Lala may lead bid for Facebook music service, but questions loom

Facebook wants to let its users freely listen to and share music — and it’s considering a partnership with music site Lala to help it do so, industry sources tell us. Lala’s model, though, doesn’t exactly fit what Facebook has had in mind. Facebook originally envisioned offering unlimited streaming music to its users, comparable to MySpace Music — and Lala doesn’t provide that. Instead, the service lets you listen to a song for free once, then choose to buy it or otherwise listen to a 30-second clip.

The prominence of Lala at this point in the planning stage — if my sources are accurate — makes me wonder if the whole idea of Facebook “Music” is headed for the dustbin.

This summer, Facebook approached a handful of online music companies with a “Request for Proposal” about how they might integrate streaming music into Facebook. Companies that received RFPs included Last.fm, imeem, Rhapsody, iLike, Project Playlist and Lala. Third parties, led by iLike, had already built relatively comprehensive music applications for Facebook users. Only imeem (and MySpace Music) has a license from record labels to let users do things like create and share free playlists of complete songs. The RFP stated that free streaming music was a “must-have.”

Unless Lala has worked out some as-yet-unannounced way to stream unlimited music, its service doesn’t seem like a great fit with Facebook, especially considering that iLike already lets users create and share music in limited form. Indeed, choosing a specific partner for music conflicts with Facebook’s previously-stated goal of letting developers build their own applications on a level playing field; Facebook’s music service would surely be featured more prominently than other applications within the site interface. (See my recent report on Facebook’s platform for more on that issue.)

So, why the lack of enthusiasm among the other music companies that received the RFP? Sources say Facebook doesn’t have a clear revenue stream planned for the service. These other companies have tens of millions of users. They’ve worked out various methods of coexisting with labels including various licensing agreements. They have other means of making money that they’re busy working on. And they have ownership issues. Rhapsody, for example, is co-owned by Viacom’s MTV, not a close friend of Facebook. Any deal with Facebook increases the risk that the labels will force them — and Facebook — back to the negotiating table to work out a more expensive relationship.

Licensing issues, like lawsuits from record labels, are likely on Facebook executives’ minds these days. Last week, major labels Warner, EMI and Universal Music Group sent out cease-and-desist letters to MySpace and Facebook, telling the companies to remove an application made by Project Playlist. The accusation was that Project Playlist had failed to stop its users from illegally uploading and sharing copyrighted music. Facebook removed Project Playlist earlier this week.

Lala, though, is small. It has launched three times already with various business models — to rave reviews — but it has yet to demonstrate significant traction. So a deal with Facebook holds more upside and less risk for Lala than for larger rivals.

For its part, Facebook responded to my query about this article with the following:

We don’t have more to add than what we’ve said previously. Clearly, the music vertical is an edge case with a lot of complexity around rights and licensing. And music is an area where it would make sense to partner with a company that can bring relevant expetise to deliver an experience to Facebook users that we cannot. We’re not going to confirm discussions with specific companies, but we will continue to explore the various options.

So nothing’s decided. Lala may drop out, a new partner may rise, or Facebook may decide to build a music service on its own — or kill the project entirely.

Next Story: Roundup: NASA awards startups, social network revenues reviewed, and more
Previous Story: Watch this: Our top ten videos of 2008

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Eric Eldon

About the Author, Eric Eldon

Eric currently covers digital media technology and business news, especially what's happening on social networks and their platforms. He also writes and edits stories about venture capital, and lots of other stuff, too. He started at VentureBeat in the spring of 2007, half a year or so after Matt Marshall left his reporting job at the San Jose Mercury News to found the site. Eric previously cofounded a startup called Writewith, that was building editorial software for newspapers and other groups of writers. The startup didn't work out, but he learned a lot.

  • The facebook pundit of record, you are. Like Dean on the Xbox. Assume you saw the Techcrunch rumor on apps taking advantage of project playlist's issues with the labels?
  • another forgotten artist
    If they really want to take on MySpace, they should be focusing on how to own the attention of the musicians (indie and mainstream) by providing the best tools for them to do their business and drive fan relationships.

    Focusing on the fan experience is good (and necessary), but Facebook will only win if its the first place that artists and labels login everyday (currently myspace). They need more than music discovery tools and playlists for fans. Every artist can't be driven to the top by discovery. That would mean increasing the size of the music listening pie. But they can help cultivate the millions of niche followings if they put power into the hands of the artists themselves. Give the artists the tools to carve out their own slice. Then they would be embracing millions of artists to drive people to facebook, instead of hundreds of major label acts. Dare I say this would be a repeat of MySpace's original strategy (that worked quite well)?

    You comments about the tangle of rights holders are spot on. Good luck negotiating with the majors without giving away the company to the labels, or not getting 100% participation. Others have tried.....
  • Technically, Lala has free streaming music — for the first time it's played. They also have unlimited for those that it detects you already own.
  • Dennis R.
    Facebook getting into any application developer's business is BAD. What areas are they going to compete with in the future?
  • Lala only works in the US. The US might have the most users total on Facebook, but last I checked, Canadians are the highest per capita, and international markets must be one major growth areas for Facebook right now.
  • edhardy622
    UGGs became ubiquitous among Southern California surfers and Southern California downhill skiers, and from there, Uggs, which name comes from the Australian
    http://www.uggboots365.co.uk