Chances improving for Climate Bill in the Senate?

Democratic nerves are running high that the Senate will kill the so-called “Climate Bill” that just made it out of committee in the House. But a 9-13 vote yesterday in its Energy and Natural Resources Committee prevented the removal of renewable energy mandates from a broader energy bill — suggesting that the Senate might be more amenable to the controversial American Clean Energy and Security Act than previously thought.

Even more encouraging to the climate bill’s supporters in the House, two staunch republicans joined Democrats in opposing the amendment: Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Sam Brownback (R-Kan.). The energy package in the Senate (still open for amendments) would require 15 percent of U.S. retail electricity to come from renewable sources by 2021, whereas the House’s climate bill calls for 20 percent by 2020.

Still, the vote might not be indicative of the climate bill’s fate in the Senate. The energy package focuses on renewables, not emissions — which has been the flashpoint for opposition in the House. Republicans and Democrats agree that the climate bill’s recommended cap-and-trade emissions system remains imperfect, would be difficult to implement and would have a radical impact on the already ailing economy. Undoubtedly, the bill’s supporters and lobbyists still have a tough road to hoe.

Both bills would chip away at president Barack Obama’s overall plan to have a quarter of American electricity be generated by renewable sources by 2025. But some have suggested he’d be willing to stick both pieces of legislation in a drawer until 2010 so that he can go to bat for health care reform instead. With industry strongly opposing the climate bills’ ramifications for the economy and national employment and officials on both sides of the aisle admitting their unwieldy faults, Obama may choose to conserve his political capital. Health care is the top priority for most of Americans, after all.

Both pieces of legislation follow in the footsteps of mandates approved or pending in 29 states and Washington, D.C. Predictably, California leads the pack, aiming to have 33 percent of electricity derived from renewables by 2020.

Next Story: Twitter Astronaut turns out to be tweeting via email
Previous Story: White House looking for more open government ideas

Bookmark and Share
Photo of Camille Ricketts

About the Author, Camille Ricketts

Camille is the lead writer for GreenBeat. She came to VentureBeat from Google where she worked on its traditional platforms team, particularly in TV. Before that, she was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in New York and London. Follow her on Twitter at @camillericketts, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

With GreenBeat 2009, VentureBeat's all-star conference on all things Smart Grid, coming up in November, Camille will be expanding coverage of this exciting space. Stay up to date by following @greenbeat2009 on Twitter or by becoming a fan of the event on Facebook here.

  • HSR0601
    I think energy liberty might fill the contents of health care for all as the energy issue lies at the heart of all problems.
  • This is not, let me repeat an energy bill, it is a control, more control bill on the lifes of John Doe,citizen. What to eat, what kind of car to drive, how warm to keep our house, how cool to keep your house, tax on cokes, tax on salt, next a tax on breathing to cut down on CO2 emissions. This is Big Brother at its worst and not the American way. Its run-a-way stupidity.
  • modelerr
    Alleged man-made global warming via CO2 emmissions, from which all proposed Cap & Trade
    and related legislation is spawned is a colossal and highly expensive fraud being hoisted on all of us. This dog don't hunt, as over 31, 000 US scientist signatories of the Global Warming Petition Project attest. (Google it.) The mainstream media and Al Gore would have us believe "...there is complete consensus....no room for debate ....on this closed issue." If this massive deception weren't so frightening, it would be laughable. Given the projected costs to fix this non-existent problem, no one is laughing.