Debix tries to broaden the reach of its smart identity theft service

Debix is one of the smartest services I’ve ever seen to combat identity theft. It can stop the theft of your identity as it happens. Today, the company is slicing its prices so that a single consumer can protect himself or herself against identity theft for $24 a year.

Debix operates an efficient electronic network that is built on the premise that while a thief can convince an institution that he is you, the thief cannot convince you that he is you. Debix provides a secure and automated phone call requesting authorization and the consumer says whether the transaction is legitimate. It verifies through your phone number and your voice whether the person being called is actually you. It can check your voice against a recording of your voice that you make when you open a Debix account.

“We think a lot of snake oil has been sold in this space,” said Bo Holland, chief executive of Debix. “We can stop fraud because we come at it from a technical and common sense point of view.”

More than half of identity theft victims reported in 2007 that their personal information had been used to start a new line of credit in their name, according to the nonprofit Identity Theft Resource Center, which provides victim support and public education about identity theft. Jay Foley, the ITRC’s executive director seems to be a personal fan of the service. “Bo has been talking to me since he came up with the technology,” he said. “It exceeds my expectations. No one else has stepped up to the plate.”

Debix’s identity protection network has been operating since January 2007. Since then, more than 400,000 paying consumers have used it and it has stopped more than 1,400 identity theft attacks, saving $9.3 million in losses, Holland said. In the fourth quarter of 2007, Debix monitored 30,000 requests for new accounts. It found 380 were frauds. Of those attacks, not a single one was successful.

If Debix detects an attack, it immediately turns the call over to one of its investigators, who collects the facts and engages law enforcement while the case is still hot.

Debix previously charged $100 a year. The company has a test drive program that users can take to understand how it works.

Under the new pricing, individuals can get Debix Identity Protection for $24 per year and families can buy Debix for less than $12 per person per year.  Small families with one adult and up to four children living in the same household costs $48 per year. Large families with up to five adults and ten children cost $144 per year.

The company was founded in 2004. It hasn’t spent any money on advertising during the 19 months the service has been available. It raised $9.3 million in May from Merus Capital and Trellis Partners. Last year, the company raised money from angels Gideon Yu, the current chief financial officer at Facebook, and Launny Steffens, a former vice chairman of Merrill Lynch & Co.

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , ,

Photo of Dean Takahashi

About the Author, Dean Takahashi

Dean Takahashi is lead writer for GamesBeat at VentureBeat. He covers video games, security, chips and a variety of other subjects. He previously worked at the San Jose Mercury News, the Wall Street Journal, the Red Herring, the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register and the Dallas Times Herald. He is the author of two books, Opening the Xbox and the Xbox 360 Uncloaked.

  • William
    Hmmm... 400,000 paying consumers * $100 = $40m. (More, presumably, in that they've been open more than a year.) However, they've only stopped $9.3 million in losses. Net loss to their customers from signing up with Debix: $30.7m.

    Of course, insurance generally costs more than the aggregate losses, so Debix isn't necessarily a bad deal compared with other things people do. And avoiding the pain is certainly worth something. But still...
  • Yet another post from someone who performs calculations with no rhyme or reason. William, all of your mathematical presumptions are grossly inaccurate. Please be familiar with the available research data and have your math in order before posting. According to the ITRC, the average monetary loss to a consumer who falls victim to identity theft is approximately $7,000. For the 1,330 reported identity theft attacks Debix has stopped as of 6/08, they prevented $9.3M in losses. I have yet to see any other organization within the identity theft/data breach space provide hard data which proves their product or service works.
  • They also got most of their customers through large data breaches, meaning they did not receive the full $89 (with discount) as deals were cut. This is a very cheap offer for those who don't want the hassle of dealing with fraud alerts by themselves.
  • Han
    Looks Like a desperation move going that cheap. I need to feel like there's going to be an actual responsible person on staff to make sure my credit reports are put through.
  • Tim
    I tried the service and it works out pretty well. No hassle calling each credit bureau to place your fraud alert. When you open new credit card account (or some other type of financial accounts - I haven't tried out), the system will call you to confirm your identity before approve. Personally, I also heard of the case where their internal private investigator goes after a id thief to prosecute him for a customer, when that guy tries to open a car loan using her identity. Prevention works much better than recovery if you ask me.
  • Dieter
    Interestingly, Dempsey is the son of Neal Dempsey who owns Bay Partners and who was board of directors and major stok holder in Broacde. If we all remember correctly,
    Gregory Reyes is the former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Brocade Communications Systems. On August 11, 2007 he was convicted on 10 counts of illegally backdating stock options while serving as CEO of Brocade.[1] In January 2008, he was sentenced to 21 months in prison and received a $15 million fine.[2] U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, the sentencing judge, refused to grant the defense request for a sentence of no more than 13 months, to be served in a halfway house rather than prison. Breyer did, however, grant the request to allow Reyes to remain free on bail pending his appeal.[3] As of December 2008[update], the United States Federal Bureau of Prisons indicates that Reyes is not in custody.

    In September 2008, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers announced that it was filing an amicus brief in Reyes appeal, urging reversal.

    In addition to the criminal proceeding, Reyes has also been named in several civil lawsuits in state and federal courts, stemming from the backdating, including one federal suit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Federal Court has ordered notice be given to those who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. ("Brocade") between May 18, 2000 and May 15, 2005, informing them that a class has been certified and that a settlement of $160,098,500 has been proposed. This settlement will be comprised of the following payments: (i) $160,000,000 by defendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. ("Brocade") and (ii) $98,500 by defendant KPMG LLP ("KPMG," and collectively with Brocade, the "Settling Defendants"). A hearing will be held before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, U.S. Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 19th Floor, Courtroom 8, San Francisco, CA 94102 at 10:00 a.m., on January 23, 2009 to determine whether: (1) the proposed settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Class; (2) Class Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses and Class Representatives' application for reimbursement of costs and expenses should be approved; (3) the Court should dismiss with prejudice and release all claims against the Settling Defendants and current and former Brocade officers and directors Gregory Reyes, Antonio Canova, Larry Sonsini, Seth Neiman, and Neal Dempsey relating to the conduct alleged in this case; and (4) the Court should rule on such other matters as the Court deems appropriate. If approved, the Settlement will resolve all claims in this litigation as further described in the full printed Notice of Class Action, Proposed Settlement, Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Fairness Hearing (the "Notice"). Members of the class described above may be entitled to share in the settlement fund and their rights will be affected whether they act or not.
  • Ron
    I'm sure Dempsey and Greg Reyes have enough money to bribe judges and lawyers and get themselves a get out of jail free card.... I wonder why they haven't got the rock pile just yet? Probably because they lied their way out of the can!