There’s been a lot of speculation about Live Mesh, Microsoft’s tool for synchronizing data and applications across multiple computers and devices. Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie announced the product in March, but details were pretty sparse. Now the world has its first chance to see Live Mesh at work with the Live Mesh Technology Preview, a very early (i.e., pre-beta test) version of the product.

Sync technology is heating up, because it promises that users can eventually create and access data on any device, anywhere. In just the last couple of months, a bunch of startups — including Syncplicity, Sharpcast and Dropbox — have rolled out their sync products. Still, you’d think that with vast resources and two years of development, Microsoft should blow the little startup fish out of the water. From what I’ve seen, that isn’t the case. Not yet, anyway.

To be clear, I didn’t get to play with the preview itself. Instead, Microsoft gave me an outline of what it’s unveiling today. Basically, this version of Live Mesh works similarly to other sync products. You install it, add devices to the network, then decide which folders will be synced. Whenever you change a folder on one device, it will be updated across your network. There are some other neat features too: a Mesh Bar to keep track of your activity, folders you can sync with your friends, Live Desktop to access your network from a web browser and Live Remote Desktop to control any of the devices in your network remotely.

It sounds like a solid sync offering, and if it were created by a startup, I’d be pretty darn impressed. But there’s nothing here that’s going to take over the world overnight. That’s why Microsoft seems to be emphasizing the idea of Live Mesh as a platform, through which third-party developers can build new applications using Microsoft’s sync technology. Again, that’s not unique to Mesh; Sharpcast, for example, has similar ambitions. (Sharpcast chief executive Gibu Thomas argues that Microsoft is also disadvantaged because it appears to be a wee bit biased towards Windows. After all, to be truly effective, sync should work well across operating systems.)

But Microsoft has the advantage of being, well, Microsoft, so it’s probably safe to say it won’t be overlooked by developers. The company says there are four principles underlying the platform. Services like sync, peer-to-peer communication and membership are the core; those services can be accessed using the same application programming interface; there’s an extendable data model and application makers aren’t limited to a single development model.

At this early stage, it’s hard to say much about the platform. And since that platform looks to be Mesh’s biggest selling point, our outlook hasn’t changed: Wait and see.

Tags:
Trackback URL

2 Trackbacks

  1. Incremental Blogger » Blog Archive » Reading about Live Mesh said:

    [...] on Anthony Ha’s VentureBeat blog, Robert McLaws posted a comment that is along the lines of what I’ve been thinking [...]

  2. Sliverlight + Mesh = Silvermesh? « Tom Altman’s Wedia Conversation said:

    [...] Microsoft unveils Live Mesh, but there are still some holes [via Zemanta] [...]

2 Comments

  1. Robert McLaws said:

    Mesh is based on FeedSync, which is a CreativeCommons-licensed system. While right now it is limited to Windows, the goal is to have clients for other platforms as well.

    While the general concept is “sync”, Mesh is a lot more than just that. Microsoft hinted to that in a blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/livemesh/archive/2008/04/21/live-mesh-as-a-platform.aspx) with the following:

    At the core of Mesh is concept of a customer’s mesh, or collection of devices, applications and data that an individual owns or regularly uses. The Mesh Account Service persists the relationship among these resources and authorizes access to them. **The mesh is the foundation for a model where customers will ultimately license applications to their mesh, as opposed to an instantiation of Windows, Mac or a mobile account or a web site.** Such applications will be seamlessly installed and run from their mesh and application settings persisted across their mesh.

    That is a *HUGE* thing for Microsoft. What if Office was licensed to your Mesh instead of your PC?

    Go read that post some more. I think you’ll find there is a LOT more to it than just a FolderShare clone.

  2. Anthony Ha said:

    Robert-

    Good points. The idea I was trying to get across is that — again, judging from the materials that Microsoft sent me — what’s been unveiled is just a really good sync product, but there’s potential for a lot more. In other words, Live Mesh is pretty promising, but as of this preview it’s still just promise.

    I have to admit, though, that I’m not sure why the idea of licensing application to your mesh is all that exciting either. It’s a cool feature (and I do mention it very, very briefly in the article_), I’m not sure why that’s any more useful than the SaaS version of Office that Microsoft is experimenting with. Maybe I’m just being dense; after all, I haven’t had any coffee yet this morning …

Add a Comment