AOL shutters Tacoda, forces customers into low-end Ad.com

Tacoda, the well-known ad network company which offers relatively high rates to publishers to place advertisements automatically on their Web pages, is officially shutting down.

The entity, recently bought by AOL, is instead being folded into AOL’s Ad.com/Platform A division. This is a shocking move for some, because Ad.com doesn’t target much at all, and offers ads of $1 or less per a thousand views — and is generally considered a “bottom-feeder” by some in the industry. The company apparently hasn’t communicated very well about what sort of targeting technology Ad.com will offer to the affected customers (see memo below).

[Update: We found it difficult Friday to reach someone at AOL for comment, but PaidContent's David Kaplan has reached Platform A's Lynda Clarizo, and she says Ad.com will be using Tacoda's technology. She says Ad.com was targeting the same way Tacoda was, and thus the implication is that Ad.com was paying as much. But that's not what we've heard from sources. Only time will tell.]

Tacoda became popular because it offered an industry high rate of $2 to $6 per a thousand views (CPM). True, other advertisers often offer far more than that, but not without selling to a Web publisher’s more expensive display ad space — and requiring interactions with live sales people. Tacoda, all automated, paid rates well above other comparable “remnant” networks. It did so by working hard to target behavior of Web users. By knowing what pages users visited online, Tacoda’s technology allowed advertisers to fork out more money, in the knowledge that their ads were reaching the right people.

Valueclick, another player in the area that is similar to Ad.com, announced anemic flat growth yesterday, its shares fell by up to 11 percent as it became clear customers are spending less. Aside from the economic downturn, the pressure may also be due to the realization that low-end ad networks don’t offer a very differentiated product anymore.

The shuttering of Tacoda comes after another move by AOL that raised eyebrows: AOL bought Bebo $850 million, a price many observers considered to be twice or three times what it was really worth, and then let the founder Michael Birch leave — though some considered him one of the company’s crown jewels.

The action is also significant because AOL has been the second largest online advertising player, behind Google.

From what we hear, the Tacoda transition isn’t going very smoothly. Only 35 employees remain at Tacoda’s division, down from 97, apparently because some sales people were unhappy about moving to Ad.com. A letter sent out by Tacoda today suggests publishers will have to sign new contracts, and will have to change tags on their web pages. Letter below.

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , ,

Photo of Matt Marshall

About the Author, Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall is editor and CEO of VentureBeat.

  • Remote Control
    From the moment they bought Tacoda, Linda Clarizio was unhappy. Unhappy not to be made the boss of Platform A, afraid that Bewkes liked Viebranz more than her (he did and does) and almost crapped in her shorts when the suggestion was made to dump Ad.com because of its low rates. Now that she has killed Tacoda (and all of the people who came with it) she should be much happier (and the TW shareholders much sader).
  • Well, I guess this explains why Dave Morgan didn't feel compelled to respond to my "I Will Smack the Next Person That Calls Behavioral Targeting Creepy" post last week.

    So long, and better luck in your next contradictory venture, guys.
  • bill finerman
    um, you may have jumped the gun, dude. check out the excellent piece on paid content. they actually tracked down clarizio.
  • Henry Spitzer
    Well, here's another $275M AOL Genius management has flushed down the sh#*tter. Every week that goes by gives more evidence Clarizio, Grant and Falco are clueless. Is there ANY doubt that Bewkes is still blind with rage over the inane AOL-TW merger of 2000? His Henny Youngman's "Take my wife....PLEASE" version with AOL is another example of throwing out the baby with the bath water. Bewkes will probably pay Earthlink to take the dial-up business and whatever deal they make for the rest of AOL will look like the deals the banks have been making to unload their bad mortgage paper....25 cents on the dollar. How much was AOL valued at the time of the merger compared to the sub $10B they HOPE to get today? Can anyone total up the the combined losses of shareholder value due to T-W incompetent management since 2000? How much did they write off/down, pay in SEC fines? How about all the businesses they have bought and TANKED...such as Netscape (remember when they had 80% of the browser market?), and recently Third Screen, Tacoda, Userplane, Bebo....their corporate failure list reads like the rap sheet of a career criminal!