VideoEgg ad network performing well

Online display advertising is getting hit by shrinking ad budgets and ever-increasing inventory — and VideoEgg thinks it has come up with a set of solutions. The company offers an ad network for “rich media” — videos, games, polls and other interactive features — designed to grab the attention of web users better than traditional display “banner” ads.

Today, it’s announcing some promising numbers from last year: 171 percent revenue growth in North America, and expansion to more than 100 million unique visitors in December from 85 million the previous month. This is against the trend. Overall display advertising dropped seven percent during the fourth quarter of last year. To date, VideoEgg has delivered more than 1,200 campaigns to more than 300 advertisers, including McDonalds, Nike, Kraft, HP and many others.

But how much revenue, you ask? The San Francisco company isn’t disclosing that — most startups don’t — but its growth suggests it has a solid position within a turbulent industry. Brand advertisers want as many people as possible to pay attention to what they have to offer — a new kind of deodorant, a new kind of razor, or other products that most people consume. But now they’re cutting banner advertising because it hasn’t been yielding results. This is making life tough for the publishers who rely on this money to survive. Indeed, 27 large web publishers announced today that they are introducing new formats to force readers to see ads, including formats that feature a prominent window with interactive features on a page, and ads that scroll down with you as you read an article. At the same time, these publishers are reducing the overall number of ads on the site to keep readers focused on the ads they do run. The idea is that publishers will be able to prove to advertisers that users actually pay attention to these ads (rather than clicking away in annoyance). Even Google is trying out new forms of interactivity for some of its ads.

Perhaps presciently, VideoEgg itself recommended similar forms of advertising just the other week, in a blog post and presentation by chief marketing officer Troy Young (see also the two excerpted slides above). Here’s more from the post:

While we can get deeply apocalyptic about the future of advertising, at the end of the day we will continue to have thousands of marketers vying for limited mental shelf space. They will continue to buy rights to the mental spectrum. Hard bits matter less, soft matter more. We need to tell stories more than ever.

Young sketches out a number of improvements he thinks publishers and advertisers need to collectively push for in order to make display advertising work, including ads that interrupt the user experience (pre-rolls before videos, full page ads), bigger and more colorful ads, and a form of “media currency.” By currency, Young is referring to the cost-per-engagement method of charging when a user somehow interacts with an ad by watching a video, taking a poll, or whatnot. Traditional banner ads use the CPM (cost-per-mille, or cost per thousand user impressions) rate, which is problematic when thousands of readers are looking at a page but ignoring the banners.

While CPM rates can average in pennies, CPE rates average in dollars. In the two screenshots here of a VideoEgg ad for the movie Watchmen, taken from the VideoEgg site, you first see a side panel with an ad, then you hover over it to expand the ad to a screen-sized video about the movie.

The problem, though, is that most advertisers and the agencies they employ aren’t organized to create and distribute these ads. VideoEgg is trying to help solve that problem by having an in-house creative staff to help advertisers customize existing campaigns to fit VideoEgg ad formats.

The challenge, though, is in creating ads that force users to pay more attention without driving them away. VideoEgg describes this as “a game of chicken” for web publishers — a game in which it hopes it can come first (sorry, couldn’t resist the pun). To that end, the company is also announcing an expansion of its salesforce today. It’s opening up a new office in Atlanta and hiring more sales staffers for its six existing offices around North America.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Photo of Eric Eldon

About the Author, Eric Eldon

Eric currently covers digital media technology and business news, especially what's happening on social networks and their platforms. He also writes and edits stories about venture capital, and lots of other stuff, too. He started at VentureBeat in the spring of 2007, half a year or so after Matt Marshall left his reporting job at the San Jose Mercury News to found the site. Eric previously cofounded a startup called Writewith, that was building editorial software for newspapers and other groups of writers. The startup didn't work out, but he learned a lot.

  • Thanks for weighing in Jonas. We think performance is critical for all involved: advertisers, publishers, and users. Has to work for everyone. Turns out not all ad placements or impressions are equal. All too often brands aren’t getting the attention they think they are paying for. Tons of issues: out of frame placement, clutter on the page, time the user on the page, multi-tabbed browsing, ad blindness, etc. Advertisers are taking a lot of risk. That’s why we switched to CPE (Cost per Engagement), and it's far more accountable for the advertiser.

    Our approach is working for many publishers. High engagement generally means a great ad placement with high branding value, high awareness and interest from users. Of course, because it’s a brand performance model we see a huge range in performance, and as a result eCPM, across our publishers. There are publishers earning $0.30 - 0.50, but we have plenty of publishers doing very well, with the high end of our range north of $8.00 eCPMs.

    It’s working for users too. They’re in control and opting into ads at very healthy rates, spending meaningful time in the experience (often more than 20 seconds on average).

    Moves like the OPAs today are an indictment of the effectiveness of traditional display banners. We think there are better ways to create value for everyone involved and we’ve been delighted by the response from our partners, advertisers and publisher alike.

    Matt Sanchez
    CEO, VideoEgg
  • thanks for keeping us posted

    kelly
  • Problem is they pay on performance so pubs don't earn very high eCPMs for what is essentially a brand ad. So of course their revenue is growing 1) it is a start up, so the % is moot 2) advertisers on pay for engagement with the unit, so their is no waste for them. Basically they are getting branding on the cheap. I like the ad unit a lot, just not their pricing model from a publisher view. VideoEgg, prove me wrong.
blog comments powered by Disqus