iPhone users eating up AT&T’s network

No data limit!iPhone users consume two to four times as much network data volume as other smartphone users, according to traffic measurement company Comscore.

That’s increasingly a problem for AT&T, which serves all those iPhone users in the US and must pay for the bandwidth to handle it all. AT&T starts at a loss by subsidizing customers’ iPhones. Then, it charges them only $30 per month for unlimited data download & upload — or the same it charges users of other smartphone, even though those users are cheaper to serve.

iPhone users now make up for 7.5% of AT&T’s subscribers. Their data-hungry lifestyles have strained AT&T’s infrastructure so much that “AT&T will need to add cell towers and spend more on the back-haul lines that connect the towers to the rest of the network,” the WSJ reports, after citing stats from Alcatel-Lucent, a network equipment maker showing how bandwidth-hogging Web browsing is. Web browsing consumers 32% of data-related airtime but 69% of bandwidth, while email used 30% of data airtime but only 4% of bandwidth, the study found.

It’s easy to pontificate — as the Journal’s analyst sources do — that AT&T should do away with unlimited data plans, or raise the price on iPhone users. But the company’s discount pricing on the expensive iPhone and its accompanying high-bandwidth lifetyle aren’t an accident. With more touchscreen iPhone competitors like the Palm Pre coming to market, and AT&T’s exclusive status as iPhone carrier set to expire next year, the company is clearly willing to pour money into locking down as many iPhone customers as it can.

(Photo credit: Anirudh Koul)

[Are you an entrepreneur or executive active in mobile? Come network with industry players at MobileBeat, our mobile conference for industry leaders. Sign up by May 23, and save $145.]

Next Story: Fisker taps EnrDel for electric car batteries
Previous Story: SocialMedia turns Twitter, Facebook info into web-wide social ads

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' technology section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • HereAndNow
    This is why WiFi is such an important "companion" for 3G. The more people use WiFi, the less strain there is on the more expensive 3G bandwidth. Perhaps AT&T should consider building out and promoting their WiFi network more.
  • AT&T has started but it is limited to Qwest customers that already have land lines with ADSL

    http://press.qwestapps.com/index.cfm?fa=press.v...

    However, this isn't really as AT&T powered as much as it is one of the patchwork acquisitions performed by AT&T

    http://gigaom.com/2008/11/06/att-buys-wayport-t...

    Basically, AT&T is doing everything possible to avoid investment in their network

    "Here’s what AT&T quietly released a few days ago as some kind of “oh, it’s not a backhaul issue” blurb… and yet, for all the talk — it’s still masking the actual issue: Lack of capacity planning.

    http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/10/att-t...

    AT&T has to improve their backhaul. I haven’t seen that hit the press anywhere yet.

    Contrast this with Verizon who has offered to sell access (this heads off any government intervention… i.e. these guys aren’t dumb) to their wireless (fiber) backhaul network.

    http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/verizon-rents-out-...

    So, in summary: backhaul is something a lot of folks don’t know about but goes to explain a great deal of the frustration people have with the mobile Internet as we know it today (you know, as regularly paying monthly consumers)."

    source: http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/05/11/center-f...