With new release and new funding, Wetpaint wants to “wikify” the web

updated

Since its launch in 2006, software from a Seattle startup called Wetpaint has been used to build nearly a million wikis where a company’s customers and fans create the content. That’s pretty impressive, but Wetpaint chief executive Ben Elowitz says some companies weren’t satisfied — it would be even better if they didn’t have to create the wiki on a separate site.

Wetpaint addresses that need with its new release, dubbed Wetpaint Injected, which does exactly what the name says — it injects wiki functionality into any webpage. So rather than creating a separate page for, say, a VentureBeat fan community (hey, it could happen), we could allow our readers to update our stories by adding wiki-style entries to the main page. And that, Elowitz says, improves traffic and search engine optimization to our main site, rather than pulling users to another page. (See screenshot of Wetpaint Injected at the game site IGN, below.)


When we wrote about Wetpaint more than a year ago, we were most impressed with its convenience — it was just really easy to set up a new wiki. The company has carried that approach over to its new product; Elowitz says the new functions can be added by just pasting a short snippet of code to a webpage. At the same time, the user-generated content’s look and format is customizable and should blend in with the rest of the page.

This is a smart move, and should further help Wetpaint stand out from competitors like PBWiki. As more and more sites add features — wikis, comments, polls — that allow them to interact with their readers, it makes sense to integrate those features as directly into the main browsing experience as possible. And the ability to add wiki capabilities to any page with just a few lines of code is totally unique, Elowitz says.

Companies should also be attracted by the fact that the feature is free for up to 100,000 impressions per month, and then charges based on a revenue-sharing model.

Elowitz says Wetpaint’s approach has already started paying off, with 925,000 websites built on the company’s platform and 20 percent growth in recent months. But he also says it’s time for the company to start growing more aggressively, which is why he’s raised a $25 million third round of funding, bringing Wetpaint’s total financing to $40 million. That’s a hefty sum, particularly when you recall that we were already startled by the size of Wetpaint’s $9.5 million second round. But Elowitz says the funding matches the company’s ambitious plans to “wikify” every page on the web.

The round was led by DAG Ventures and an undisclosed investor, with participation from existing backers Accel Partners, Trinity Ventures and Frazier Technology Ventures.

Update: Kara Swisher reports on yet another investor, Fidelity Investments (perhaps that “undisclosed” lead investor that Wetpaint mentioned?). Fidelity is the same major institutional backer that invested big bucks into Slide. And in the comments below, PBWiki’s Chris Yeh notes that his startup offers a similar feature, but hasn’t emphasized it.

Next Story: Online billing company Aria Systems gets funding from industry vet
Previous Story: AMD launches “Good Housekeeping” stamp of approval for gaming computers

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • This looks interesting...bringing wiki to the masses without re-building the actual websites. Economical for many people, I guess.
  • There are many open source solutions that are easy to use and that are free and much more customizable.
  • Care to name a few? None of the startups I looked at seemed to offer similar functionality, but I'm not an expert in this field, which is why I noted that the uniqueness Elowitz's claim. If there are any glaring omissions, I'd be happy to update the article to include them. Thanks.
  • One important fact:

    PBwiki has offered the ability to wikify web pages with embedded wiki functionality for over a year. As our founder and CEO David Weekly noted in March:

    "PBwiki can let you inline both private and public data server-side as well with just a line or two of PHP. Check “Server-Side Inlining” at the bottom of http://api.pbwiki.com/

    PBwiki still takes care of hosting the data and the editor; particularly useful if you’re just server-side republishing one or two pages of an otherwise very private wiki and you don’t need to worry about accidental exposure. But you get the SEO benefit of having the content inline. (To be clear, this is not a new feature announcement - this has all been working for well over a year.)"

    It's not surprising that this fact was overlooked, however. PBwiki hasn't made its wikilet functionality a major emphasis. I suspect that this reflects the different focuses of the two companies. Wetpaint is focused on public collaboration, mainly for consumer-facing sites and wikis; PBwiki is focused on private collaboration, mainly for internal business processes.

    I think Wetpaint injected is a good idea (after all, I came up with PBwiki's wikilet concept a couple of years back, while I was still just an investor in the company), and hope that it helps spread wikification further into the mainstream.
  • Thanks, I've updated to point this out.