If I were to take a poll of everyone I’ve talked to about the iPhone, my guess is that most would say its biggest problem is not related to the device or even Apple at all, but rather its carrier: AT&T. While I personally have never had a problem with the carrier, a lot of people out there seem to rabidly dislike the company’s cellular offering. For those people I have some very bad news: AT&T has apparently extended its exclusive deal to be the American carrier of the iPhone for another year — until 2010.
The extension came when AT&T offered to pay Apple a subsidy on each iPhone sold rather than give it a percentage cut from all contracts, according the USA Today. This subsidy is said to be somewhere around $300 per phone sold. Previous reports had it in the $325 to $425 range depending on the model.
The report also claims that under the first deal it signed with AT&T, the exclusivity agreement would have ended at the end of this year. (Other reports previously had it being a five year deal.) That would have allowed Apple to sell iPhones on carriers such as Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile in the United States. This is something many people in this country have been clamoring for.
CNET’s Don Reisinger thinks this is an awful move:
Apple’s decision to stay in this deal with AT&T not only makes me wonder if Steve Jobs is thinking clearly, but it also solidifies my belief that Apple has a little too much faith in its product.
While I don’t think Apple has little faith in its product, I do think this is a poor decision. The iPhone has a chance to become not only the dominant smartphone for the coming years, but also the first real powerhouse in mobile computing. By limiting the device to one carrier, it limits its potential to reach such goals.
As I said, I haven’t had any problems with AT&T, but many people, for a number of reasons, will not buy an iPhone simply because it is on AT&T. Is a $300 to $400 subsidy really worth aleinating potential customers? Maybe short term, but long term?
Is Apple mortgaging its future by extending this deal?
[photo: flickr/bluemodern]
3:55 pm
AT&T iPhone deal extended to 2010. Did Apple mortgage its future … said:
[...] Corn Chips wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIf I were to take a poll of everyone I’ve talked to about the iPhone, my guess is that most would say its biggest problem is not related to the device or even Apple at all, but rather its carrier: AT&T. While I personally have never had … [...]
3:59 pm
AT&T iPhone deal extended to 2010. Did Apple mortgage its future … said:
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
7:45 pm
Bryan Murley » Why I won’t be buying an iPhone for two more years said:
[...] AT&T; iPhone deal extended to 2010. Did Apple mortgage its future for a subsidy? This entry was written by bryan, posted on August 2, 2008 at 2:45 am, filed under Life __(and tagged) Apple, AT&T, iPhone, iphone 3g, IPod touch, Randall Stephenson. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « AEJMC next week [...]
8:25 pm
AT&T iPhone deal extended to 2010. Did Apple mortgage its future … said:
[...] Go to the author’s original blog: AT&T iPhone deal extended to 2010. Did Apple mortgage its future … [...]
8:54 pm
» AT&T iPhone deal extended to 2010. Did Apple mortgage its future … - Mac Life said:
[...] Apple news by MG Siegler [...]
9:35 am
BroadDev - Unified Communications, Virtualization, Security, and Web 2.0 » AT&T Says WiMax is Their Future for Broadband - We Need WiMax to Work Please said:
[...] of AT&T is wireless. Blog posts are coming out on the topic here and here. However what about other wireless opportunities like WiMax. Is AT&T [...]
6:41 am
AT&T monopoly till 2010 | iPhone Footprint said:
[...] CNET’s Don Reisinger says: [...]
11:52 am
Apple’s iPhone 3G connection problems don’t appear to be Apple’s problems » VentureBeat said:
[...] course, that would probably lead to more outrage about Apple being exclusively tied to AT&T in the U.S., a deal which was recently extended through 201…. The pact may make sense for some technical reasons — Apple doesn’t, for example, have [...]