Bit.ly nabs cash, gives TinyURL a run for its money

At first glance, Bit.ly looks like every other URL shortening service — turning lengthy web addresses into something compact and easily-tweeted like http://bit.ly/11BCd2 — indistinguishable from the Short.tos and Doiops of the world. Of course, TinyURL, the first of its kind, remains the heavyweight, seemingly immune from its drop-in-the-bucket challengers. But with $2 million from several renowned investors, Bit.ly is now in a position to become a force on its own.

This first round of financing came from big names like open-source evangelist and MySQL investor Tim O’Reilly, SoftTech VC head Jeff Clavier and Google and PayPal angel Ron Conway — providing Bit.ly with instant legitimacy and suggesting it has more in store than simple URL shortening. In addition to the money, Bit.ly will gain the business of these investors’ portfolio companies, giving it a nice boost, according to ReadWriteWeb.

This is especially valuable considering the unique direction Bit.ly plans to take. The company has been collecting data on all of the URLs that pass through its service for a while now. It records click-throughs for all of these sites (20 million in just the last week), and provides those numbers to third-party developers. With a potentially massive database, the data Bit.ly processes could prove invaluable to all kinds of enterprises and investors. It already lists its system’s most popular sites on its Twitter account @bitlynow. Eventually, it could tell even casual users what the hottest sites on the web are.

Bit.ly is also able to highlight keywords in the websites it handles, making them searchable by specific terms. For example, if you were interested in seeing the most popular sites discussing anything from TV show Lost to the economy, in real time, you could conduct just one search, and the results would be continuously updated based on the URLs actively being shortened at the time.

As ReadWriteWeb points out, there have been some concerns about the accuracy of the click-through figures Bit.ly turns out, but the stats are already 10 percent within those reported by Google Analytics and are reported much faster. On top of that, this feature is expected to improve as product development continues and more URLs are added to the company’s swelling database (the total is growing by 10 percent each week).

No other URL shortening service (and there are lots that are desperate to differentiate themselves) has delved into semantic and traffic data to nearly the same degree. And with its new cash in hand, Bit.ly is poised to see its business explode even more. The funding may not be enough to overtake leading TinyURL, but that might not be the measure of success the company is looking for.

Lotus investor Mitch Kapor, the Accelerator Group and Howard Lindzon’s Social Leverage fund also contributed to the round.

Next Story: Could this be Apple’s netbook? Probably not, but let’s hope.
Previous Story: Livescribe raises $7.5M more for Pulse smartpen

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Photo of Camille Ricketts

About the Author, Camille Ricketts

Camille is the lead writer for GreenBeat. She came to VentureBeat from Google where she worked on its traditional platforms team, particularly in TV. Before that, she was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in New York and London. Follow her on Twitter at @camillericketts, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

With GreenBeat 2009, VentureBeat's all-star conference on all things Smart Grid, coming up in November, Camille will be expanding coverage of this exciting space. Stay up to date by following @greenbeat2009 on Twitter or by becoming a fan of the event on Facebook here.

  • I don't get it... how do you monetize this kind of service? Try the best home page
  • AJ
    How do you monetize your homepage site?
  • Let's hope they have an archive.org export or database escrow in their funding plans.

    Here's what I mean:

    I've been using LiveJournal for a long time [1].

    One of the things I loved about LiveJournal was how easily I could post links to my favorite cNet articles from news.com. It was awesome. I could post a link, a comment on it, and it was fun to share with folks/ Of course, this was before this whole share-centric web evolved before our eyes in the past few years.

    One of the areas I've been interested in lately in the wake of our here today and gone tomorrow approach to the web has been link rot [2]. After reviewing some of my entries from years gone by on LiveJournal, my comments and links to news.com just don't make any sense now.

    Why? Well, the URL's I posted don't go anywhere useful, there is no context relevant SEO word loading... etc.. etc... it's just a 404 Not Found redirecting to a page with no help or relevant hint as to what I was referring to or talking about. I also learned that "Hah, this is cool!" does not make for very good metadata. Lesson learned.

    So, I have to wonder how long bit.ly/something will really be available for the long haul... whatever that long haul might be. If a tinyurl.com or the many clones die... what happens to their hash database tables that present the magic 301 redirect to where you would be going? What about that? Does it matter?

    To that end...

    http://tinyurl.com/thiswascool10yearsago
    and
    http://bit.ly/thiswascool10yearsago


    [1] ~10 years *yikes*
    [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_rot