Study: Windows 7 could follow Vista to an early grave

Redmond’s latest and greatest — the Microsoft Windows 7 operating system — runs the risk of following a similar path its last version, Vista, according to a study being released this week by Dimensional Research. InformationWeek, which got an early look at the study and was first to report on it today, relayed some key results: 83 percent of corporate IT departments plan to hold off on upgrading to Windows 7 for at least 12 months.

If we’re to believe the survey, 42 percent of IT departments will wait 12 to 24 months, another 24 percent will wait 24 to 36 months, and 17 percent will wait more than 36 months. The study also found that 50 percent of those surveyed are considering or have considered a move to a non-Windows OS. I queried Dimensional on this number since it was so high, and they forwarded me this from their study:

This same question was asked in similar surveys conducted in 2007 and 2008. In 2007, 44 percent of participants said that they had considered this alternative, and in 2008 42 percent of participants said they had. In this 2009 survey, the number jumped to 50 percent.

Of that 50 percent who consider a switch, says Dimensional, 14 percent actually follow through. “There is a distinct upward trend in this number over the past two years (9% to 11% to 14%),” Dimensional’s Senior Research Analyst Diane Hagglund told me.

Vista only runs on about one out of every 10 business PCs, according to Forrester. This pales in comparison to Windows XP, which runs on about 7 out of every 10 PCs. Equate it to a disfunctional marriage: you really should be divorced, yet you can’t imagine life without one another.

Add to this developers’ blase attitude towards Vista. Last year, only eight percent were writing applications for Vista, an Evans Data study indicated. That figure was only expected to rise to 24 percent this year, according to the firm’s projections. The Vista hate seems to be universal.

If we are to put stock in Dimensional’s findings, and Microsoft really does run the risk of repeating history with Windows 7, what can it do to prevent that? For one thing, time may be on Microsoft’s side. Free support for XP runs out Tuesday. While paid extended support expires in 2014, it’s likely that, rather than spending extra money for support of an aging product, companies will opt to upgrade. With the economy the way it is, cutting costs is always a good thing.

Another thing Microsoft could do is urge developers to actually develop applications for Windows 7. It’s a valid point of argument that Vista failed in part because there were no applications really were made for the operating system, as MG Siegler pointed out last year. Enterprise — and heck, consumers too — need a reason to upgrade. The best place to start would be software.

Next Story: Ravenflow lands $6M for app development intelligence
Previous Story: BookTour gets $350K for author event directory

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

  • There's a lot to be said for the numbers in the Dimensional/KACE study. For one, the numbers can be interpreted in an entirely different way: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10217917-75.h...

    But such is the case with any body of day. Statistics is the art of using numbers to say what you want.
  • I hate typos. By day, I of course meant "data."

    Cheers!
  • I'm not sure this is any "worse" than past migrations from one OS to another. Corporate IT departments have always been slow to adopt new migrations and many as a policy skip versions altogether. It would be more interesting to look at actual adoption curves back to Windows 3.0
  • Great point. I've pinged Dimensional on both points, folks. I am thinking Larry may have slightly misinterpreted that 14 percent number as being of the whole survey rather than 14% of that 50% that have considered... but I want to double check with the source for clarification.
  • Joe Toe
    ask stupid questions, get stupid answers. How did Dimension position the value of Win7 vs WinXP... was it just another OS without any reason to upgrade? Or did they get into the advantages of x64 Win7?
  • Yes god forbid Microsoft do something for the developers: Make Visual Studio free for personal use you friggin' idiots.
  • Peter Antypas
    Actually I don't even understand why Microsoft still regards development tools as "product".
  • Bojan
    Express version *IS* free, and is feature-full
  • bloop
    Keep in mind that the Win7 design is very close to that of Vista, so applications will not need to be rebuilt for it...
  • foo
    Windows 7 will be so awesome! With it, you'll be able to do word processing, spreadsheets, play games, even browse the internet! It comes with a nifty calculator too. I'll buy Windows 7 no matter what it costs!

    Not.
  • Jeremy
    Why does the conventional user even need an OS? The birth of the browser (which can easily be hard coded onto a chip) spelled the doom of the the OS. Maturation of the cloud is simply the nail in the coffin.
  • You guys really need to re-read the reports. As Ed Bott points out here http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=826, the reality of the data reported is that:

    more than 80% of IT pros plan to move to Windows 7 within 36 months of the survey date (which was in turn about six months earlier than the expected release date of Windows 7 in September of this year). That would be, by historical standards, phenomenal. Breathtaking, in fact.

    Pacific Crest Securities' survey tends to corroborate these numbers:
    * 50% plan to upgrade to Windows 7 as soon as it is available
    * 46% expect to start the upgrade before the end of 2009, within months of Windows 7’s release
    * 55% of respondents expect to do system-wide upgrades, rather than upgrading as new PCs are purchased.

    I think you need to revisit your analysis.
  • If Micorsoft bothered writing new OSes that were as fast as the ones they were replacing, people might migrate to them. But to pay for an OS that is provably slower than XP SP3 is never going to be popular among the paying public. They'll stick to their guns. I only moved to XP once it was proven to run faster on the same hardware than Win 98 SE !!!
  • Kyle Franz
    Win7 _is_ faster than XP.
  • I'm sorry, *only 24%*? That's one-quarter of business, a number any competitor could only dream of owning.
  • Ken Knopfli
    Why would any developer specifically develop FOR Vista, or develop FOR Win7?

    Surely most will want to address as many installed OSs out there? If I were to write a program from scratch now, I'd target XP, Vista, Win7 and, if at all possible, Win95/98/ME too, unless there is some special reason not to.
  • Ken Knopfli
    Why would any developer SPECIFICALLY develop only for Vista or Win7, unless there is some must-have OS-specific feature required?

    If I were to write a program from scratch now, I'd assume my executable runs on XP, Vista and Win7. Why shouldn't it? And if it also runs on Win95/98/ME, all the better.
  • Good work !
  • honn robinson
    hi im a geeksquad agent iand im sure that the percentage of business useing windows 7 will sore to a wopping 80 percent due to the fact that this os is so much more user friendly and this is what the people have be waiting for you have faster web browsing and more softwear compatability and the systems windows updates process i less painful to the os
    i will say microsoft has done a mavalous job on this one so if you want a great os like xp was you got it with windows 7 hay windows xp eat your heart out .
  • I've read on many blogs that the install process of win 7 would have been faster, but I didn't really noticed any improvement on it; especially if compared to vista. It takes 35minutes on fast machines and 1hour in slow ones.