Disney CEO: Pulling online video is anti-tech, anti-consumer

April 3, 2009 | Terrence Russell | Comments | |

Let’s be honest — Disney took its sweet time in partnering with Hulu and YouTube. But, chief executive Robert Iger says upping Disney’s online video reach was always part of the plan. During Iger’s keynote at the Cable Show conference in D.C., the Disney executive argued that the industry’s survival hinges on embracing online video rather than yanking content.

To note, Disney already has a relatively solid track record in the online space. Disney-owned ABC eventually became the first network to stream full-length ad-supported episodes online, and Disney also broke ground by being the first programmer to pen distribution deals with iTunes. During his keynote, Iger advanced this stance by arguing that broadcasters and cable providers should leverage openly available online outlets, rather than forcing viewers into “anti-consumer” and “anti-technology” multi-channel subscription services.

Of course, Iger’s anti-consumer/tech sentiments are correct. The growing popularity and content deals surrounding free video sites like YouTube and Hulu are indicative of consumer desire. As online video outlets sprout up, viewers will have the means to discover new content in a wealth of ways. Iger argues that the best way for Disney to take advantage is by having its online video serve two purposes: to extend its core brand, and to expand its primarily TV-based viewing audience. Naturally, the practice of yanking freely available online content in favor of a proprietary solution runs counter to those goals.

But, that doesn’t mean the freshly inked deals with Hulu and YouTube will grant unfettered access to Disney’s catalog. What Iger is promoting is the use of Hulu and YouTube to whet viewers’ appetites — not to satiate them. For online video fans, this still means a rotating patchwork of shows and limited episode availability on a given site.

Though this might be disappointing for those wanting to watch every single “Lost” episode for free, it’s still a smart move for Disney. Hulu and YouTube have excelled because they’ve made the commitment to build online video destinations. By offering a wealth of content from a number of providers, they’ve created environments where users can watch shows from multiple providers in a convenient location. Rather than trying to build a proprietary (and likely subscription-based) alternative, Disney is probably better off enriching those sites with compelling selections from its catalog.

….at least for now.

Photo courtesy of Walt Disney Co.

Next Story: Roundup: Twitter rumor frenzy, AT&T prepping for a new iPhone, Yahoo Music opening up and more
Previous Story: Rumor: Zynga making more than $50 million on virtual goods

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , ,

Photo of Terrence Russell

About the Author, Terrence Russell

Terrence writes about online video and digital media licensing for Venture Beat. When he isn't binging on the newest television series to hit the web, Terrence contributes to WIRED Magazine and Wired.com.

  • Let us not forget the “anti-consumer” and “anti-technology” trend of bandwidth caps implemented by Cable providers that want to push their lucrative multi-channel subscription services. In their eyes that's much better than being a "dumb pipe" for IP video.

    Not that Disney would campaign against monthly transfer caps, being in bed with Time Warner and owning many of the channels that get bundled with cable, whether people want them or not...

    Time for the FCC to start actually acting in the interest of the Public - force de-bundling and tell Time Warner (and others) where they can stick their transfer caps.
  • "the Disney executive argued that the industry’s survival hinges on embracing online video rather than yanking content"

    I agree. Folks are now watching Internet content on their TVs. Join in or lose out.

    PCTVCables.com