Meet the new Midas List, same as the old list

Forbes has released the latest edition of its Midas List ranking of the top investors, and it’s full of familiar faces. The top four spots are literally identical to last year’s list, with Google backers John Doerr (of Kleiner Perkins), Michael Moritz (of Sequoia Capital), Ram Shiram (of Sherpalo), and Stanford Prof. David Cheriton holding on to their titles as the titans of venture capital. The lack of movement isn’t too surprising, since VCs didn’t exactly make a lot of money in 2008 — in fact, it was the worst year for venture liquidity since 2003.

Moving down the list a bit, who were the big winners and losers? Sigma Partners‘ Gregory Gretsch got on at number 19, largely by investing in EqualLogic, which was last year’s biggest exit with a $1.4 billion acquisition from Dell. Meanwhile, famed venture capitalist Vinod Khosla of Khosla Ventures, who was down at number 70 last year, has dropped off altogether. Forbes’ calculations are based on investors’ last five years of returns, so expect to see bigger shifts next year, when Google’s IPO falls beyond that horizon. Doerr, for example, had literally no exits in 2008. (He edged past Moritz on last year’s list due to Microsoft’s $800 million acquisition of Tellme.)

Perhaps more interesting than movement up and down the list is the overall doom-and-gloom tone of the articles. The main piece focuses on a shift away from big return, early-stage investing, while Rebecca Buckman has an article provocatively titled “Venture capital’s coming collapse.” But even these pieces reiterate themes we’ve hit on in the past, most notably last November when VentureBeat Editor Matt Marshall declared, “The VC model is broken.” Matt expressed concern about the rush to private equity and predicted that the current downturn could cause a much bigger shakeout in the venture industry than the last one.

Now that you’re thoroughly depressed, here’s the Midas Top 10:

1. John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
2. Michael Moritz, Sequoia Capital
3. Ram Shriram, Sherpalo
4. David Cheriton, Stanford University
5. William Ford, General Atlantic
6. Ronald Conway, angel investor
7. Andreas von Bechtolsheim, Arista Networks
8. Aneel Bhusri, Greylock Partners
9. James Perry, Madison Dearborn Partners
10. Thomas Ng, Granite Global Ventures

And you can see the full list here.

Next Story: Mixm8 developing a virtual world for music lovers
Previous Story: THQ lays off 100, focuses wireless games on smart phones only

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • Get a Clue
    Geez.....a business model that is being flushed down the drain and they still pat themselves on the back with this idiotic ranking.
  • First of all, VentureBeat didn't come up with the whole "VC is broken" idea. If anyone gets that credit, it's Adeo and he got it from Sequoia's RIP presentation, so stop trying to claim VentureBeat does anything but reprint TechCrunch posts and focuses too much on iPhone apps no one cares about! Other than that, good job at saying what others have been talking/writing about for more than six months now.
  • The Sequoia RIP presentation (which I published first) was less than six months old. That's just one reason why your comment is clueless.
  • I'm not saying TheFunded was the first to break it ... I don't care about the RIP presentation, just like no one else in the industry does. I'm just saying the whole "VC is broken" story isn't some VentureBeat exclusive.
  • That is certainly true.
  • If you'll read the paragraph again, you'll notice that I wasn't claiming any exclusivity to the idea (which would make about as much sense as claiming exclusivity on the idea that the economy is doing badly right now), simply pointing out that these are issues we've talked about again and again, and linking to a relevant article.