MobileBeat 2008: VCs to developers — The iPhone is great, but hedge your bets

Mobile investment was the official topic for the panel of venture capitalists at today’s MobileBeat conference in Sunnyvale, but the discussion focused on a more specific, sexy topic — Apple’s iPhone 3G, and especially its App Store.

Some of the attention came just because the App Store is the hot new thing right now. It launched earlier this month, and VentureBeat writer MG Siegler described it as “sublime beyond belief.” It has captured people’s imaginations, and is bringing a lot more attention to the mobile space. With all the interest, and with a better revenue-sharing deal (Apple normally gets 30 percent, compared to 40 or 50 percent for most carrier deals, according to Menlo Ventures’ Shawn Carolan) the iPhone is pretty tempting for app developers.

But the panelists didn’t just sing hosannas to Apple. For one thing, Rich Wong of Accel Partners noted that even if the store is an improvement on the old carrier-reliant model, it’s hardly an open environment.

“Well, Apple is a walled garden,” he said. “It’s just a different form of walled garden. … Hopefully it’s a more benevolent one.”

Even Rupert Young, who handles strategic investment at AT&T (which, remember, is the only network in the U.S. that carries the iPhone), noted that the App Store isn’t a boon for all developers. Once you leave the rarefied realm of the most popular applications and get down to, say, the 50th most downloaded app, “The numbers start to get small very quickly.”

Several speakers emphasized that despite the buzz it’s getting now, focusing exclusively on the iPhone would be a mistake. Wong, for example, said he wants startups to at least “intelligently hedge their bets across multiple platforms.”

It wasn’t all about the iPhone, even if it sometimes felt that way. The VCs also offered general tips about the applications and startups that they look to invest in. One piece of advice: Don’t try to try to compete with the big players by just creating a mobile copy of their sites. Instead, look for new needs that a mobile app can address.

“If you want to allow someone to keep track of friends’ lives and message with them and you just want to do that on mobile [competing with Facebook] — don’t,” Carolan said. “It’ll just be a complete waste of time.”

Next Story: Loopt strikes a deal to make massive use of GPS data cost effective
Previous Story: Yahoo-owned Zimbra moves against Outlook with its own desktop email client

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , ,

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • AT&T's comment is easy to understand: with no control over the App Store, they can't get their piece of the mobile application/service revenues. But, as far as I know, there's already more applications on the App Store than any mobile carrier would select. Since choices is what people want, the App Store is already an interesting use case.
  • Hmm, you might have something there. But AT&T still benefits from sales of the iPhone, and the App Store is one of the most exciting things about the iPhone. So it's not in AT&T's interest to slag it.
  • jeff
    It is quite interesting that in an earlier panel, the two european operators did not obssess on the iphone - Is this a u.s or silicon valley phenomenon? It was refreshing to hear from Orange that they will not squash new application delivery models but will compete based on natural advantages.