All quiet on the Yahoo! front, time for alternative ideas

yah1Most reports today indicate that Yahoo! is on the precipice of getting bought by Microsoft. As we speak, board members are said to be meeting to determine the ultimate fate of the company. With realistic alternatives failing to materialize, do they agree to sell to Microsoft or do they try to strike some sort of deal with Google?

And yet, as Kara Swisher points out, this may not be the end at all. In fact, today’s meeting will largely be an over-the-phone meeting setting the stage for the in-person one that should come next Wednesday in Sunnyvale. Even at that meeting it’s no sure bet that a decision will be made as to what to do with the company.

It’s clear that Yahoo! does not want to sell to Microsoft, but seeing as it’s been only one week since the offer went public, Yahoo is simply going to need more time if they hope to find a viable alternative.

Sure the idea of partnering up with Google and handing over certain aspects of their business such as advertising as search (to increase revenue) might sound more attractive than a hostile takeover by Microsoft – but in the long run that could end up hurting Yahoo! even more. Not to mention the fact that the governments of both this country and the European Unions might not look upon a teaming up of Google and Yahoo in those arenas too fondly.

Erick Schonfeld lays out an interesting alternative at TechCrunch. What if Yahoo! opens up its search technology? He argues that by allowing for the creation of open-source search algorithms, Yahoo might still not be better than Google at overall search, but they could probably take them on in niche and highly selective searches. (We’ve previously covered the concept of open search here, when we talked to Marissa Meyer of Google about that company’s efforts in social search.)

Opening up search is an interesting idea and one that somewhat reminds me of the soon-to-be-defunct Netscape. Right before Netscape was acquired by AOL in 1998 they opened up their browser’s source code, making it open source. While it might have not made a lot of sense at the time and little came from it at first, eventually this move led to Firefox. Firefox is of course now a web browsing behemoth raking in the money – its for-profit subsidiary is thought to be earning somewhere between $50-$100 million a year now, simply through Google paying it to be its search engine option of choice.

The question, if such an open source idea were explored, is what would Yahoo! do then? Attempt to buy itself more time and see if the Internet community at large comes to its rescue? Unfortunately there probably isn’t enough time for that and that would be a very hard sell to Yahoo’s board.

For the moment it looks like Yahoo! may have a little bit more time to contemplate its future. Will this also give someone like Google more time to come with a viable solution by way of a 3rd party? Everything should be on the table as the 25th hour approaches.

Next Story: Hollywood meets VC money, both online and offline
Previous Story: UStream.TV looking to raise round, may be getting acquisition offers

Bookmark and Share
Photo of MG Siegler

About the Author, MG Siegler

MG Siegler writes about technology trends and new media for VentureBeat, with a focus on mobile topics, social elements and key news stories. Before that, MG wrote about technology on his blog, ParisLemon. Originally from Ohio, MG attended the University of Michigan where he studied film. He's previously lived in Los Angeles where he worked in Hollywood and in San Diego where he did web development. He now lives in San Francisco.

  • JT
    Yahoo search is dead. The problem is Results are now a commodity. Sure we all switched to Google in 2001-ish when results were everything. But today, can anybody really say that Google consistently provides better results than Yahoo and Ask?

    People should be gearing up for a fresh approach to search. Powerset, for all of its problems, is at least creating real innovation.

    But I think the real Google-killer is the recently launched ManagedQ. They've developed what they're calling a Search Application. The idea is to deliver an interactive application layer that guides you through the Result set. Essentially they're claim is that search today is a database that you can run queries on, and, now, search is ready to evolve an Application layer.


    It looks like they've only been out for a few weeks, and they're far from perfect, but I haven't see anything as promising since Google in 2000.
  • Interesting comment, however has anybody asked the user what they actually want in terms of results ?

    I agree that take the LOGOs of ASK, G and Y, and most users would have NO clue who is providing the better experience or results for most search queries.

    And as a large Search Spend advertiser since 2000, all I give a damn about is that the traffic I buy actually convets providing a suitable ROI, I could't give a damn whether it comes from "MikeMooMoo" or "GooHoo"
  • "can anybody really say that Google consistently provides better results than Yahoo and Ask"

    Yes.
  • Just a question here: Is Yahoo! main source of revenue from their search engine? I was under the belief that it was not. They are still the most visited site on the web, and one of the top brands in the world. Jerry clearly doesn't want to sell. Times are bad for them, but that is the case with every company on occasion.

    Microsoft has never been successful on the web, MSN is constantly in the red, and billions are being wasted there. Does that mean someone should buy Microsoft's web business from them and turn it around? haha no.

    If Microsoft can't succeed there, how will buying Yahoo help?
  • Sarah
    Yahoo really needs to innovate in search to have a chance at staying independent. Everything else is irrelevant. No Google ad deal, AOL combo, etc. will help them. Innovation in search is extremely weak lately, with the shiny star being the new Palo Alto startup ManagedQ. This search application uses an awesome UI and deep NLP to improve Google results. I like this product for, gasp..., a replacement to just using Google. Same results, but with a better experience. Check them out.... ManagedQ