Palo Alto Networks raises $27 million for next-generation firewalls

Palo Alto Networks is announcing today it has raised $27 million in a third round of funding for its firewall appliance business.

Lehman Brothers Venture Partners led the round while other investors included Globespan Capital Partners, Greylock Partners, and Sequoia Capital. The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company will use the money to expand its sales, marketing and customer services functions in North America as well as extend its business into Europe and Asia.

The size of the round is large for a security company that is competing with some big rivals. But the company solves problems that the others don’t and it has some well-known backers. In security, a business built on trust, the clout of the backers and the company’s newly appointed CEO, who has a wealth of experience in security technology, should help Palo Alto Networks garner more momentum.

The firewalls of the past have been designed to stop threats coming in from emails and web sites. But as employees adopt new web-based services — instant messaging, Skype, and Salesforce.com — they open up the networks to new threats. That’s where Palo Alto Networks’ firewall appliances come in, said Lane Bess, chief executive of Palo Alto Networks.

“We can monitor what the employees are using on the web,” he said.

Instead of offering generic firewall protection, Palo Alto Networks’ PA-4000 family of products can set corporate firewall protocols on more granular levels so that each user has a distinct set of permissions on a network. As a tool, it gives network administrators more control of their networks by letting them see all applications on a network.

The hardware devices have enough speed to filter the traffic without slowing down a network. They range in price from $12,000 to $80,000. It lets IT managers detect which users are installing unauthorized or personal applications on their work machines. Competing products often don’t give detailed information that can help IT managers make quick decisions about what users are allowed or not allowed to do.

Bess joined the company at the end of June. He has 25 years of experience in sales and marketing roles and was mostly recently executive vice president for global sales at antivirus software vendor Trend Micro. During his years there, he helped the company cross a billion dollars in sales. Palo Alto Networks was was founded in 2005 and has raised about $55 million to date.

Competitors include Juniper Networks, CheckPoint Security Technologies and Cisco. These incumbents are well established in corporate networks. But Bess said that he doesn’t ask CIOs to rip out firewalls that they’ve invested millions of dollars into. The PA-4000 family sits alongside existing firewalls and provides added protection without requiring a company to build an entirely new network.

Next Story: Google’s Android phone, the HTC Dream, is apparently approved by FCC — Nov. 10 is the latest release date
Previous Story: Subpoenaed documents at TheFunded reveal more negative commentary about EDF Ventures

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , ,

Photo of Dean Takahashi

About the Author, Dean Takahashi

Dean is lead writer for GamesBeat at VentureBeat. He covers video games, security, chips and a variety of other subjects. Dean previously worked at the San Jose Mercury News, the Wall Street Journal, the Red Herring, the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register and the Dallas Times Herald. He is the author of two books, Opening the Xbox and the Xbox 360 Uncloaked. Follow him on Twitter at @deantak, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • Is Salesforce.com the new ADP ... or the next Datapoint?
    What will happen if blue sky clears the cloud?

    ***

    This headline recently appeared in several places across the Web:

    "Salesforce.com Passes $1 Billion Annual Revenue Mark"

    THIS IS NOT TRUE. I don't know whether this material misstatement arose from media manipulation or an honest mistake, but it's genesis is most likely this 20 August 2008 press release...

    "Salesforce.com Announces Record Fiscal Second Quarter Results"
    http://tinyurl.com/5m5mea

    ...the subheading of which claims:

    "First Ever Software as a Service Company to Exceed $1 Billion Annual Revenue Run Rate"

    THIS IS NOT TRUE, EITHER. "Software as a Service" is marketing technospin for "service bureau". And payroll processing giant ADP--another service bureau--exceeded not only a "run rate" but actual annual revenues of $1 billion in 1985:

    "The original outsourcer, Automatic Data Processing..."
    http://tinyurl.com/56y5tx

    Yes, SalesForce.com did report revenues of $263 million for their most recent quarter. And yes, they have raised "FY09 Revenue Guidance to $1.070 - $1.075 Billion". But NO, Salesforce.com has NOT passed the "$1 Billion Annual Revenue Mark". And despite Cheerleader/CEO Marc Benioff's effusive exuberance, some like Tiernan Ray do not share his enthusiasm:

    "Salesforce's Deferred Revenue Debacle"
    http://tinyurl.com/6oagtp

    Perhaps in an effort to meet ever-inflating investor expectations--a fire they themselves have fueled--Mr. Ray notes that Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Nemeroff "...thinks Salesforce may be pushing customers to sign more multi-year subscription contracts by lower prices, which could be hitting deferred revenue." And reading that, for me, brought on a disturbing case of Datapoint deja vu:

    http://tinyurl.com/gk77r

    "By the early 1980s, Datapoint was a Fortune 500 company. Under immense pressure to increase sales figures, its sales representatives encouraged customers to place large orders at the end of the fiscal year, permitting the company to count the orders as revenue even though the money had not been received and, in some instances, the sold equipment had not yet even been produced.... When some of the customers went broke before paying their bills, Datapoint had to reverse sales or record substantial bad debts, which caused the company to lose $800 million of its market capitalization in a matter of a few months in early 1982. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ordered Datapoint to stop this practice."

    Is Salesforce.com the new ADP ... or the next Datapoint? Some say their business model is to take your watch and then bill you for the time. If so, what will happen to all those watches if blue sky clears the cloud?

    Bruce Arnold, Web Design Miami Florida
    http://www.PervasivePersuasion.com