTimes?
-
Dave said:
This “apology” was more harmful than anything because it exposes Mark for being either extremely slimy or extremely gullible:
“At first we tried to make it very lightweight so people wouldn’t have to touch it for it to work.”
Are you kidding me? This is sleaze-talk for “we were trying to sneak it in and not let users know what we were up to.”
“The problem with our initial approach of making it an opt-out system instead of opt-in was that if someone forgot to decline to share something, Beacon still went ahead and shared it with their friends.”
Lesson 1 with privacy involving THIRD PARTIES: Always make it opt-in. This is like setting all new free webmail accounts to receive spam by default and putting the burden on users to opt-out.
Sorry, Zucky, but it doesn’t work that way. You would think a multi-billion dollar valuated company would know better.
5 Trackbacks
1:34 pm
Startup Toolbox » Blog Archive » Not Ready for Sharing said:
[...] was pleased to see Facebook do the right thing by letting users opt completely out of Beacon. From the uproar it seemed clear that the world just wasn’t ready for that level of [...]
7:42 am
VentureBeat » Meebo introduces real-time chat in Facebook applications said:
[...] community’s tolerance of such things (privacy, in case you haven’t noticed, has been hotly debated recently on [...]
11:12 am
Live from the Facebook new profile meeting » VentureBeat said:
[...] seen in the past with Facebook, users don’t always like change. Nor does it want another Beacon situation. This is no doubt one reason Facebook has us here today to help “break-in” users to [...]
11:12 am
Live from the Facebook new profile meeting » VentureBeat said:
[...] seen in the past with Facebook, users don’t always like change. Nor does it want another Beacon situation. This is no doubt one reason Facebook has us here today to help “break-in” users to [...]
10:48 am
iWidgets thinks it has a way to monetize on the social nets. FriendFeed should steal it. » VentureBeat said:
[...] Remember Beacon, Facebook’s clever little ticket to revenue? The one that involved tracking your behavior on commercial sites and updating your friends about it without informing you first? If so, you’ll recall that it terrified privacy advocates, chased away advertisers and proceeded to go down in a blaze of user-generated fury. [...]