The new City on a Hill is solar-powered

Utopian experiments have finally gone high-tech. Today, Florida real estate developer and former NFL linebacker Syd Kitson announced his intention to build the U.S.’s first city powered entirely by solar energy. Dubbed “Babcock Ranch,” the 17,000-acre community — 20 miles from Fort Myers on the Gulf Coast — will include residential, commercial and industrial zones and draw all of its electricity from a 75-megawatt solar array operated by Florida Power & Light (twice the size of the current largest photovoltaic plant in the world) [Update: This is incorrect. The largest solar plant in the world is in Olmedilla, Spain at 60 megawatts].

With 6 million square feet of inhabitable space — including 19,500 homes — Kitson estimates he needs to attract at least 45,000 residents to his $2 billion ranch. To do so, he plans to advertise 20,000 available, permanent jobs (a rarity in this economy), good schools, acres of wilderness preserves and open space, and the opportunity to reduce your carbon footprint to nil. As far as what kind of jobs the city might offer, Kitson says he’s encouraging companies that make solar installation equipment, lithium-ion batteries and other cleantech gadgetry to relocate to the city — transforming it into a hub for research and development as well as testing.

After laying the foundation for the ranch next year (construction is slated to start at the end of 2009), Kitson says he plans to integrate other renewable energy sources into the city, turning it into a sort of “laboratory” for the new energy economy, according to the New York Times. Already, the city is designed to run on an integrated smart grid that will let residents and businesses track exactly how much energy they’re using in real time. Kitson says he hopes to fund much of Babcock’s development with capital from outside sources. Morgan Stanley ponied up half the funds Kitson used to buy the ranch in the first place, but no other firms have been publicly tapped.

So far, plans for construction are getting the thumbs up from green technology and environmental groups around the state. It helps that Kitson bought the land from a family that had used it for damaging lumber and ranching operations. So many are happy to see it restored with what seem to be pretty pure intentions in lieu of being sold off in pieces. It hasn’t been all sunny skies for Babcock, however. Kitson’s company, Kitson & Partners, has been shaken pretty badly by the financial and housing crises, forced to lay off employees and watch its debt rating plunge. These conditions may result in construction delays but aren’t expected to halt the project altogether.

Speaking of the timeline, after breaking ground this year, Kitson says the downtown area should be standing by the middle of 2010, with residential and commercial buildout scheduled for the following fall and winter. This is good news for Florida Power & Light, which will not only get the distinction of holding the record for largest solar facility in the world, but will also more easily hit the renewable energy targets outlined by governor Charlie Crist. Legislation that will likely pass this year would make it mandatory for all electric companies to generate at least 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by the year 2020.

It seems noble for FPL to position itself on the right side of these well-intended laws, but smaller solar companies and trade groups have expressed concern that the Babcock Ranch project will only establish the company’s dominance in the renewable space, squeezing out independent players that would provide more jobs and cost-effective energy. Right now, FPL is executing on plans to build two plants in DeSoto and Martin Counties, capable of producing 110 megawatts combined. They will be the first two utility-scale solar facilities in the state, giving FPL a distinct upper hand. Regardless, Kitson seems undeterred, marching ahead with plans to start construction on the $300 million plant before the year is out.

Next Story: Yelp lets businesses set the record straight with owner comments
Previous Story: Mitsubishi jumps into U.S. electric car race with i MiEV . . . in Oregon?

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Camille Ricketts

About the Author, Camille Ricketts

Camille is the lead writer for GreenBeat. She came to VentureBeat from Google where she worked on its traditional platforms team, particularly in TV. Before that, she was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in New York and London. Follow her on Twitter at @camillericketts, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

With GreenBeat 2009, VentureBeat's all-star conference on all things Smart Grid, coming up in November, Camille will be expanding coverage of this exciting space. Stay up to date by following @greenbeat2009 on Twitter or by becoming a fan of the event on Facebook here.

  • Facebook User
    This looks like it'll be an exciting project and green too! Notice how many jobs were discussed! YAY!
  • Peter Antypas
    We absolutely need an innovation hub like this. In the mean time, the freaking Emirates is beating us to it with Masdar while we fight over saving this dinosaur called the F22 Raptor ...
  • Vaughn
    I love how the developers/fund managers/scoundrels are using solar and other green initiatives to get investors to fund the construction of more homes (and local council members to approve this project) in Florida when there is a foreclosure every 20 seconds in the state. Plus there are tens of thousands of vacant speculation homes that developers/builders have in their inventories that they can’t sell. Florida and the entire county does not need more inventory of homes. The United States housing bubble has created a depression throughout the world; foreign countries were the primary funding source for the great expansion from 2002 through 2008. If the developers/fund managers/scoundrels want to reduce the carbon foot print, they should buy 17,500 bank owned homes in Florida out of foreclosure, gut them, apply all the great green ideas and resell them. This would be cheaper, would allow the ranch to say a ranch and temporarily take 17,500 off the market. I would be willing to bet (if I could short the energy company’s solar project proposed for this ranch) that in 3 years this is a total flop. Why isn’t anyone else questioning this ridiculous project?
  • Peter Antypas
    I can answer your question very easily: "Master planned communities" that contain these homes you're referring to, have NEVER been designed with energy efficiency and carbon footprint in mind. Gutting and re-fitting the homes isn't going to solve the problem. We need to completely rethink and re-invent urban planning in this country and for that we have to start with a clean slate. We need communities that minimize the need for driving. We need to abolish the idea of the commute. We need to do away with stupid zoning laws and covenants designed for an era of oil glut.

    Who knows if this project will succeed, of course, but at least I support the initiative.
  • Vaughn
    If we can get the masses to buy into this type of project maybe the government should offer a tax rebate for those who abandon their current homes using electricity from coal and nuclear plants and purchase in carbon neutral communities energized by the sun, wind and earth. I say that in jest because until supply and demand of housing in south Florida gets back on track it will be extremely hard for developers of new and “green” homes to complete with bank owned and homes developers own that they must sell below replacement value. Ideas are great, but this one is impractical.
    In my opinion, being a solar panel and solar hot water heater owner, the means to the end of the energy crisis is solar and other energy producing products on the manufactured good for which the energy is used. Creating these farms full of wind turbines and solar is great but we should be individually responsible for our own power requirements. Study’s done on a proposed wind farm off the coast of Delaware (where I live) show that 50-65% of the power generated from the turbines is lost in transmission. That’s a lot when you consider the cost of each kW produced.
  • Please check your facts about the world's largest utility scale Photovoltaic plants at PV Resources (http://www.pvresources.com/en/top50pv.php).

    Right now it is 60 MW in Olmedilla (Castila La Mancha), Spain, commissioned September 2008. So yes, this will be larger but not two (2) times.
  • You're right, the Olmedilla plant is bigger -- the sources I used yesterday cited Waldpolenz Solar Park in Germany as the largest in the world. Thanks for catching this.