Job site NotchUp thinks companies should pay applicants for interviews

logo2.jpgNotchUp may seem like just another job site, but the Los Altos Hills company brings a novel twist to the familiar formula – companies have to pay applicants to come in for an interview.

Say what?

According to the NotchUp’s Web site, the goal is to give companies a chance to go after those top-notch employees who aren’t actively looking for a job. Founders Jim Ambras and Rob Ellis, both formerly of PeerFlix, claim to have collectively recruited hundreds of job candidates. Based on that experience, they declare that the system is broken for both companies and job applicants.

The company will be launching its product at DEMO next week, but VentureBeat was recently invited to participate in a private beta. Since I’m no stranger to the job search myself (I began working for VentureBeat just a few days ago), I decided to check it out.

Job applicants first fill out a profile. It’s all basic stuff, about as revealing – or not – as your average resume. (See mine in the screenshot below.) LinkedIn users can import their profiles, too.profile.jpg

As part of the set-up, applicants decide on a minimum fee that they’ll charge potential employers for interviews. NotchUp offers a calculator to help – you enter information such as education, salary and work experience, and the calculator gives you a suggested price. (See screenshot below.) I, for one, was pleased to see that companies should pay $200 for the privilege of speaking to me.

interview.jpg

I also typed in VentureBeat Editor Matt Marshall’s information, taken from his bio here. Now, I won’t go into a long comparison between Matt and myself – hey, it’s too early to ask for a raise – but it’s safe to say that he has substantially more education and experience. When it came to salary, I didn’t know what to enter, so I left it the same as my own. If nothing else, that would show whether those factors like education and experience are significant in setting the price.

It turns out they barely make a difference at all. Matt may have a Ph.D and more than 10 years as a journalist, but an interview with him is still worth $200.

Using the calculator involved a little bit of guessing on my part, since many of the job categories are kind of vague. By tweaking Matt’s position so he is an “executive,” not someone in “editorial,” I managed to increase his fee to $210. On the other hand, when I doubled Matt’s stated salary, his interview price jumped to $390.

Ultimately, I only learned so much about NotchUp from the beta, because I could only see the applicants’ side of the process. I doubt attracting job hunters looking to make some extra cash will be much of a problem.

The big questions, however, remain unanswered: Will this really fill employers’ needs? Are they willing to pay those interview fees?

The approach is a smart one because we hear of companies consistently offering finders fees for the best talent. Companies still pay serious dollars – in the thousands – to headhunters to find the right employees. Done right, NotchUp could cut out some of the middlemen and let companies find and approach candidates more directly.

On the other hand, as we found from tinkering, the site may need more research to provide the nuance necessary for a meaningful marketplace. It’s early days, though – the company hasn’t yet launched publicly – so we’ll be watching its progress to see if it can help ameliorate the job industry’s pain, which has seen scores of start-ups try all kinds of models to help, with few making significant traction.

[Update: A number of readers have complained in the comments thread below that they can't import their LinkedIn profile. We asked NotchUp about this, and VP Rob Ellis said the feature was temporarily disabled because LinkedIn wasn't happy.

"We have great respect for LinkedIn and are confident that LinkedIn will back up their public statements in regards to data portability," Ellis said. " While we already have a work-around that allows our users to continue importing their LinkedIn data into NotchUp, we want to first speak to LinkedIn and find a solution that everybody involved is comfortable with."]

Next Story: Livescribe, the pen with ears, gets big boost
Previous Story: deCODEme and its questionable disease-risk predictions

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • I see this as a flawed model.

    Who wouldn't be willing to do an interview for $300?
  • Yeah, I'd interview for $200.

    Anthony, re notchup's dismissal of my phd as having any value, that actually might be reasonable. My phd is in political science, and for most jobs, that spells danger. i'm way overqualified or wrongly fitted for most jobs.
  • I joined NotchUp Friday. The calculator said I should charge over $1,100 for an interview. I could do that all day! :-)

    This is the stickiest concept I have *ever* seen. And certainly the best inducement for allowing an application to scrape my LinkedIn profile and connections. They promise to share 10% of each connection's earnings! Whoohoo, I hope they get lots of employers signed up because I have lots of employable connections!

    If you want an invite to the beta just email me at stiennongmail.com ;-)
  • I think their viral strategy is pretty strong- I got three invites this week before hearing anything about them. The LinkedIn scrape worked well and they offer you the ability to select which of your LinkedIn contacts you want to send invites to.
    Will employers pay? That's the $64,000 question. I don't know how they are promoting that unless its a build it fast database plan, then pitch it to employers.
  • Tom Alsberg
    I just got a few invitations to NotchUp, so I signed up. Never heard of it before, but thought hey - what's there to lose?

    Then I got to this "name a price" thing which appeared quite silly, so I looked up any mention of this site, and I still can't quite understand the point.

    Why should anybody offer me money to invite me to an interview through NotchUp, if they can do it outside NotchUp for free?

    Let's say somebody finds my profile on NotchUp, and decides they might like to employ me. If I'd be interested anyway, then it's a waste of money, as they could save those $75 (that's the minimum price NotchUp let you state) by contacting me. If I talk to them just because they offer to pay me for it, and it's even more a waste of money, and time...

    Or do NotchUp expect that one who signs up will then make himself unavailable unless approached through that site?

    I must be missing something here. Or maybe not... Enlighten me.
  • Totally ludicrous. There would be much more mileage in a model when the applicant pays $5 to upload a CV so that employers don't have to sift through potential applicants who uploaded a CV on a whim after a bad day at work.
  • A colleague forwarded me this article, and what I find interesting is that no one apparently has noticed their Terms of Service and how they may effectively sell your name in the form of a list.

    All of your information may be secure, but what about your personal privacy? Are we so lured by the ease of use in uploading a LinkedIn profile and the notion that someone should PAY us to interview that we're willing to gloss over the details of our personal information?

    Clearly, the big story seems to be overlooked.

    Granted, I didn't make it to the privacy settings on the registration form because I had to agree to their Terms of Service, which I could not do. Maybe there's more than meets the eye here, but when compared to other sites, such as LinkedIn, I certainly did not feel the same sense of security.
  • Jennifer
    The Terms of Use on the site made me very uncomfortable as an individual an employer might seek.
  • Why would people who are in demand and making a good amount of money want to spend a day interviewing for a few hundred dollars? Especially if they aren’t actually interested in moving. For anyone that’s truly a good candidate, they would rather get paid to get HIRED.

    That’s where PROSUMES.COM comes in. Better business model, in my humble opinion.

    Granted, I helped launch the company but it just makes more sense.
  • The premise of this business model is that offering money will motivate otherwise happy employees to take time to interview for a new role. It does not address the client side of the value proposition. How does this service increase the probability a candidate will be qualified for a role. It doesn't. Only pre-screening interviews with HR or a recruiter can do that.
  • Jason
    Brad K., do you have some kind of Google Alert for NotchUp posts? I've read a half-dozen blog posts about NotchUp where you've attached your own "humble opinion" about this company you "helped launch." Please stop.
  • I'm having a hard time hiring for a position right now and would never consider using this. You interview because you want to work for us, not for a spiff. This seems like a total waste of time and money for employers (you know, those guys paying the bills).
  • Jacob Freis
    Hold on a second, I thought you had to be hired before you get paid! In anycase they didn't pay for a website design. I can't believe they stole the design straight off of Grandcentral.com
  • alinkedinuser
    I sent the following to Notchup's tech support:
    ===================================
    I'm a registered member and I've been trying more then a few times to import my profile (and contacts) from linkedin.
    It always fail, and I receive the following error:

    * We could not sign in to Linkedin with the below email and password
    * Please check both fields and try again

    I know that the login details are correct because I'm using them to enter Linkedin successfully.
    Is there a problem with the import feature?
    Can you please assist?
    Thanks
    ==============================
    The auto-reply I got from notchup
    ==============================
    We appreciate your support of our beta program. If your message is
    about the LinkedIn import profile/contacts features not working,
    please know that we are working on it and plan to release a new
    version soon. Thank you for your patience.

    If your message is about a different subject, we will respond to you
    as soon as possible.

    Regards,
    NotchUp Customer Support

    ===============================
    Thinking out loud: why did notchup waste my time
    letting me try over and over again to import my Linkedin
    details, knowing it does not work? A simple note on their
    web site will do. This dishonesty right at the beginning is
    not a good sign. They of all should know that people's
    time is valuable.
  • DavidE
    I tried 10 times to import my data from LinkedIn. The button seems to be gone now.

    I agree - not letting people know in the first place is a bad idea, especially considering that this is one of their most highly-touted features. Of course, that's not all that unusual these days, sadly.
  • TalentSpring (my company), JobFox, and ItzBig are three companies working on making hiring more efficient. Now NotchUp is also doing some interesting things in this space.

    The first three are working on advanced ways to job seekers to their ideal job opening. And employers to their ideal job candidate.

    TalentSpring goes beyond that to rank resumes within an industry. We do this to benefit Job Seekers by getting the attention of employees. Job seekers rank well in areas they are passionate about and where they have invested in their work experience and education.

    Since job seekers will rank well in areas they are interested in, we can bring large numbers of employers back to that job seeker. Specifically, we email a wide range of employers of job types that the job seeker considers ideal. This way the job seeker wins because they have their ideal types of employers actively listening to them. (Ranking resumes gives us the power to accomplish this)

    Bryan Starbuck
    CEO
    www.TalentSpring.com
  • Brendan
    I have been looking to switch positions. I have a resume on all the websites and all I get is constant spam from recruiters even though I have checked direct employers only. Time will tell if NotchUp is any better or if it will be more of the same. Just like an employer wants to interview serious candidates, I like the model of employers paying a potential candidate to interview. It means they are serious about hiring and not just interviewing people and wasting your time. It is easy to show up with your "A" game when you are getting paid to interview.
  • My company, Leapways.com (http://www.leapways.com), is also focusing on Job and career market. The main difference we have from others is that it is 100% free of charge for both employers and job seekers.

    We will be soon launching an Interview Service which is aimed at the hiring managers across corporate America. The idea is to take some pressure out of the hiring manager (who's real job is not hiring). We will take the ownership of the filtering the candidates. In other words, our representatives will take the interview and certify a candidate.

    Also, a candidate can take an interview in a technology area and get certified in advance. Those candidates will be listed as "Certified" in their profile.

    Our interviews are real world technical architects, working in IT field for fore than 10 years. That makes a huge difference. "We will help you hire the RIGHT candidate" - That is our motto.

    Regards,
    Rani
    Vice President
    LeapConcepts
  • Yuvraj
    I think Notchup is trying to solve a bog problem in recruiting industry and thats about reaching out to passive job seekers "faster" usually employers waste significant amount of precisous time in reaching out to right candidates by trying to use job boards and otehr obvious sources of hiring. When they fail to get right profiles they go to professional hiring researcher and head hunters. Now headhunters will definately charge you significantly more (aroun 10-25%) of annual base package. If Notchup can get you some passive job seekers who fit in your position and can help you save significant time and money it makes a big sense. But.....how will they ensure that the recruiter who is using their wesite does not head hunt the candidate directly
  • Carter
    Well, competition is inevitable. Although, since these guys are launching so soon after NotchUp’s big splash, I would guess they’ve been brewing this up for awhile now.
  • The first three are working on advanced ways to job seekers to their ideal job opening. And employers to their ideal job candidate.
    This is good article.
    thank you
  • abercrombie622
    Why tiffany jewellery is your best choice?Compared with other jewellerys,tiffany jewellery have many advantages.
    www.tiffanyjewelleryonsale.co.uk