Will Windows Live become the Vista of social networks?

Microsoft is launching “Wave 3″ of Windows Live, which includes a bunch of new features to turn Live into more of social networking site. From what I saw at last night’s press preview, I won’t be giving up my Facebook account anytime soon, but it looks pretty slick. More importantly, it’s hard to deny the potential of tapping into the hundreds of millions of users already on Microsoft Hotmail and Messenger.

The problem, Microsoft says, is that people have so many online accounts, be it for social networking, email, instant messaging or whatever — why not make Windows Live the hub for all of that? Most significantly, that means taking the social networking components that already existed within Windows Live Spaces and moving them front and center. So now users have a profile that’s updated with activity from all the various Live services, as well as a news feed that lets them keep track of what their friends are up to. The rest of Live will also be seeded with more social features — Messenger, for example, now has a “what’s new” area that’s basically a news feed of friends’ activity within the instant messaging service.

Live is also opening itself up for outside sites to publish activity to a user’s feed, kind of like Facebook’s controversial Beacon, but crucially users must opt-in before extra information gets displayed. Launch partners include Daum, Flickr, Flixster, iLike, Pandora, Photobucket, StumbleUpon, TripIt, Twitter, WordPress and Yelp.

I’m skeptical that Windows Live can get serious play as a social network against MySpace and Facebook this late in the game. Sure, all the new features are nice, and linking the Live services together makes for a more compelling social network than Windows Live Spaces alone. (I’d barely even heard of Spaces before this, and I don’t know anyone who uses it.) But I don’t see anything here to make anyone switch over from the big existing networks, or to tempt them to add yet another social network account — isn’t that the problem Microsoft is supposed to be addressing? And given Microsoft’s strategic investment in Facebook last year, I’m not sure if it wants to taking Facebook on directly.

It’s hard not to see this as a rather stale “me too” move. It even comes on the heels of Yahoo’s effort to integrate its services into a social networking platform. And in Yahoo’s case, there’s an emphasis on building a platform for third-party developers. Microsoft is also opening up to third parties, but the emphasis in the press materials, at least, is more, “Hey, we have a social network, too!”

I’m guessing the audience for these new features will fall into two camps: People already in a social network who don’t see this as a replacement, but as a way to better connect and “socialize” the Live services they use; and the folks who haven’t really dived in to social networking yet, and want to dip their toe in with “social networking lite.” This certainly won’t get much play among all the social media addicts in Silicon Valley — but as the Microsoft folks kept telling me last night, Silicon Valley isn’t like the rest of the world.

Next Story: PhoneTopp extends web conferencing to the iPhone
Previous Story: Microsoft-backed Sabi launches cool drawing game for kids

Bookmark and Share
Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • SEO Expert Inc.
    It seems like MSFT is always arriving late to the game, rather than being the ones who started the game. It's as if one of their core strategies is now "copying" what other companies are successful at.

    Facebook is successful at social networking because they focused on that business, and put 100% of their efforts into it. It sounds great on paper to reduce the number of user accounts required to use the various sites out there, but it's just a part of internet life that people have grown to accept.
  • chicken
    Microsoft has had a collection of services for a decade or so (Hotmail, Messenger, Search etc) -- long before Facebook. It's trying to turn them into a more coherent platform, but it has been doing that for a while (Passport, Hailstorm, Spaces....).

    Otherwise, Google's core strategy is also "copying" what other companies are successful at (or buying them - Blogger, Picasa, Keyhole etc). Yahoo's core strategy is also "copying" what other companies are successful at (or buying them - eGroups, Flickr etc). Perhaps you should find a more useful way of satisfying your need to sneer at Microsoft?
  • I'm not familiar enough with Microsoft's history to have a thoughtful experience on the broader pattern you guys are arguing about, but I am curious what you thik of this specific announcement, uh, "chicken". I agree that Microsoft is just building on existing services, but I also have a hard time seeing this catching on in a big way.
  • This is great...All we need are more closed source giants (Goolge, MicroSoft, Facebook, MySpace) creating new ways to make billions on the backs of members/content creators and developers.

    Free your mind and the Rest will follow

    Some things about www.adelph.us

    1. You are not a share cropper- Break the chains
    2. Be a rebel
    3. Change the game
    4. Believe in the possibilities
    5. Do good


    At adelph.us "Open" means :

    1. Whenever possible using Open Source applications
    2. Whenever possible offering the hosted use of applications free of charge to members
    3. Always writing code using existing Open Source standards that are not proprietary or owned by a company ie (Face Book and the rest)
    4. Empowering the community (Individuals, Groups, Non Profits, and Companies) with tools that help them to save time and resources
    5. Evening the playing field
    6. Giving back to the community
    7. Giving back to Open Source
    8. You control all access of your account
    9. You control all access to your content
  • Ike
    Shut the fuck up you spammer
  • Yeah, I don't have a huge problem with people mentioning their sites if it's relevant to the post, but would definitely prefer that you didn't give us the full pitch; it just takes up so much space. Thanks!
  • A Tad too Late IMO ...
    http://tinyurl.com/67evwp
  • A Tad too Late IMO ...
    http://tinyurl.com/67evwp
  • A Tad too Late IMO ...
    http://tinyurl.com/67evwp
  • edhardy622
    British law student sues Abercrombie-Fitch for disability discrimination.
    http://www.abercrombiefitchstore.co.uk