The art of the bootstrap

[Editor's note: With the economic downturn drying up venture capital in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, more early-stage companies will be forced to bootstrap their way to profitability. But what does that actually mean for the companies who go this route? Javier Rojas, managing director of equity capital firm Kennet Partners, offers his insights.]

Times being what they are, it’s encouraging to know that some of the world’s leading public companies got to where they are without taking any early venture capital funding. That’s right, Microsoft, Dell, Cisco, Oracle, eBay — they all “bootstrapped” it.

Others, like Siebel Systems, Checkpoint Software, Broadcom and dozens of others, have followed their examples to success. The early years may have been challenging for the new execs forced to turn down paychecks. But they kept the faith that focusing more on customers and real revenues than market sizing and early valuations would someday pay off.

There are many compelling reasons for young companies seeking venture capital to turn to bootstrapping, even when they have other options. Not only might it be a safer way to go today, but it’s also a smart way to build a business.

How it works

When you decide to bootstrap, you commit to fund primary development and growth through internal cash flow from real-life customers. You — the founder — and a limited number of early employees may forgo paychecks for quite some time to make this work. But to keep that strategy to a minimum, it’s common for bootstrapping companies to turn to consulting engagements, non-recurring engineering contracts, value-added reseller agreements and projected supplier contracts. In short, “moonlighting.” These funds go toward initial growth and expansion until the company can stand on its own two feet.

A solid foundation

Opting to be self-sufficient (either voluntarily or not) and rely on real revenue means one thing: The customer is suddenly king. This focus becomes baked into the company’s DNA. Its very survival depends on developing products that its target market actually wants and likes. Customers are often involved in beta testing and are encouraged to become involved in the process. And early on is the time when you want to solidify a customer base for future sustainability.

Bootstrapping companies can also be more rational and less speculative with their allocation of resources. Because they can’t afford to throw money at problems, they have real incentive to solve potentially destabilizing conflicts and errors before they become systemic.

How much bootstrapping is enough?

Raising the right money at the right time can make or break a company’s growth, so it’s important to know when your company has outgrown its boots. Here are some indicators:

- Market growth rate is accelerating: If the market is growing faster than your internal funding, you risk losing market share (and equity) by not catching up.

- Customers are buying products and sales are predictable: You can scale your sales team, and more effectively channel the VC money you raise. As a rule of thumb, you should feel confident that you can predictably bring in at least $2 in gross profit for every $1 you spend on sales and marketing. I recommend a $3 to $1 ration as an even safer barometer.

- Complementary products or businesses have become available: It may be time to expand your offerings through an acquisition. Can you economically acquire new customers through a merger? If you are considering M & A activity and need help financing your growth, it’s time to raise capital.

- The current economic cycle favors growth: This isn’t what we’re experiencing now, of course, but hopefully it won’t be too far off. If the market seems to favor technology investment, or you see new growth areas on the horizon, it could be wise to switch.

- Your balance sheets are weak, or you want to diversify risk: Co-mingled balance sheets can be a major challenge for bootstrapping businesses. A prudent decision for a company may be imprudent for its founder (scaling sales at the expense of cash-flow, for example). As a consolation, selling off some shares can let founders offload some risk as well.

Where do you go from here?

If you’ve bootstrapped long enough to face these issues, you’ve probably done a pretty good job establishing growth and maintaining an equitable personal stake. Now the question becomes, “What do I look for in an investor?”

My advice: Don’t just look for the money — look for a partner with vested equity interest to help you expand. After this point, many parts of your business and how you manage them will need to change. Your investment partner should offer substantial contributions in this direction, not just capital.

A disclaimer: Bootstrapping is not for everyone

Some startups don’t even have the luxury of bootstrapping. Their markets might require immediate action, and they don’t have three to four years to foster growth. Their concepts may be capital intensive, requiring funding from the beginning. And in some cases, founders simply can’t invest “sweat equity” in their businesses by waiving months of pay. Bootstrapping is only for the entrepreneur who has the time and wherewithal to heed all of these factors. But for those who do pursue it, it can lead to a great company and even greater financial rewards.

Javier Rojas is managing director of Silicon Valley-based Kennet Partners, which provides growth equity capital to bootstrapped companies in the U.S. and Europe. Kennet targets capital-efficient businesses with annual revenues of $5 million to $50 million.

Next Story: MySpace application helps Blackberry phones get more social
Previous Story: Kids on the internet: Approved by the MacArthur Foundation

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Photo of Javier Rojas

About the Author, Javier Rojas

Javier is a managing director leading U.S. investment activities for Kennet Partners. He is currently on the boards of NetPro Computing, MedeFinance, Kapow Technologies, and eProject. Javier holds an M.B.A. from The Harvard Business School and a B.A.S. from Georgetown University.

  • Speaking of DNA my company is actually called DNA 11 and believe it or not our business consists of taking your DNA and turning it into art. We are a perfect example of a company that has grown from a typical "bootstrap" strategy. We are very market focused and we serve a niche market with direct (web sales)- we started with $2000 and to this date we have not even taken a loan. In less than three years we have generated millions in revenue in over 50 countries- and we're profitable. Bootstrapping is the way to go if you can pull it off. Check out www.dna11.com if you are curious. Great article.
  • There should be some sort of Gold Medal for Bootstrapping!!! If you can get a bunch of people to drink the Kool Aid with you there should be some sort of prize (well, other than being able to catch the mother ship).

    Thoughts from the Bootstrapping Kool Aid Pusher

    Michael Kassing
    MarkTend.com (I am up to 15 waiting for our mother ship)

    psst, hey kid, want to drink?
  • Um, eBay took venture money.
  • Javier Rojas
    Yes but they took money after achieving a $4.5M run rate and were operating breakeven. The risks for the founders in doing this, taking growth capital, is much lower than taking start up capital for those that can doit. As a result, they kept much more ownership.
  • This piece hits home as we've been bootstrapping but have a runaway market (social media monitoring) that requires us to ramp up sales ASAP. So we're now raising money while still working to build revenue on our own dime. Bootstrapping a business that has slow but steady growth is fine but a business that can grow very rapidly (like ours) requires capital.
    It has been interesting to see how much more relevant these kinds of posts are when you're in the thick of it on a daily basis!
  • We're bootstrapping our business. Your article rings true to us.

    The one thing I would add is that, at least in my observation, a significant percentage (i think the majority) of companies that are funded by VCs today should be bootstraps. You have a paragraph at the end of your article describing how some companies can't take the bootstrap path. You're missing a paragraph describing the startups that shouldn't take the VC path. I believe when a company that can bootstrap, takes VC, it warps their values, and ultimately may lower their chances at success.

    I think we're in a world right now where bootstrapping is the exception, and VC is the norm. I think that should be inverted.
  • Johnny
    Hillel, I'd say that the VC/Boot debate isn't as important as the Entrepreneur/Employee mentality. Israel has done a wonderful job of stimulating their economy by encouraging micro-entrepreneurs to take small risks often.

    I know plenty of entrepreneurs with profitable startups that would kill for VC funding just to make some breathing room. When you have a choice between writing yourself a paycheck or more investment towards building the company it can be a very difficult decision.
  • Agreed. I guess I think the vc/boot paths can each act as a forcing function to get the right entrepreneur employee mentality. Not always, but often.
  • Appreciate the thorough discussion. I'm on the brink of moonlighting and like the tip of inviting people in to help with the direction and growth. Hadn't thought about that.
  • Adam
    Good information. I've been bootstrapping my company http://WebStarts.com for a couple of years now. We're experiencing most of what's addressed in the article.
  • It's important to keep many of the same bootstrapping ideas while operating and growing a business even after funding. To quote Howard Lindzon, "Too small to fail" is one way to look at the problem. Operations that are lean and mean that utilize outsource partners are a good example. Collaborative workforce technologies also reduce the need for a dedicated staff and companies can therefore operate efficiently with independent contractors and consultants. Companies that look at new technologies to support such business models will have success surviving and growing in this turbulent market. We have 2 employees and have been in stealth mode for 3 years producing products that support collaborative workforce efficiency in the online retail space. I plan to continue to run our business as efficiently as possible with or without funding.
  • edhardy622
    British law student sues Abercrombie-Fitch for disability discrimination.
    http://www.abercrombieonsale.co.uk